In article <4f2c13b50dantispam@xxxxxxxxx>, Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In article <4f2c04b894GroverR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > Rod at Orpheusmail <GroverR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [snip] >> Before I went away I had had a similar problem with v1.59.7 and then with >> v1.60.a5. When I came back from holiday I had a lot of emails waiting to >> be downloaded and having problems with v1.60.a5 I reverted to v1.58.3 >> which was stable - I had been using it for some time. >> I then experimented with the various versions. I cannot remember the exact >> sequence of events but on some occasions when it crashed I swapped to the >> stable version to download the mail. This is why an older version is being >> started. When it crashed I didn't get the "Stopping AntiSpam " message in >> the log. > Yes, I'd already come to that conclusion. >> I also ran v1.60 (29-09-2007) earlier today and it downloaded all 112 >> messages and exited without a problem! > Could be that was just luck. There's a bug in 1.60 which can cause trouble > for anyone using AntiSpam with none of the options from the top four rows > of the Choices window's Scan frame set. Most revisions of 1.59 are affected > as well. However, it is possible to run the program with these settings > without experiencing any problems. That is, this bug isn't always triggered. >> Received, the modified files Frank. I haven't had a chance to try them but >> will tonight (I away again this weekend!). I've just dowloaded 421 messages with no problems - I was using the files you sent me Frank. > Revision 1 of version 1.60 will be available later this week. This will > probably include the same !RunImage as I sent you. OK. It's a bit late so I'll download Rev 1 tomorrow and see how I get on with it. Many thanks for your help, Kind regards, Rod -- GroverR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx