You can go back and listen to Cary's jurisdiction calls. The information
is there. Seems like I asked you about a change of status document and you
did not want to share unless you got $100.00. Doesn't seem quite fair to
share w/out a gift. Maybe we could exchange ideas without any requests for
$$$.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:13 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and what was carys' response.. the one you sent it would be nice..
*letter? word for word :-) Thanks.. It would be a great learning too for
us :-)
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 1:08 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This was my response to a Letter 3219 (SC/CG) dated 12-15-2020 from our
lovely friends at the IRS of course saying they wanted $$$:
The purpose of this letter is to give notice of non-acceptance and to
decline your offer of contract dated December 15, 2020, due to lack of
jurisdiction. Denise D Davis, you have thirty days (30) to prove that
you have jurisdiction to even contact us let alone try to assess a tax
against us since we are not within your territory.
You, Denise D Davis, are responsible for all the property you are
unlawfully attempting to demand through fraud if you cannot prove
jurisdiction. The Constitution for the United States of America at
Article 1; Section 8; Clause 17 limits the jurisdiction of the United
States to the ten miles square of the District and other needful buildings
and places lawfully ceded by the state legislatures.
Denise D Davis, please provide the evidence the COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE relies on to show the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is not in violation
of Article 1; Section 8; Clause 17. Denise D Davis are you are
attempting to commit treason by attempting to invoke your authority outside
of your jurisdiction as per The Constitution for the United States of
America at Article 3; Section 3?
Signed
They just rolled on w/their typical next letter, ignoring this issue
entirely. I used one of Cary's responses in late July and have not heard
anything from them since then.
How would you have responded to their letter? I thank you for your
input. If I did not present the issue properly you can just correct me
Charley. I am certainly not above learning a better way to express the
1817 jurisdiction issue.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:27 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You used it with IRS? Tell me what you did too see if you follow my
directions
On Nov 18, 2021, 10:16 AM -0700, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
You keep commenting like you are winning cases in "their" court
constantly and consistently. You have shown some success w/your1817
concept w/traffic tickets but are you getting anywhere in your court in
their court? I tried the 1817 w/the IRS and they just ignored it, like
everything else. You could disagree w/out being quite so insulting, but I
think you are just trying to hide your lack of real success in your court
in their court.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:29 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
LMAO
That is because you think going to that court building is in their
court.
On Nov 18, 2021, 9:00 AM -0700, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
Well if for some reason you have to use their administrative tribunal
courts as Charley does, then you are subject to their rules. If you don't
want to use "their" courts, which only deal w/fictions, then their rules do
not apply. It is my intent to stay the hell out of their courts if at all
possible.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 7:15 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
rick, no disrespect but lol.
charley gets it
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021, 1:55 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Do the federal rules of procedure, whether criminal or civil apply to
people or just to the vessels created by the U.S. Inc.?
The question lacks understanding of what does sovereignty mean? Or
self governance?
Article 1;8;17
Article 1;1
On Nov 17, 2021, 11:58 -0700,
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, wrote:
Do the federal rules of procedure, whether criminal or civil apply to
people or just to the vessels created by the U.S. Inc.?
