Richard Porter wrote: > On 19 Mar 2007 Frank de Bruijn wrote: > >>No, just the first six or so from that batch. But they must be in the >>original format, with all the headers intact. > > > Here's the first few. Not sure if they're in the same order as > downloaded. > Sorry that was meant to go to Frank's address (very similar). I was rushing to send it before the PSU tripped. Anyway it looks like a divide by zero error on a dodgy message. I'll try to identify that message if the RPC will run for long enough.