Hello All:
Again from the perspective of the forest instead of the individual trees...
Our Country's Courts are supposed to act in accordance with the Rule of Law.The
Progressive Globalist Insurgency has replaced the Rule of Law with the "RULE OF
MAN"and "MIGHT MAKES RIGHT".
RULE OF MAN IS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS. Progressive RULE OF MAN is biased
towardadvancing the Progressive Globalist Revolution, protecting and rewarding
its allies and punishingthe enemies that expose and oppose it.
Yet this PROGRESSIVE RULE OF MAN stands as law because they have people with
guns toprotect them and enforce their rulings.
To go to their courts and expect to win on issues that fundamentally derail the
Progressive Globalist Revolution, serves only 1 useful purpose... In losing the
matter, you provided yet one more piece ofevidence that WE THE PEOPLE have
exhausted our PEACEFUL REMEDIES, as our US Founder's require per their roadmap
for dealing with tyranny.
In every stage of these Oppressions we have Petitioned for Redress
in the most humble Terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by
repeated Injury. A Prince, whose Character is thus marked by every act which
may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the Ruler of a free People. Nor
have we been wanting in Attentions to our British Brethren. We have warned them
from Time to Time of Attempts by their Legislature to extend an unwarrantable
Jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the Circumstances of our
Emigration and Settlement here. We have appealed to their native Justice and
Magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the Ties of our common Kindred to
disavow these Usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our Connections
and Correspondence. They too have been deaf to the Voice of Justice and of
Consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the Necessity, which denounces
our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of Mankind, Enemies in War,
in Peace, Friends. US
Declaration of Independence
Our Country is in the middle of an unconventional revolution as a result of a
paradigmshift away from the traditional revolution/civil war using sudden,
overwhelming force toseize power.
This paradigm shift is even larger than that of the Indians with bows and
arrows fightingthe first European folks with guns...
This revolution by Permeation calls for slow, covert, incremental infiltration
over generationsso no 1 generation experiences enough change to be moved to
resist, revolt or mount a counter-revolution.While the first America revolution
was signaled by the "shot heard around the world", this latestrevolution was
specifically designed not to signal the masses that a revolution is in progress
and theyneed to pick up guns and defend themselves.
Our Courts, Lawyers (BAR), Government Attorneys and Law Enforcement all take
oaths to
"support and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
This is an
Affirmative duty... The following 3 proofs evince that they all have ignored
their oath of office,and therefore are acting under the RULE OF MAN.
1) Courts Failure to hold the 4th Branch Administrative State created under
Progressive President
Woodrow Wilson, unconstitutional and order it be dismantled. (Pages 40-49,
Illiberal Reformers, 2016, Thomas Leonard
http://rebrand.ly/IlliberalReformersThiftBooks) Among other reasons, this
new4th Branch Administrative State was created because Progressive Elites say
the masses are too
stupid to govern themselves. (pages 51-52, Ibid.)
2) Courts abandoning the Pound Principle calling for the overwhelming number of
matters before the Courts be resolved on the Merits and Not Technicalities (
http://rebrand.ly/OnTheMerits ;)
3) Failure of Government Attorneys and Law Enforcement to Arrest Members of the
Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) for sedition and treason. The Rothschild
family were the first to propose a NEW WORLD ORDER under ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.
Rothchilds' frontmen Rockefeller, JP Morgan and Warburg founded the CFR to
pursue these Rothschild goals under the guise of Progressivism.
Clearly, all of this things are unconstitutional and diametrically opposed to
the principles America was founded upon...
So I say again, why would you expect to prevail on matters that materially
impair or oppose the agenda ofthe Progressive Globalist Insurgency and/or not
expect them to ignore them once they consolidate power?
I look forward to your feedback.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Thursday, November 18, 2021, 04:14:38 PM CST, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
oh i see now its black mail. I get it.. well thanks ill just skip that part
then. Some of us make a living doing this you know.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 2:17 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You can go back and listen to Cary's jurisdiction calls. The information is
there. Seems like I asked you about a change of status document and you did
not want to share unless you got $100.00. Doesn't seem quite fair to share
w/out a gift. Maybe we could exchange ideas without any requests for $$$.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:13 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and what was carys' response.. the one you sent it would be nice.. *letter?
word for word :-) Thanks.. It would be a great learning too for us :-)
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 1:08 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This was my response to a Letter 3219 (SC/CG) dated 12-15-2020 from our lovely
friends at the IRS of course saying they wanted $$$:
Thepurpose of this letter is to give notice of non-acceptance and to decline
youroffer of contract dated December 15, 2020, due to lack of jurisdiction.
Denise D Davis, youhave thirty days (30) to prove that you havejurisdiction to
even contact us let alone try to assess a tax against us since weare not within
your territory.
You, Denise D Davis, are responsible for all the property you areunlawfully
attempting to demand through fraud if you cannot prove jurisdiction.
TheConstitution for the United States of America at Article 1; Section 8;
Clause17 limits the jurisdiction of the United States to the ten miles square
of theDistrict and other needful buildings and places lawfully ceded by the
statelegislatures.
Denise D Davis, please provide the evidence the COMMISSIONER OFINTERNAL REVENUE
relies on to show the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is not inviolation of Article 1;
Section 8; Clause 17. Denise D Davis are youare attempting to commit treason by
attempting to invoke your authority outsideof your jurisdiction as per The
Constitution for the United States of Americaat Article 3; Section 3?
Signed
They just rolled on w/their typical next letter, ignoring this issue entirely.
I used one of Cary's responses in late July and have not heard anything from
them since then.
How would you have responded to their letter? I thank you for your input. If
I did not present the issue properly you can just correct me Charley. I am
certainly not above learning a better way to express the 1817 jurisdiction
issue.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:27 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You used it with IRS? Tell me what you did too see if you follow my directions
On Nov 18, 2021, 10:16 AM -0700, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
You keep commenting like you are winning cases in "their" court constantly and
consistently. You have shown some success w/your1817 concept w/traffic tickets
but are you getting anywhere in your court in their court? I tried the 1817
w/the IRS and they just ignored it, like everything else. You could disagree
w/out being quite so insulting, but I think you are just trying to hide your
lack of real success in your court in their court.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:29 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
LMAO
That is because you think going to that court building is in their court. On
Nov 18, 2021, 9:00 AM -0700, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Well if for some reason you have to use their administrative tribunal courts as
Charley does, then you are subject to their rules. If you don't want to use
"their" courts, which only deal w/fictions, then their rules do not apply. It
is my intent to stay the hell out of their courts if at all possible.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 7:15 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rick, no disrespect but lol.
charley gets it
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021, 1:55 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do the federal rules of procedure, whether criminal or civil apply to people or
just to the vessels created by the U.S. Inc.?
The question lacks understanding of what does sovereignty mean? Or self
governance?
Article 1;8;17
Article 1;1On Nov 17, 2021, 11:58 -0700,
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, wrote:
Do the federal rules of procedure, whether criminal or civil apply to people or
just to the vessels created by the U.S. Inc.?