I will sign also. Sent you mail with my info.
--
Julia Pond
juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019, at 10:07 PM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote:
aem-vanc Digest Wed, 03 Jul 2019 Volume: 01 Issue: 013
In This Issue:
[aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
[aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
[aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
[aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 07:26:08 -0700
Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
From: Gay Maclellan <gay@xxxxxxxxxx>
We will be a part of your request.
Robert and Gay MacLellan
PO Box 61467
Vancouver, WA 98666
360-609-7330
gay@xxxxxxxxxx
Gay MacLellan
Cell Phone:
360-609-7330
Medford Office Address:
3126 State St. Ste. 200
Medford, OR 97504
Vancouver Mailing Address:
PO Box 61467
Vancouver, WA 98666
On Jul 2, 2019, at 4:28 PM, treytennyson3 <treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Good afternoon, fellow investors. My name is Trey Tennyson. My mother and I
have very large investments in the AEM 600 fund, but no others.
I am a recently retired trial attorney from Vancouver. As I relocated to
Arizona a few years ago, I hired Vancouver attorney Tim Dack to represent
my interests in the AEM receivership.
After reviewing the legal documents (pleadings) that American Equities
filed with the court to start the receivership, I became convinced that the
receivership had been improperly started. The documents that were filed
with the court showed that American Equities (as Manager of each of the
different funds) had made what is called an assignment of assets to the
Receiver in favor of its creditors. This is a fancy way of saying that
American Equities simply transferred our assets to a third party who will
now act as our new fund Manager. Unfortunately, this new Manager (the
Receiver) wants to be paid $500 per hour and wants its attorneys (((Miller
Nash) to be paid $500 per hour. These fees are well in excess of the .50
percent management fee we were paying to American Equities.
As you all know, each fund is set up as a separate Washington Limited
Liability Company(LLC). The investors in each LLC became its members and
also its creditors. LLCs in Washington are governed by statutes. The most
important statute relates to member voting rights, and provides that ALL
members must consent to any dissolution (dissolving) of the LLC or to any
action of the LLC Manager which is outside the ordinary course of business
of the LLC. The receivership would effectively dissolve each of the LLCs
and it is clearly not part of the normal course of the business which is
managing real estate investmen
Last week, Tim Dack filed an objection to the Receiver`s request for
compensation (including attorneys fees, receivers fees, accountants, etc)
on the grounds that the LLC investors did not vote to approve the
receivership and it is therefore illegal. We also onjected on the grounds
that the receiver and his attorneys were requesting that they be paid
different amounts of money from each LLC for work that they claimed
benefitted each fund equally. This could cause some funds to pay far more
than their fair share and hurt the investors in these funds.
My mother and I were the only investors to file an objection to the
Receivers request for compensation. However, I am sure many of you share
these same concerns and would agree with these positions. None of us voted
to set up an expensive receivership. What we need is a new Manager of the
LLC funds who is competent , will work for a reasonable fee and can
gradually liquidate the funds in the way that returns the most money to the
investors.
As a result of our objection, the Receiver will have to file a legal motion
and set a hearing in front of Judge Gregerson. This will be done in the
next week or two and the hearing will likely be in late July.
The Receiver has also scheduled a hearing in July where he is requesting
approval from the Judge to sell property owned by all the LLCs. We are
objecting to this request because the receivership was not properly
approved by the investors.
My attorney has requested that I find other investors in the AEM 600 fund
and the other funds who will join in writing and support our objections.
This will show the Judge that many investors object to the receivership and
the sky high fees that come with it. If you are willing to sign such a
statement, please email me with your name, address and telephone and either
myself or my attorney will contact you. With our combined effort, the
Receivership can be terminated and a new Manager properly appointed that
will return a much larger amount to the investors.
Trey Tennyson
treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx
Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
------------------------------
From: Paty <pat.witt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 07:35:16 -0700
Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
U so FUNNY
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 2, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Neil & Marilyn <nmr1311b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So who's talking Troy or Trey? Should I find it confusing? Yes :-)
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:58 PM treytennyson3 <treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Thanks for the support. Either Tim or I will be in touch soon.
Trey
Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
-------- Original message --------
From: "Troy Rendon(Redacted sender "trendon74" for DMARC)"
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 7/2/19 7:20 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: aem-vanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
Thank you Trey. I’ll join in signing in support of the objection
Troy Rendon
3512 E Mill Plain Blvd
Vancouver, WA 98661
360.281.4216
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 2, 2019, at 4:28 PM, treytennyson3 <treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Good afternoon, fellow investors. My name is Trey Tennyson. My mother and
I have very large investments in the AEM 600 fund, but no others.
I am a recently retired trial attorney from Vancouver. As I relocated to
Arizona a few years ago, I hired Vancouver attorney Tim Dack to represent
my interests in the AEM receivership.
After reviewing the legal documents (pleadings) that American Equities
filed with the court to start the receivership, I became convinced that
the receivership had been improperly started. The documents that were
filed with the court showed that American Equities (as Manager of each of
the different funds) had made what is called an assignment of assets to
the Receiver in favor of its creditors. This is a fancy way of saying
that American Equities simply transferred our assets to a third party who
will now act as our new fund Manager. Unfortunately, this new Manager
(the Receiver) wants to be paid $500 per hour and wants its attorneys
(((Miller Nash) to be paid $500 per hour. These fees are well in excess
of the .50 percent management fee we were paying to American Equities.
As you all know, each fund is set up as a separate Washington Limited
Liability Company(LLC). The investors in each LLC became its members and
also its creditors. LLCs in Washington are governed by statutes. The most
important statute relates to member voting rights, and provides that ALL
members must consent to any dissolution (dissolving) of the LLC or to any
action of the LLC Manager which is outside the ordinary course of
business of the LLC. The receivership would effectively dissolve each of
the LLCs and it is clearly not part of the normal course of the business
which is managing real estate investmen
Last week, Tim Dack filed an objection to the Receiver`s request for
compensation (including attorneys fees, receivers fees, accountants, etc)
on the grounds that the LLC investors did not vote to approve the
receivership and it is therefore illegal. We also onjected on the grounds
that the receiver and his attorneys were requesting that they be paid
different amounts of money from each LLC for work that they claimed
benefitted each fund equally. This could cause some funds to pay far more
than their fair share and hurt the investors in these funds.
My mother and I were the only investors to file an objection to the
Receivers request for compensation. However, I am sure many of you share
these same concerns and would agree with these positions. None of us
voted to set up an expensive receivership. What we need is a new Manager
of the LLC funds who is competent , will work for a reasonable fee and
can gradually liquidate the funds in the way that returns the most money
to the investors.
As a result of our objection, the Receiver will have to file a legal
motion and set a hearing in front of Judge Gregerson. This will be done
in the next week or two and the hearing will likely be in late July.
The Receiver has also scheduled a hearing in July where he is requesting
approval from the Judge to sell property owned by all the LLCs. We are
objecting to this request because the receivership was not properly
approved by the investors.
My attorney has requested that I find other investors in the AEM 600 fund
and the other funds who will join in writing and support our objections.
This will show the Judge that many investors object to the receivership
and the sky high fees that come with it. If you are willing to sign such
a statement, please email me with your name, address and telephone and
either myself or my attorney will contact you. With our combined effort,
the Receivership can be terminated and a new Manager properly appointed
that will return a much larger amount to the investors.
Trey Tennyson
treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx
Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 07:49:45 -0700
Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
From: treytennyson3 <treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx>
N��*.����)em��rH�������z�)y�"� "��6���� ��j
(t��ˋa�:��'����l�jV��6���������)ږg��� �������&�f�1�%zYZ�����f��w��6�{����}���tҗ��������8^���zƫ{��)��Ǭ�����җ�q�황ځ鞞��{�z��k(���.�ן}�-����ج��oy朆����
Ƨv+b��^j�r��ij�h~�^���jW(�� ��ay���w��br���ڂ)��z�Z�觽�-���j�py��N)�i� �W�jz��-�����^E� �����ު笵�+r��z{�*'�)ܖ�b�����{+ y���� ���������r��������s�'�����v�aj�ax�{�+�؝��o���i���yǢ���*Z�ح��az������W�j_��g���(�7���h��^��.��-��m���q�z��v�j�h�w���z����-�x-��m��z��u؟}�ޞ֦������w�~�&y�!,����(�Kaj�a{'%j)�u��y����^i�_�w^�楗/���ӆ+ ��]q��z�&y��v�h���j����aj{az*�j*셪�jwa��m�觽�-��"��^�����3)���jwH����\������춇�槡��rب��-��^q�z�+z������&���jب��� � ���!�����j|�*.��z�^����(�ǫ�Ƨw
.�֠�簊�m�� ��"�*'���6�ޡ����^v�,z۩jw������yǢ���*����j� �睊Ƨ{�� �����
��v�!�+ �j^������
+��+j�����nW�y�uƧ�����e�X��'Z��ay��vȧ��k+aj����^��-�����-�觽�-������ƫz˥��躺��-�����yǢ����Yaj�����y�^��f�ب��ݱ�Z�櫊x"���� &�`xjށ����8b������w���^��m�礢�p��ݶ�y��
"�Yb��rm觕�^&�r�8^E� �������,r��W�j��)��rn�,!z��z++z���ا��i��ڕ���^&�`z�,zYi��^�ܨ�w�o&���^,�����y�ޡ��rا��-�++z�����q��z�^�� �������'��k����&���/y����������̚��+��j�ު笵�m��H~)ݢ�^�)�z�h�ȧ��δ���u�ݶ���~�ݳh�)e����|+�ا��ݲ�i��h����-�����ӆ+0�Yl��-��nv���Z�f��)�z�h����-��az��z+ޮ�b��ݶ��(b��z�aj�(��"���������{��)උ"�{.r���^�����^jǞ�����"� ���ڙ��u�Ƨvץz�h��u譅���ǥ~��ɫm�������'��-ʋ����Z+a��ܢf��^}�+��ay�z+ޮ�b�Ƨm�^�h�jםjwZ��
jv�z�k����&������m��p�Ykz۫���rZ��jj.��h���������:��7��+(����ק�+(�������&I��~�&�!���rM��
------------------------------
From: "Neil & Marilyn" <nmr1311b@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 11:29:10 -0700
Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
Thanks Trey. Neil Rylander 360 903 0055, 1311 NW 131st Way, Apt B,
Vancouver, WA 98685 Please add me to your list. Thx. Neil
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 7:49 AM treytennyson3 <treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Thank you. I will be back in touch after speaking with Tim Dack. Have a
good July 4th!
Trey
Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
-------- Original message --------
From: Gay Maclellan <gay@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 7/3/19 7:26 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: aem-vanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: Status of current objections to Receivership
We will be a part of your request.
Robert and Gay MacLellan
PO Box 61467
Vancouver, WA 98666
360-609-7330
gay@xxxxxxxxxx
Gay MacLellan
Cell Phone:
360-609-7330
Medford Office Address:
3126 State St. Ste. 200
Medford, OR 97504
Vancouver Mailing Address:
PO Box 61467
Vancouver, WA 98666
On Jul 2, 2019, at 4:28 PM, treytennyson3 <treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Good afternoon, fellow investors. My name is Trey Tennyson. My mother
and I have very large investments in the AEM 600 fund, but no others.
I am a recently retired trial attorney from Vancouver. As I relocated to
Arizona a few years ago, I hired Vancouver attorney Tim Dack to represent
my interests in the AEM receivership.
After reviewing the legal documents (pleadings) that American Equities
filed with the court to start the receivership, I became convinced that the
receivership had been improperly started. The documents that were filed
with the court showed that American Equities (as Manager of each of the
different funds) had made what is called an assignment of assets to the
Receiver in favor of its creditors. This is a fancy way of saying that
American Equities simply transferred our assets to a third party who will
now act as our new fund Manager. Unfortunately, this new Manager (the
Receiver) wants to be paid $500 per hour and wants its attorneys (((Miller
Nash) to be paid $500 per hour. These fees are well in excess of the .50
percent management fee we were paying to American Equities.
As you all know, each fund is set up as a separate Washington Limited
Liability Company(LLC). The investors in each LLC became its members and
also its creditors. LLCs in Washington are governed by statutes. The
most important statute relates to member voting rights, and provides that
ALL members must consent to any dissolution (dissolving) of the LLC or to
any action of the LLC Manager which is outside the ordinary course of
business of the LLC. The receivership would effectively dissolve each of
the LLCs and it is clearly not part of the normal course of the business
which is managing real estate investmen
Last week, Tim Dack filed an objection to the Receiver`s request for
compensation (including attorneys fees, receivers fees, accountants, etc)
on the grounds that the LLC investors did not vote to approve the
receivership and it is therefore illegal. We also onjected on the grounds
that the receiver and his attorneys were requesting that they be paid
different amounts of money from each LLC for work that they claimed
benefitted each fund equally. This could cause some funds to pay far more
than their fair share and hurt the investors in these funds.
My mother and I were the only investors to file an objection to the
Receivers request for compensation. However, I am sure many of you share
these same concerns and would agree with these positions. None of us voted
to set up an expensive receivership. What we need is a new Manager of the
LLC funds who is competent , will work for a reasonable fee and can
gradually liquidate the funds in the way that returns the most money to the
investors.
As a result of our objection, the Receiver will have to file a legal
motion and set a hearing in front of Judge Gregerson. This will be done in
the next week or two and the hearing will likely be in late July.
The Receiver has also scheduled a hearing in July where he is requesting
approval from the Judge to sell property owned by all the LLCs. We are
objecting to this request because the receivership was not properly
approved by the investors.
My attorney has requested that I find other investors in the AEM 600 fund
and the other funds who will join in writing and support our objections.
This will show the Judge that many investors object to the receivership
and the sky high fees that come with it. If you are willing to sign such
a statement, please email me with your name, address and telephone and
either myself or my attorney will contact you. With our combined effort,
the Receivership can be terminated and a new Manager properly appointed
that will return a much larger amount to the investors.
Trey Tennyson
treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx
Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
------------------------------
End of aem-vanc Digest V1 #13
*****************************
