On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:22:54AM +0200, Andrija Antonijevic wrote: > On 15-Aug-2005, Gunther Nikl wrote: > > >>I thought I'd write it as if -mcrt is "stronger" than -nostdinc, ie. if > >>someone specifies -nostdinc -mcrt=xxx, then -nostdinc should be ignored. > > > > This isn non-intuitive. I expect a -nostd option to omit the standard > > "behaviour" > > Well, one could say "I expect -mcrt=xxx to provide me with the use of xxx > CRT", it depends on the point of view :) Right. The -mcrt= is the first option I know that conflicts with a -nostd option. Now I begin to understand why enhancing GCC is difficult: you always get problems in unexpected areas :-) > Anyway, I do agree that -nostdinc one makes more sense and makes things > easier, so it should be changed. Fine. > > BTW, something similiar should be added in LINK_SPEC for -nostdlib. > > You are right, I missed that for some reason. Adding custom options is difficult ;) > > Looking at the previous mails, yes the issue was removing "-mcrt=default" > > if it is causing too many problems. > > I think it doesn't at the moment, but it might cause them later with > multilib. Let's leave it for now? Yes, its should stay for now. Gunther -- Linux is only free if your time has no value - Jamie Zawinski ______________________________________________________________________________ Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools Listserver help............: mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP