[antispam-f] Re: AntiSpam 1.58.2

  • From: Frank de Bruijn <antispam@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:42:21 +0200

In article <d06ad64f4e.harriet@xxxxxxxxxx>,
   Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm seeing a constant stream of e-mails downloaded by default that
> ought to be deleted by a body test rule that simply checks for the
> presence of a double apostrophe - and which *do* show up as triggering
> that rule when subsequently run through the Trial window after download!

> I inserted additional Reporter instructions into the user test in
> question which strongly suggest - even more suspiciously - that lines at
> the end of the header are being tested instead of the start of the body
> text.   But I honestly can't see any difference between the debug logs
> of the ones that *are* correctly trapped and the ones that aren't.

> (Logs attached by e-mail;  not sure how the mailing list treats
> attachments.)

The 'raw data dumps'[1] you sent, don't indicate any particular problem
at the 'incoming data' level. What do the mailbox logs say?


[1] That's really all they are. The current version of the command line
    debug function doesn't provide any information about how the data is

Other related posts: