How often do you actually watch Fox News? Or did before you gave up on them? But that's why I included the JPL link since I figured you wouldn't give Fox any credibility. :-) Ken Schmahl, P.E. wrote: > Fox news! Well, I won't have to read the article then to believe 'em. > > Sorry, but Fox has lost its credibility. I'll have to go back to the > original studies to get the truth on this. > > To be clear, I'm bitter about Fox News, and not you Milt. > ks > > > On 11/16/07, *Milton Scritsmier* <Milton_Scritsmier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:Milton_Scritsmier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Once again, scientific results are coming in showing that the > interaction between the climate and mankind is not nearly so > simple as "An Inconvenient Truth" would have us believe. This > time it has to do with the shrinking of the arctic ice cap over > the last few decades (and by the way, how often do you hear > that the antarctic ice cap is now at a maximum?). According to > two independent scientific studies, it appears that the arctic > ice cap has gone through rapid periods of shrinking and > expanding over at least the last few hundred years, well before > mankind had any real effect on the climate. > > For a quick overview of the first study, here is what Fox News > Channel's "Grapevine" on "Special Report with Brit Hume" had to > say: > > === > > What NASA Says Is Really Happening to the Arctic Ice Cap > > Friday, November 16, 2007 > > By Brit Hume > Fox News Channel > > Perfectly Natural > > Many global warming activists point to changes in the arctic > icecap as proof of the dangerous effects of man-made global > warming. Now a report from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory > says those changes are in fact the result of natural ocean > circulation patterns. A team of scientists used satellite and > deep-sea pressure gauge data to monitor ocean patterns. > > Says team leader James Morison of the University of > Washington's Polar Science Center — "Our study confirms many > changes seen in upper Arctic Ocean circulation in the 1990s > were mostly decadal in nature, rather than trends caused by > global warming." > > === > > The "Grapevine" report does leave out that Dr. Morison believes > that mankind-induced global warming is accelerating the > oscillations in the arctic ice cap. The JPL news release on Dr. > Morison's findings is at > > http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2007-131 > > Significantly, another independent study also shows that the > arctic ice cap has gone through rapid oscillations. Dr. Simon > Belt and his team from the University of Plymouth in England > looked for a particular lipid produced by an algae that can > only live in sea ice. As this lipid is produced, it drifts down > to the ocean bottom and becomes embedded in the sediment. As > the sediment builds up over time, the amount of this lipid in > each layer of the sediment gives an indication of the amount of > algae at that time, and hence the amount of sea ice. By > collecting various "sediment cores" and measuring the lipid, > Dr. Belt and his team have found that the arctic ice cap has > varied greatly in the last several hundred years. Dr. Belt > believes that mankind's recent changes to the environment may > be making it harder for arctic ice to recover from its latest > retreat. But he also notes that "Significantly, periods of sea > ice cover frequently coincide with dramatic changes to human > populations due to famines and illnesses." In other words, > whether or not mankind is changing the climate, the climate > still has had a powerful effect on mankind. > > A good article about Dr. Belt's research can be found at > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7044808.stm > > If you get HDNet on satellite or cable, check out this week's > "Dan Rather Reports" entitled "A Crack in the Ice". There's an > interview with Dr. Belt on the research vessel where he did his > study discussing his results and showing his team collecting > and analyzing sediment. > > >