Four of us attended this morning- nothing on docket. Waste of time except that
it was a house private time to discuss things and options.
Sent from Ila's iPhone with a mind of its own.
On Aug 6, 2019, at 7:02 PM, Pat Witt <pat.witt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How do we check on that? Would Hamstreet post an upcoming court date on the
web site?
I’ll check and let you know if it’s there. If not how do we know?
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 6, 2019, at 6:09 PM, Judy Johnston <glen.johnston@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
What meeting in 8-16-19? Investors? Haven’t seen anything about that .
Please let me know about it. Thank you, Judy Johnston
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2019, at 5:51 PM, Ed Wilson <ej.wilson62@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Roy,
Personally I think this is a great idea at first glance. I would like to
take a harder look at this option and hear the opinions of others who are
interested. Every day that goes by with the receivership in place is
costing each investor dearly.
Is there another meeting being planned to inform and discuss the
viability of this plan.
Sent from my iPhone
Thanks,
Ed Wilson
503-572-1324
On Aug 6, 2019, at 5:31 PM, treytennyson3 <treytennyson3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No it does not. The receivership acts to suspend legal actions against
the persons and entities that are named as parties only. Ross Miles,
American Equities and American Eagle Mortgage Management are not parties
and can be sued now. That is what Gary Grenley is doing on behalf of the
Nichols, his clients.
Trey Tennyson
Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
-------- Original message --------
From: Pat Witt <pat.witt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 8/6/19 5:19 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: aem-vanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: Proposal for formation of new LLC and the end of
Receivership
We have a question....
Does the Receivership have to end before a lawsuit can be brought against
Miles by the or any investor??
Thank you,
Pat Witt and Bob Kalmbach
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 6, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Julia Pond <juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mr Thompson,
Very creative thinking, I like it.
However, 10 to 25 cents on the dollar on a bunch of assets whose value is
low to unknown is not going to entice the receiver (much less his/Ross’
counsel) away from a million dollars in billings. I think at this rate,
between them, they will bill a half million by year end, easily, and will
lengthen the engagement by any means necessary.
However, I am in favor of anything that dissolves the receivership. I
think at this point our only hope of that is a criminal referral.
I reiterate my previous assertion that no ethical person would have
agreed to take this on as an engagement.
--
Julia Pond
juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Michael Banks wrote:
Dear American Equities/American Eagle Investors:
As some of you may know, my name is Roy Thompson and I'm the senior
partner in the Lake Oswego law firm, Thompson Bogran PC. My firm
arranged, at the behest of my clients, Rob and Eva Johnson, the recent
July 25th meeting at which I spoke and in which some of you
participated, either personally or on the phone at the Oregon State Bar.
I and some other attorneys and investors are considering forming an LLC
called "American Equities Recovery, LLC" which is intended to take
advantage of a ruling from the Court on August 2nd. During that
hearing, the Court approved of the process which is sometimes called
"bottom feeding," which essentially allows other investors or third
parties to purchase and/or sell the investment interests of others as
part of the Receivership. I propose to create the AER in order to make
an offer to pay the Receiver between 10 to 25 cents on the dollar for
all assets in the receivership. The offer would be in a form of a Note,
payable in 5 years at 3% interest. Once formed, we would file a motion
with the Court to accept this Note in payment, which would effectively
end the need for a Receivership, thus ending the current need for legal
and receivership fees.
This would also avoid the necessity of placing your money in a
litigation fund because I would propose that your payment to the LLC
would make you a member of the LLC. The LLC would in turn have a
management committee to oversee the hiring of the legal team and the
prosecution of any actions against Mr. Miles and any other persons or
entities the legal team believes should be named in any future actions.
In addition to the management committee I believe an advisory committee
of investors also be informed and kept in "the loop" on all legal
proceedings.
I hope this proposal finds you all well and I look forward to your input.
Roy B. Thompson/hrs