[antispam-f] Re: Blank lines in headers
- From: Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:34:53 +0200
In article <4e1ef1a231Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jeremy C B Nicoll <Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> However it's probably significant that when AS is testing headers it
> looks for that blank line to mark the end of the headers, during a
> download it looks for the 5-character sequence:
> <CR><LF>.<CR><LF>
> which means that it just skips past blank lines even if there's more
> of those than should strictly speaking be in the headers.
Actually, when testing, AntiSpam will continue to read lines until the
dot sequence. It just won't test any lines following a blank line unless
BodyTextLines is zero or - if it isn't - BodyTextAsHeader is on.
Richard's AntiSpam has BodyTextLines 10 and BodyTextAsHeader off (at
least it did when we discussed this issue earlier), so that explains why
the spurious blank line is a problem. What it doesn't explain is the
blank line itself.
Regards,
Frank
Other related posts:
