In article <gemini.jpb000000f2hi006k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Nicoll - freelists <jn.flists.73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Rod at Orpheusmail <GroverR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In article <4f2b11801dantispam@xxxxxxxxx>, Frank de Bruijn > > <antispam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What's in the log files? > > > > 30 Sep 08:47:12 010 Starting AntiSpam 1.60.a5 (18-02-2007) > > 30 Sep 08:47:12 100 AutoRun > > 30 Sep 08:47:12 100 Starting run - all boxes > > 30 Sep 08:47:12 100 Box 1: Orpheus > > 30 Sep 09:33:39 010 Starting AntiSpam 1.60.a5 (18-02-2007) > Should there have been a log line saying that the first-started AS has > stopped, before it's started again? Or does a "stopped" log line only > happen in certain circumstances? It should always be there. But if the program crashed 'violently'... > > 30 Sep 09:33:39 100 AutoRun > > 30 Sep 09:33:40 100 Starting run - all boxes > > 30 Sep 09:33:40 100 Box 1: Orpheus > > 30 Sep 09:34:50 010 Starting AntiSpam 1.59.5 (03-12-2006) > Why is this older version being started? Yes, I wondered that myself. Could be because Rod wanted to avoid the crash. > > 30 Sep 09:34:50 100 AutoRun > > 30 Sep 09:34:51 100 Starting run - all boxes > > 30 Sep 09:34:51 100 Box 1: Orpheus > > 30 Sep 09:35:32 100 Finished box 1 > > 30 Sep 09:35:33 100 Chaining: Run <POPstar$Dir>.!Run > > 30 Sep 09:36:27 010 Stopping AntiSpam 1.59.5 (03-12-2006) > Here's a stop line, but why no similar stop lines earlier? Probably because the program crashed - strangely without logging anything - and the code that enters the 'Stopping' line into the log was never reached. Regards, Frank