I agree 100%. Cant tell you how many times in 2014 i was told how safe this
was since it was a collective fund so much less risk. And i put my life
savings in retirement in this fund. Their personal assets need to be part of
this. We need a law firm that will go after this aggressively.
The meeting needs to happen soon and a plan of action. A list of people that
want to be included.
Belinda
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S®6 active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: "LARRY MANSFIELD(Redacted sender
"larryman44" for DMARC)" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 6/26/19 6:14 PM
(GMT-06:00) To: aem-vanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: AEM Investor
Representation
On my first experience once law firm as a joint effort, charges need to be
brought against them , this money has to be accounted for and hamstreet isn’t
going to do that only liquidate things like he said, hamstreet represents AEM
not us. On my ordeal once law was involved all there personal properties were
seized and added to the kitty, I can’t tell you how many times miles said they
were examined and everything was great, if a person could not make a profit
the last nine years in real estate especially at 60% Loan to value, something
is very wrong
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 26, 2019, at 3:57 PM, Eva Johnson <los-johnsons@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Larry,yes, I know that you have gone through this before. I want to know what
options we have to get the best results possible. I’m aware of the direness of
the whole ordeal, I just want to fight back.
On Jun 26, 2019, at 2:25 PM, (Redacted sender "larryman44" for DMARC)
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eva, I unfortunately lost money in a scheme like this years ago and at the
meeting can tell you exactly how the receivership and costs will go, the people
behind this for me the first time are in prison now
-----Original Message-----
From: Eva Johnson <los-johnsons@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: aem-vanc <aem-vanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Jun 26, 2019 1:14 pm
Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: AEM Investor Representation
Yes, that option needs to be discussed as well.
On Jun 26, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Julia Pond <juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I understand all that. But the benefit of collectively bringing another lawsuit
needs to be explained.
--
Julia Pond
juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, at 12:49 PM, bfranke wrote:
Julie, there is the receivership for the assets that are ours collectively and
then there is a lawsuit for negligence on the part of AEM and it’s owners. The
receivership would happen first I would assume but I think a lawsuit needs to
be filed for afterwards and the losses still sustained. Maybe not everyone
wants to pursue this but whoever does could go the route that Troy is
presenting. Not a class action due to the cost.
Belinda
From: aem-vanc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:aem-vanc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Julia Pond
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 2:25 PM
To: aem-vanc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aem-vanc] Re: AEM Investor Representation
A class action lawsuit will benefit only the attorneys. A receivership at least
recovers in proportion to claims with lower costs.
I wouldn’t be interested in being a class member of a lawsuit (which would be
in addition to the pending one!) until or unless someone can tell me
definitively that my recovery will be greater than the receivership (with a
truly independent receiver) AFTER attorneys’ fees are paid.
--
Julia Pond
juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Troy Rendon wrote:
I for one, am interested in pooling resources and choosing a law firm to
represent us all.
Do we have a law firm interested in taking on this case on behalf of us all?
I believe a potential contingency arraignment would be beneficial. Where a
hypothetical law firm agrees to take a percentage of winning if successful.
A true class action arrangement often seems to mostly benefit of the law firm
where any winnings are mostly chewed up by the attorneys and anything left over
is divided up amongst the class action plaintiff. We are a group of nearly
200 investors. That’s a relatively large group with a large combined network.
Does anyone know a law firm willing to take up our cause under a contingency
arraignment?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Julia Pond <juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
“amount of money” I meant. Darn autocorrect.
--
Julia Pond
juliapond@xxxxxxxxxxx
