Gunther Nikl schrieb: >>> Please note that I build the repository more or less from scratch - I >>>> first put in all the GCC/binutiles/etc vendor sources into own branches >>>> and the applied our patches against them. >>> That sounds like the AmigaOS/m68k binutils support is gone. >> Why? I applied all our CVS changes up to the very recent ones you committed >> lately. > > Somehow I assumed "our patches" meant an (old) diff you had laying around. No. I did a whole "cvs diff" session when I moved the stuff to subversion. >> And I also did a diff of the MAIN trunk of both binutiles directory and >> observed no differences so far. So the /trunk/binutils path should be >> pretty much the same like the one in our subversion repository now. > > Thanks for this clarification. > > BTW, I take it that it would be easy to import other binutils/gcc versions? > I would like to see binutils 2.9.1 and GCC 3.3+. And maybe GCC 2.95.4. Yes, importing gcc 2.95.4 be no problem. As for the odler GCC 3.3+ and binutils 2.9.1 I will have to see how difficult it would be, but since we use subversion now it shouldn't be a big issue anymore. So just tell me exactly what you require, and I will try to import that stuff into our vendor branch. What exactly do you want to achieve by important older GCC/binutils versions? cheers, jens -- Jens Langner Ph: +49-351-4716545 Rißweg 27b 01324 Dresden Jens.Langner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Germany http://www.jens-langner.de/ ______________________________________________________________________________ Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools Listserver help............: mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP