[amayausers] Re: Software File Extension
- From: "E. Orantes" <e3m@xxxxxxx>
- To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:47:27 -0500
Cheryl,
In short, to answer your question,... If your options are CND versus
EXP, opt for the CND. CND is an older style and comparable to the new OFM
file format which is what you would have if you were digitizing it yourself.
Anytime you switch formats or convert the file, there's a good chance of
changing the stitch count because you are in fact changing the file.
Convert the file or change formats enough times and you won't like what your
machine sews. Stick with CND or OFM when possible and use EXP when that is
your only option.
Good luck,
Ed
Ed & Maralien Orantes
E.M. Broidery
900 Terry Parkway, Ste. 200
New Orleans, La. 70056
504-EMBROID ery (504-362-7643)
-----Original Message-----
From: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Cheryl Rotter
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:24 PM
To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [amayausers] Software File Extension
This may seem like a silly question, but I am wondering since I send most
of my digitizing out to someone overseas due to price constraints, what
format should I be asking for: Melco condensed (.cnd) or Melco expanded
(.exp)? What is the difference and why do the files change stitch count etc
when I switch to wireframe? Thanks for the time.
Cheryl Rotter
Team Sports Ink
5111 Grumann Dr. Ste #1B
Carson City, NV 89706
775-884-3550
Other related posts:
