[antispam-f] Re: Forwarding (again)
- From: Richard Porter <ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 23:35:53 GMT
On 27 Dec 2006 Harriet Bazley wrote:
> On 27 Dec 2006 as I do recall,
> Richard Porter wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Anyway, having diverted all the spam detected by AntiSpam but not
>> marked as spam by PlusNet, I'd like to know if there's a way to mark
>> messages so that they can be filtered into the Spam folder in MPro.
>> That way they could be bounced en masse with all the other spam picked
>> up by SpamStamp.
>>
>> I can't see an obvious way of doing this. One possibility could be to
>> add an X-AntiSpam-Rule header (0 for defaulted messages) so that I can
>> filter on the rule number being over a certain value.
> How about configuring the X-AntiSpam-Action header to be on, then
> filtering in Messenger on "X-AntiSpam-Action = 'divert'"?
Thanks. I hadn't spotted that. Of course it still means that I have to
go through all the diverts and accept them. In that case if a message
is diverted and then accepted I assume the X-AntiSpam-Action header
will still say "divert"? What I really need is a method of accepting
mail and marking it Spam.
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_ mailto:ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
