Any employee of a corporation has his job duty, responsibilities to
represent corporation in execution of corporate function, therefore the
corporate representatives are liable as well as corporations in any wrong
doing.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021, 06:06 veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
good engagement from the 2 of you. please do keep in mind what i say may
have deeper meaning then just on its face (not saying that referencing what
i just said). the state(s) have their contracts but were they all truly
done by the will of the people of which compose the state(s)? for this i
say i like how charley thinks about compacts, also we need to remember book
2 of the law of nations.
Vattel Law of Nations, Book 2 Article 132: "God has created heaven for
himself and his saints, and has given the earth to mankind, intending it
for the advantage of the poor as well as of the rich. The roads are for
their use, and God has not subjected them to any taxes." (just throwing
this part in because i like it.)
Justice KENNEDY (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: "And, first, the law ascribes to the king the attribute of
sovereignty, or pre-eminence... . Hence it is, that no suit or action can
be brought against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can
have jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of
power ...." 1 Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England pp 234-235
(1765). ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706 [alden v maine and blackstone quoted
in gamble v u.s 2019]. Justice SOUTER, Justice GINSBURG, Justice BREYER
(Supreme Court of the United States) join dissenting: Before the new
federal scheme appeared, 18th-century political theorists had assumed that
"there must reside somewhere in every political unit a single, undivided,
final power, higher in legal authority than any other power, subject to no
law, a law unto itself." B. Bailyn, The Ideological Origins of the American
Revolution 198 (1967); see also Wood 345. The American development of
divided sovereign powers, which "shatter[ed] ... the categories of
government that had dominated Western thinking for centuries," id., at 385,
was made possible only by a recognition that the ultimate sovereignty rests
in the people themselves. See id., at 530 (noting that because "none of
these arguments about 'joint jurisdictions' and 'coequal sovereignties'
convincingly refuted the Antifederalist doctrine of a supreme and
indivisible sovereignty," the Federalists could succeed only by emphasizing
that the supreme power" 'resides in the people, as the fountain of
government' "(citing 1 Pennsylvania and the Federal Constitution,
1787-1788, p. 302 (J. McMaster & F. Stone eds. 1888) (quoting James
Wilson)). SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA v. FLORIDA, 517 U.S. 44
Justice CARDOZO (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the Court: Even sovereigns may contract without derogating from their
sovereignty. Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330; 1 Oppenheim,
International Law (4th Ed.) ss 493, 494; Hall, International Law (8th Ed.)
s 107; 2 Hyde, International Law, s 489. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301
U.S. 548
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021, 10:09 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Veritas Ghost
Excellent writing but would like to throw in two cents on your last two
posts.
First is I really care less about government and its divisions. Which is
what Republic really means. A word so misused. In America the very first
division appears to be man and a goverment. Sovereignty is only in man but
man can surrender by contracts and the stars and counties do the same.
Surrender sovereignty by a contract.
Mainly because it has long been decided by the civil war that the United
States is the ultimate creator and granted that by the constitution and the
civil war. States and counties can reject but can not create law without
permission from the United States. The states and counties rejections are a
return to liberty and sovereignty as counties and States. Counties and
States surrender their sovereignty by contracts with the United States and
why they are always paid and sovereignty is surrendered.
But Ginsburg of your last paragraph again hits my speciality that man is
sovereign and has ultimate authority. Not even the supreme court can
reverse that decision, or that verdict, nor United States or any
corporation enter the court. It requires a man and men that operate
corporations will lose immunity if the corporation will not pay
restitution. The employee is the responsible party that caused injury and
will the corporation pay? The very reason the question is asked? Does the
individual or corporation intend to do harm? The individual as a free
citizen is liable until the corporation pays. The corporation grants
immunity by restitution.
The title of citizen is superior to title of President
Of course! As the constituition requires the President to surrender his
free inhabitant status. Making the the United States liable for all of the
president's actions to the people. Both as president of the United States
of America and executive president of the United States. The very reason we
petition Congress for injury and harm as they created the law and are
liable as a natural person if they do not have the corporation make
restitution.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 6:36 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
that is why i put quotes around democracy because we are a republic andLife in one word--LOVE
i have no love for a demon-cracy. a republic and democracy exist on our
land, the republic for which we stand and our political arm for foreign
affairs thats supposed to be under our reign but for most intents and
purposes is rouge. as explained in downes v bidwell but i think better
explained through justice thomas and ginsburg in their dissenting opinions
in gamble v us (2019)
gamble v u.s (2019) breif overview of objections and justice thomas[i
would read what the other dissenting judges say to, ill also include a
tiny bit of ginsburg]: When the original States declared their
independence, they claimed the powers inherent in sovereignty .... The
Constitution limited but did not abolish the sovereign powers of the
States, which retained `a residuary and inviolable sovereignty.' The
Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961). Thus, both the Federal
Government and the States wield sovereign powers, and that is why our
system of government is said to be one of `dual sovereignty.' Gregory v.
Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111 S.Ct. 2395, 115 L.Ed.2d 410] (1991)."
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn., 584 U.S. ___, ___, 138 S.Ct.
1461, 1475, 200 L.Ed.2d 854 (2018).
...But there is a difference between the whole and a single part, and
that difference underlies decisions as foundational to our legal system as
McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). There, in terms so
directly relevant as to seem presciently tailored to answer this very
objection, Chief Justice Marshall distinguished precisely between "the
people of a State" and "[t]he people of all the States," id., at 428, 435;
between the "sovereignty which the people of a single state
possess"...Stare decisis has its pedigree in the unwritten common law of
England. As Blackstone explained, the common law included "[e]stablished
customs" and "[e]stablished rules and maxims" that were discerned and
articulated by judges. 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England
68-69 (1765) (Blackstone). In the common-law system, stare decisis played
1983*1983 an important role because "judicial decisions [were] the
principal and most authoritative evidence, that [could] be given, of the
existence of such a custom as shall form a part of the common law." Id., at
69. Accordingly, "precedents and rules must be followed, unless flatly
absurd or unjust," because a judge must issue judgments "according to the
known laws and customs of the land" and not "according to his private
sentiments" or "own private judgment." Id., at 69-70. In other words,
judges were expected to adhere to precedents because they embodied the very
law the judges were bound to apply...Importantly, however, the common law
did not view precedent as unyielding when it was "most evidently contrary
to reason" or "divine law." Blackstone 69-70. The founding generation
recognized that a "judge may mistake the law." Id., at 71; see also 1 Kent
444 ("Even a series of decisions are not always conclusive evidence of what
is law"). And according to Blackstone, judges should disregard precedent
that articulates a rule incorrectly when necessary "to vindicate the old
[rule] from misrepresentation." Blackstone 70; see also 1 Kent 443 ("If ...
any solemnly adjudged case can be shown to be founded in error, it is no
doubt the right and the duty of the judges who have a similar case before
them, to correct the error"). He went further: When a "former decision is
manifestly absurd or unjust" or fails to conform to reason, it is not
simply "bad law," but "not law" at all. Blackstone 70 (emphasis). This
view—that demonstrably erroneous "blunders" of prior courts should be
corrected—was accepted by state courts throughout the 19th century. See,
e.g., McDowell v. Oyer, 21 Pa. 417, 423 (1853); Guild v. Eager, 17 Mass.
615, 622 (1822).
Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system established by the Federal
Constitution, however, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in the governed.
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n, 576
U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v.
Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at
26-30. Insofar as a crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign,
Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382, 43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the
"original fountain of all legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at
152 (A. Hamilton); see Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal
Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538,
1542 (1967).
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021, 8:05 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
per one of your videos below "Laws that destroy democracy" i have not
seen it but if im thinking correctly about that title, good DESTROY IT.
We never wanted it anyway.
DEMOCRACY: Government by the people; a form of government, in which the
supreme powers are lodged in the hands of the people collectively, or in
which the
people exercise the power of legislation. Such was the government of
Athens.
REPUBLIC: 1. A commonwealth; a state in which the exercise of the
sovereign power is lodged in representatives elected by the people. In
modern usage, it differs from a democracy or democratic state, in which the
people exercise the powers of sovereignty in person. Yet the democracies of
Greece are often called REPUBLICS. 2.
Common interest; the public. Republic of letters, the collective body
of learned men.
*Today, there are two systems of law operating in America,*
*1) The Republic, which is the law of land.*
*2) Democracy or colorable law, which looks/acts like law.*
*The Republic:*
*Article 4, Sec. 4 of the Constitution states "the United States shall
guarantee to every state in this union a Republican form of government, and
shall protect each of them against invasion and against domestic violence."
etc. As early as 1782, Jefferson said that it was ridiculous to suppose
that a man should surrender himself to the state, this would be slavery.*
*That’s why the Republic, with its checks/balances, provided for
authority through the election by the people of public officials best
fitted to represent them. The attitude towards property respects the laws
and individuals’ rights through sensible economic procedure that does not
create irresponsible debt and prevents foreign domination.*
*Democracy**:*
*The 1928 US Government Training Manual, No.2000-25, War Department
Chief of Staff states: "A government of the masses. Authority derived
through mass meeting or any form of direct expression, results in
mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic negating property
rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall
regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion,
prejudice, impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in
demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy."*
*Also, a democracy has no system of Constitutional natural rights to
protect the individual from the absolute will of any voting majority, which
is a small segment of the population, and they regulate laws which, without
limiting laws, creates endless colorable rules and regulations in an effort
to please everyone until the system is under complete government control. A
democracy may grant civil rights, but in a Republic, you automatically have
natural civil rights.*
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 8:56 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
JAB PASSPORT Shares Personal Data With AMAZON and MICROSOFT (10:47)--
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UFli30i7nlE
Project Veritas: Senior Advisor Reveals NJ Governor Murphy to Impose
State-Wide Covid Vaccine Mandate AFTER Re-Election (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/breaking-project-veritas-senior-advisor-reveals-nj-governor-murphy-impose-state-wide-covid-vaccine-mandate-re-election-video/
New laws that destroy "democracy" (58 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/new-laws-that-destroy-democracy:d
MAN LAYS DYING IN FRONT OF HOSPITAL THAT REFUSES TO OPEN THE DOOR
(5:13)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SycWNOSpEqEv/
DOCTORS DENY LIFESAVING LUNG TRANSPLANT SURGERY OVER COVID VACCINATION
STATUS (using for the title. 18:15)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1wpl139ktN8/
Scottish NHS Trust Cancels Face To Face GP Appointments To Keep Roads
Clear For COP26 Leaders (5:20)
https://odysee.com/@WEGOTAPROBLEM:f/scottish-nhs-trust-cancels-face-to-face:3
Boris Johnson suggests “We could feed some of the human beings to the
animals (1:29)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zHO14MElkWI
Now they’re gluing their hands to the road (58 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/now-they%E2%80%99re-gluing-their-hands-to-the:c
Compulsory jabs for NHS staff (59 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/compulsory-jabs-for-nhs-staff:e
300,000 face no jab, no job (55 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/300,000-face-no-jab,-no-job:5
Minnesota Surgeon Fired After Speaking Against Mask Mandates at School
Board Meeting
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/minnesota-surgeon-fired-speaking-mask-mandates-school-board-meeting/
ADL Publishes Ridiculous Halloween Costume Guide Urging Parents to
Avoid ‘Costumes That Perpetuate Gender Norms’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/adl-publishes-ridiculous-halloween-costume-guide-urging-parents-avoid-costumes-perpetuate-gender-norms/
The Devil's Halloween Child Sacrifice Aimed at 5-11 Y/O (12:22)
https://rumble.com/vo80dl-arrest-fauci-the-devils-halloween-child-sacrifice-aimed-at-5-11-yo.html
QUEBEC WANTS TO FIRE UNVAXXED HEALTH CARE STAFF, REPLACE THEM WITH
NOVICES: ALEXA LAVOIE (7:21)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ca4mEHOBuRw/
McAuliffe Supporters Are Posting Signs Promising to “Keep Parents Out
of Classrooms” as Campaign Winds Down
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/pure-marxism-mcauliffe-supporters-posting-signs-promising-keep-parents-classrooms-campaign-winds/
Exclusion Zones Around Schools (8:55)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=8WkLCLfqJNg
“Completely Reckless” – Louisiana High School Under Investigation For
Vaccinating Teenage Students Without Parental Consent (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/completely-reckless-louisiana-high-school-investigation-vaccinating-teenage-students-without-parental-consent-video/
SASKATCHEWAN SETS UP COVID SNITCH LINE, DETAINMENT CENTRES AND
ENFORCEMENT TEAM (7:52)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zRFvLQXCRUU/
CCP PARTY MEMEBERS DISCUSS VAXX IMPACT ON US MILITARY SAYING THAT
EVERYONE VAXXED WILL DIE (58 sec)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qg7DGd9XffZA/
JUDGE ADDS OPINIONS, NOT FACTS, IN PASTOR ARTUR SENTENCING (8:37)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Eb2sIAQ-wZI/
3 JUDGES SUDDENLY DEAD AFTER JAB MANDATE (43 sec)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GqGJpxJJnQAF/
3 BRAIN SURGERIES, 5 SEIZURES AND A STROKE AFTER 1ST JAB. VOWS TO GET
THE SECOND ONE. DARWIN AWARD? (3:39)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NMWUSLSPXkmO/
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg Ignores Supply Chain Crisis To
Focus On Tucker Carlson
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/transportation-secretary-pete-buttigieg-ignores-supply-chain-crisis-focus-tucker-carlson/
Biden’s Treasury Nominee to Regulate US Banking Is Open Marxist Who
Joined Facebook Marxist Analysis Page in 2019
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/bidens-treasury-nominee-regulate-us-banking-open-marxist-joined-facebook-marxist-analysis-page-2019/
“Tell Biden We Are Coming” – Massive Illegal Caravan Continues to
March Through Mexico En Route to Open US Border – Now 20 Miles North of
Tapachula (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/tell-biden-coming-massive-illegal-caravan-continues-march-mexico-en-route-open-us-border-now-20-miles-north-tapachula-video/
Biden Gang Now Pushing for ‘Billionaire’s Tax’ Which In Reality Will
Likely Soon Tax Americans’ 401Ks and IRAs
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/biden-gang-now-pushing-billionaires-tax-reality-will-likely-soon-tax-americans-401ks-iras/
Vernon Jones EXPOSED: Rape, Death Threats, Cover-Ups, Criminal
Corruption (16:58)
https://rumble.com/vo7t3p-vernon-jones-exposed-rape-death-threats-cover-ups-criminal-corruption.html
Thousands of NYC Municipal Workers March Across Brooklyn Bridge
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/massive-protest-biden-mandates-thousands-filmed-crossing-brooklyn-bridge-shocking-elites/
FAUCI CULT MEMBER RUNS CAR INTO CROWD PROTESTING INJECTION MANDATES
(6:45)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/x91Gu9SakMvL/
