[antispam-f] Re: Logging deferred messages
- From: Richard Porter <ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 12:09:44 GMT
On 29 Nov 2007 Tricia Garner wrote:
> On 29 Nov, in article <4f4974f19bantispam@xxxxxxxxx>,
> Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [Snip]
>>>> What would you need that's currently not shown in the Marking window?
>>> Principally which rule caused the message to be deferred, I think.
>> OK. I'll see what I can do...
> Fantastic, many thanks :-)
That would be useful, but if I dare mention it there's one other datum
that would be good to have - the message length. The main reason for
deferring a message is that it is big, very big, well OK quite big
then. Usually it turns out to have a pps or wmf attachment which I
can't read on the rpc and can't be bothered to run through !Jess or
transfer to the Mac (which I doubt would read wmf files anyway).
The point is that if I know that the message is just over the size
limit in the defer rule I might accept it, but if it's way over I
would delete it. I can't just have an overriding delete rule because I
sometimes do receive large attachments which are important.
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_ mailto:ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
