[antispam-f] Re: Results using lists improving
- From: Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:19:37 GMT
In a recent message Harriet Bazley
<lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2006 as I do recall,
> Frank de Bruijn wrote:
>
>> In article <ab367f934e.Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Most of my lists are now working consistently. I think the
>> > breakthrough was to change all the list entries to lower case. Is
>> > there something in the syntax that demands this?
>>
>> It's implicit for all of AntiSpam's functions (except RegEx). After all,
>> the contents of the header fields are offered for comparison in lower
>> case. The lists are no different from the ordinary rules here.
>>
> They are different; ordinary rules can be specified in any case
> (although they are converted to lowercase by AntiSpam before the
> comparison actually takes place). In fact, a lot of mine are mixed
> case - and presumably a lot of his were too - since those are the
> strings you actually copy from the headers.
>
Hey! That was going to be my response ;-) You do stay up late :-)
I don't think a change in code is necessary, a change in TFM would
suffice. BTW, I find the help file is one of the best that is out
there.
--
Dave
Keep GMT all year
Other related posts:
