[antispam-f] Re: Combining rules
- From: Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:52:11 +0200
In article <4eefef03eftricia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tricia Garner <tricia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08 Jun, in article
> <gemini.jjc01q00cjqap019w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Jeremy Nicoll - freelists <jn.flists.73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Tricia Garner <tricia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Ah, thanks. Actually, I want to divert incoming mail for a mailing list
> > > so
> > > would DIVERT To: = *list name* do it?
> > It might do, but not if eg any of your list subscribers send any
> > contributions TO: someone, CC: the list or even BCC it. You need to
> > look at the headers of the mails as you receive them from your ISP to see
> > what they are guaranteed to contain. You might be better looking for the
> > list subscription address (ie where people are sending stuff to) inside a
> > Received: header (as demon will put the address they are actually
> > delivering the mail to in the topmost one of those). The values in To:
> > and CC: are not reliable.
> Yes, I see what you mean. I will have a go at that.
The pseudo header keyword Recipient which was added in version 1.59 may
be of use to you.
Regards,
Frank
P.S. I just noticed the Recipient link on the StrongHelp Index page
takes you to a less than useful place (need to fix that...). The
page Rules->Syntax->Recipient is probably more informative. It even
has an example rule using Divert...
Other related posts:
