[amayausers] Re: 2006 Version 7.00.18
- From: "Linen Barn" <linen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:42:09 -0800
Terri,
It mostly depends on the font. On the first part of the lettering its going
to do regular columns so you can only go as big as it will sew nicely. I
don't think I have gone over 2" until the columns start getting too wide.
Really depends on the font though.
Aaron Sargent
The Linen Barn
linen@xxxxxxxxxxx
541-770-2957
Medford, OR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee or Terri Hoover" <lhoover2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:12 AM
Subject: [amayausers] Re: 2006 Version 7.00.18
> Aaron,
>
> Thanks for sharing. I would love to sew these files, as I've been trying
> to
> do large lettering and have been using a fill as opposed to satin. But
> the
> fill does not get the look that I really want. What is the largest size
> you
> would use this?
>
> lhoover2@xxxxxxx
>
> Thanks,
>
> Terri Hoover
> Embroidery Creations
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:amayausers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Linen Barn
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:45 AM
> To: amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [amayausers] Re: 2006 Version 7.00.18
>
> Ok, its not a true split-satin but it gives the same look and is very
> effective up to a point. What I do is set my lettering how I want it, for
> example Full Block names straight accross the back of sweatshirts. Full
> Block, 2" tall, zig-zag underlay of 15 density and 90% width, main
> density
> at 4 and 100%. Then you just copy/past the lettering onto itself and
> change
>
> the settings to no underlay and the main at 10 density and 30% width. It
> will still sew the first part in normal satin stitches so you can't go too
> big this way but the 2nd lettering at 30% width ties down the wide columns
> so you will never have to worry about the large satin stitching comming
> out.
>
> This will save you tons of stitches over converting to fill and gives a
> nicer look in my opinion. I use this for names on back of stuff and for
> alot of larger lettering on jacket backs.
>
> I have 3 files saved, 1 in normal satin, one in split-satin (2006
> software)
> and one in my split satin. If anyone wants to see the difference I can
> send
>
> them to you. They are in .exp format so you wont be able to see any
> settings cause those of you with the older software wouldnt be able to
> open
> them and if I save as older version it wont save the new split-column.
>
> Hope I explained this ok, if not feel free to ask any questions. I have
> been using this lettering for 5 years now and it works great :)
>
> Aaron Sargent
> The Linen Barn
> linen@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 541-770-2957
> Medford, OR
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Toni" <tlwetter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <amayausers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:29 AM
> Subject: [amayausers] Re: 2006 Version 7.00.18
>
>
>> Aaron,
>>
>> Can you give the directions for doing the split satin for those of us
>> that
>> are DS challenged (have the older versions)?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Toni Wetter
>> tlwetter@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Classic Embroidery, Inc.
>> Almont, MI
>> (586) 255-4065 (cell phone)
>> (810) 798-2160 (leave message)
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>>
>>> love the auto-split columns feature. I used to do this all the time the
>>> hard way cause it looks so much better that converting to fill but Melco
>>> made it real easy :)
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
