[antispam-f] Re: Broken pipe in lists
- From: Jeremy C B Nicoll <Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:27:48 +0000 (GMT)
In article <4e9d44424asteve.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Steven Pampling <steve.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 29 Dec, Jeremy C B Nicoll <Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In article <4e9b3ff7fdsteve.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Steven Pampling <steve.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Same principle, different character --> use ".mx ("
> > Why look for the "("? What's wrong with just looking for the two cases
> > ".mx>" and ".mx " ?
> he already stated that there were instances where .mx occurred where
> it wasn't a valid delete the "(" adds extra checking.
No he didn't. His example was
"Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ..."
where - I agree - a search for *.mx* would indeed be useless.
But there's no reason why *.mx * could not be used.
--
Jeremy C B Nicoll, Edinburgh, Scotland - my opinions are my own.
Other related posts:
