[antispam-f] Re: AntiSpam 1.62
- From: Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:11:01 +0200
In article <512b41d493steven.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Steven Pampling <steven.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <512b3a09efantispam@xxxxxxxxx>,
> Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > What error was that exactly? The one to do with different versions?
> As I recall, yes.
> IIRC the code checks the date of the resource file, but why would it
> check the details of a resource file that wasn't applicable to the
> territory set in the machine?
Actually, it never occurred to me that people might want to delete some
of the files, even if they are not needed in a particular territory.
The program checks the integrity of the entire package and it will
continue to do so, because I can never be certain that a user will want
to use - and continue to use - the default language set for his or her
machine. E.g. I use the English version of some programs, because the
Dutch translation is so bad it makes my toes curl.
Regards,
Frank
Other related posts:
