The court is not required to find that it was a Ponzi scheme in order to
manage the Receivership, so this question will not ever be litigated or
determined. But that finding is not necessary. An investor must only
show that this investment loss was a result of theft rather than
mismanagement. This renders the 3k per year limit on investment losses
inapplicable.. The Declaration of forensic accountant Michael Ueltzen
contains all the necessary specifics. The evidence is overwhelming. I
have not tried to amend prior tax returns yet. However, I have been
successful in using my losses to offset all my taxable income in 2019 and
2020.
Trey Tennyson
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021, 9:25 PM Ila Stanek <timeout29@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I believe in one of the Hamstreet documents it was declared a Ponzi
scheme.
Sent from Ila's iPhone with a mind of its own.
On Jun 24, 2021, at 7:35 PM, Ed Wilson <ej.wilson62@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:absolutely don't believe this is a fair application. However I'm not sure
Bob,
I'm one of those as well as my sister and my mothers estate. I
there is much that can be done. Also I'm understanding after talking to two
tax advisors and an attorney that unless the case is declared a Ponzi
scheme we are only allowed to amend tax returns back 3 years. If you have
other information or have discovered different I would be very interested
in your source of the information.
from those of you whom are members of the elite group of 44 that the
Sent from my iPhone
Thank you,
Ed Wilson
503-572-1324
On Jun 18, 2021, at 5:07 PM, ROBERT LAWS <rklaws@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I hope you have all survived the pandemic. I am interested in hearing
receiver has determined will not receive any distribution. Please contact
me if you have any concerns that this might possibly not be a fair and
equitable plan for all. The deadline for any action is very soon, June 29th.
Bob Laws
rklaws@xxxxxxxxxxx
