In message <b98e500152.ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Richard Porter <ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 12 Aug 2011 Martin Angove wrote: > >> Logs don't tell me anything worth knowing, even after ticking all the >> boxes (this was a disappointment as the previous version kept quite >> decent logs - perhaps I've just not set it up right?): > >Go to Choices... > Mailbox > Logging and set level to 'both'. You >probably don't need the debug log, though it might be worth trying. > Ok, here's the log from the message I sent a few minutes ago. AntiSpam started automatically and here's what it did: Commencing at Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:12:32 < +OK Dovecot ready. > CAPA < +OK < CAPA < TOP < UIDL < RESP-CODES < PIPELINING < STLS < USER < SASL PLAIN < . > USER ... < +OK > PASS ... < +OK Logged in. > STAT < +OK 1 6421 > UIDL < +OK < 1 1252530719.6348 < . > LIST 1 < +OK 1 6421 > TOP 1 0 < +OK < Return-Path: <antispam-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> < Received: from buttercup.genesysnet.co.uk (buttercup.genesysnet.co.uk [86.54.100.252]) < by orac.genesysnet.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7CK8Oxb022299 < for <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:08:24 +0100 < Received: from turing.freelists.org (freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180]) < by buttercup.genesysnet.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7CK8iQ4014959 < for <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:08:47 +0100 [lots of headers, snipped] < Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:07:35 +0100 < From: Martin Angove <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> < To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx < Subject: [antispam-f] Re: Only downloads the first time? < Message-ID: <e68cc20152.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> < References: <e9db490152.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <98fb4c0152.ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf9a4e0152.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> < <b98e500152.ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> < In-Reply-To: <b98e500152.ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [snip a few more headers] < X-Spam-Status: No < < . Message 1 accepted by default From: Martin Angove <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [antispam-f] Re: Only downloads the first time? Message-ID: <e68cc20152.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > QUIT < +OK Logging out. Messages accepted on rules: 0 Messages accepted by default: 1 Headers downloaded on rules: 0 Messages deleted: 0 Messages deferred: 0 Messages diverted: 0 Terminating at Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:12:33 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Now, to be complete about this I did have over the last year three messages "stick" on the mail server in a similar manner. The difference now is that those messages were perpetually stuck whereas this time messages are only stuck on re-runs, and of course previously other messages downloaded fine. It's probably not relevant though as - as I mentioned before - I was running a much older version of SpamStamp previously. Also I think there was a problem with the way those messages were formed as they were all from the same person, and after a tweak at their end subsequent messages arrived. Hwyl! M. -- Martin Angove