[antispam-f] Re: AntiSpam 1.58.2

  • From: Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:35:39 +0100

On 2 Aug 2006 as I do recall,
          Harriet Bazley wrote:

> On 2 Aug 2006 as I do recall,
>           Frank de Bruijn wrote:


> > The 'raw data dumps'[1] you sent, don't indicate any particular problem
> > at the 'incoming data' level. What do the mailbox logs say?
> > 
> Not a lot....

Given a Rule "Delete Body @ twoticks" and a user function

DEF FN@twoticks
*Report d$
IF INSTR(d$,"''")>0 THEN OSCLI"Report ticks":=TRUE

am I right in thinking that *all* messages eventually accepted by
default - e.g. having gone through all the rules and found no match -
ought to be reporting lines of body text with the above debugging
present, whether they actually match the search string or not?
They do whenever I test them in the Trial window, but most of them don't
seem to print anything to the Reporter window while actually being
downloaded, which seems odd.

Harriet Bazley                     ==  Loyaulte me lie ==

Joseph Stalin's grave was a Communist Plot.

Other related posts: