In article <4eaa2981eafreelists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin <freelists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In article <b317e0a94e.ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > Richard Porter <ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] > > One thing AntiSpam doesn't let you do (feature request!) is mark a > > message as spam and accept it so that MPro can filter it into the > > Spam folder. Using divert and accept requires manual intervention. > Perhaps this could be done with a rules action of 'accept?' which was > treated like accept, but the X-AntiSpam-Header-Action header set to > 'Accept?' so it could be filtered on in MPro or Pluto? > Or I suppose a more flexible rule action of 'accept(xx)' which set > the header to 'Accept(xx)' where xx was any value. The current alpha's of 1.60 already have an expanded action header feature, so adding this would certainly be an option. What exactly would you want the xx value to represent? Regards, Frank