[antispam-f] Re: AntiSpam 1.58.2
- From: Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:58:19 +0200
In article <c74f58504e.harriet@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Given a Rule "Delete Body @ twoticks" and a user function
> DEF FN@twoticks
> *Report d$
> IF INSTR(d$,"''")>0 THEN OSCLI"Report ticks":=TRUE
> =FALSE
> am I right in thinking that *all* messages eventually accepted by
> default - e.g. having gone through all the rules and found no match -
> ought to be reporting lines of body text with the above debugging
> present, whether they actually match the search string or not?
Yes, as long as there are non empty lines in the first X body lines
(where X is the number of body lines to process) and the option to treat
those body lines as header lines is off.
> They do whenever I test them in the Trial window, but most of them don't
> seem to print anything to the Reporter window while actually being
> downloaded, which seems odd.
The trialling code is similar but not identical to the testing code (and
I've already spotted something that could be improved - in the trialling
code...).
Your findings suggest a bug in the testing code. I'll investigate
further as soon as possible.
Regards,
Frank
Other related posts:
