[adtools] Re: Problems building native m68k version of binutils
- From: "Josef.Wegner@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Josef.Wegner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: adtools@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:52:29 +0100
First I want to setup a cross-compiler under linux (adtools binutils and
gcc-3.3.3).
Then I try to build a m68k version of gcc-3.3.3 and binutils. If this
works I install them in UAE and compile some test programs under m68k.
I know there are GG packages for binutils and gcc. But it is still a
good test to check if the binutils changes work.
-Josef
-----Original Message-----
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:14:06 +0100
Subject: [adtools] Re: Problems building native m68k version of binutils
From: Gunther Nikl
To: adtools@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:07:09PM +0100, Josef.Wegner@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
> This are bad news, indeed.
>
> I think this might be a reason to move on and port m68k to gcc 4.0.1.
In the audit trail of the PR there is a proposed path that was
rejected.
Its unknown why this was rejected.
> Or should I try to create native binutils and gcc packages with gcc
> 3.3.3 first?
Can you be a little bit more specific? What are you planning to build
with 3.3.3?
Gunther
______________________________________________________________________________
Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools
Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools
Listserver help............:
mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP
______________________________________________________________________________
Amiga Development tools ML - //www.freelists.org/list/adtools
Homepage...................: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/adtools
Listserver help............: mailto:adtools-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=HELP
Other related posts:
