[antispam-f] Re: "Application has gone wrong."

  • From: Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:28:22 +0200

In article <gemini.jpb000000f2hi006k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
   Jeremy Nicoll - freelists <jn.flists.73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rod at Orpheusmail <GroverR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In article <4f2b11801dantispam@xxxxxxxxx>, Frank de Bruijn
> > <antispam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > What's in the log files?
> >
> > 30 Sep 08:47:12 010 Starting AntiSpam 1.60.a5 (18-02-2007)
> > 30 Sep 08:47:12 100 AutoRun
> > 30 Sep 08:47:12 100 Starting run - all boxes
> > 30 Sep 08:47:12 100 Box 1: Orpheus
> > 30 Sep 09:33:39 010 Starting AntiSpam 1.60.a5 (18-02-2007)

> Should there have been a log line saying that the first-started AS has
> stopped, before it's started again?  Or does a "stopped" log line only
> happen in certain circumstances?

It should always be there. But if the program crashed 'violently'...

> > 30 Sep 09:33:39 100 AutoRun
> > 30 Sep 09:33:40 100 Starting run - all boxes
> > 30 Sep 09:33:40 100 Box 1: Orpheus
> > 30 Sep 09:34:50 010 Starting AntiSpam 1.59.5 (03-12-2006)

> Why is this older version being started?

Yes, I wondered that myself. Could be because Rod wanted to avoid the
crash.

> > 30 Sep 09:34:50 100 AutoRun
> > 30 Sep 09:34:51 100 Starting run - all boxes
> > 30 Sep 09:34:51 100 Box 1: Orpheus
> > 30 Sep 09:35:32 100 Finished box 1
> > 30 Sep 09:35:33 100 Chaining: Run <POPstar$Dir>.!Run
> > 30 Sep 09:36:27 010 Stopping AntiSpam 1.59.5 (03-12-2006)

> Here's a stop line, but why no similar stop lines earlier?

Probably because the program crashed - strangely without logging
anything - and the code that enters the 'Stopping' line into the log was
never reached.

Regards,
Frank



Other related posts: