HE'S A HELICOPTER (20 sec)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=fouo3sS01J8
POPE ISSUES APOCALYPTIC WARNING FOR MANKIND (11:52)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=xJiPQ3s140A
UK Govt To Decode DNA Of 100,000 Newborn BABIES (1:48)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wdKe_Xb59y0
REMOVING THE Y CHROMOSONE IS REMOVING JESUS. (pub law 92-500. 8:25)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rufXmIxX99Xf/
"There's Going to be a Shortage of Beef, And Prices Are Probably Going to
Go Up" - USDA Warning (3:41)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=EmGf6ggEPTM
Dr. Modry on self-determination in governance and Alberta's future (2:50)
https://rumble.com/v20h1zy-dr.-modry-on-self-determination-in-governance-and-albertas-future-rebelnews.html
Biden Regime Ramps Up Their Kinetic War Against Russia – Will Send Patriot
Missile Systems to Ukraine
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/biden-regime-ramps-kinetic-war-russia-will-send-patriot-missile-systems-ukraine/
(*crypto hulk voice* ccchhhiiinnnaaa)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=SCaGG2R0I6s
Corrupt Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger Wants to Destroy Georgia
Elections Forever with Ranked Choice Voting
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/corrupt-georgia-secretary-state-raffensperger-wants-destroy-georgia-elections-forever-ranked-choice-voting/
Leaked Documents Indicate over 300 Members of Oath Keepers May Be Current
or Former DHS Employees – Not Clear How Many Are Federal Operatives
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/feds-shadows-leaked-documents-indicate-300-members-oath-keepers-may-current-former-dhs-employees-not-clear-many-federal-operatives/
Several “Imposters” Identified After They were Caught on Camera Conducting
Acts of Terror Dressed as Bolsonaro Supporters
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/false-flag-fedsurrection-brazil-imposters-conducting-acts-terror-dressed-bolsonaro-supporters/
Famed DJ and Executive Producer on Ellen DeGeneres’ Talk Show Dead at 40 by
Suicide
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/famed-dj-executive-producer-ellen-degeneres-talk-show-dead-40-suicide/
Skate Canada Changes Definition of “Team” to Allow Any 2 Skaters to Compete
Together in the Name of “Gender Diversity”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/skate-canada-changes-definition-team-allow-2-skaters-compete-together-name-gender-diversity/
AFL Lawsuit Exposes Twitter’s “Partner Support Portal” Used by Elites to
Eliminate Any Info Challenging Fauci-Approved COVID Narrative
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/afl-lawsuit-exposes-twitters-partner-support-portal-used-elites-eliminate-info-challenging-fauci-approved-covid-narrative-just-dr-shiva-reported-back-2021/
Andrew Bridgen Calls Out Uk Institutions For Covering Up Jab Harms (42 sec)
https://odysee.com/@WEGOTAPROBLEM:f/andrew-bridgen-calls-out-uk-institutions:2
Fetal DEATHS SURGE Canadian Data Shows HUGE Fetal Death Increase In Vaxxed
Mothers (13:56)
https://rumble.com/v20iaw2-tragedy-fetal-deaths-surge-canadian-data-shows-huge-fetal-death-increase-in.html
Justice Minister, David Lametti pumps the gas - not the brakes, on medical
assistance in dying (3:40)
https://rumble.com/v20hava-justice-minister-david-lametti-pumps-the-gas-not-the-breaks-on-medical-assi.html
This can’t be real (2:35)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/this-can%E2%80%99t-be-real-2:a
THE REAL POWER OF THE PEOPLE (The doctrines thus delivered we call the
revealed or devine law, and they are to be found only in the holy
scriptures. These precepts, when revealed, are found upon comparison to be
really a part of the original law of nature, as they tend in all their
consequences to man's felicity...this law of nature, being coeval with man
kind and dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to
any other. It is binding over all the globe and in all countries, and at
all times: no human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this.."
blackstone's commentaries on the laws of england (1765-1769), section 2,
page 41.
11 Am Jur § 3 fn1: What is a Constitution? It is the form of government,
delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first
principles of fundamental laws are established. Vanhorne v. Dorrance. The
Constitution is the fundamental law of the state, in opposition to which
any other law or any direction or order must be inoperative and void.
Asplund v. Hannett.
Justice SOUTER, STEVENS, GINSBURG, and BREYER (Supreme Court of the United
States) join, dissenting:..The principle is, that all human law must be
prescribed by a superior.. The sovereign, when traced to his source, must
be found in the man." Id., at 458. 1 Blackstone Commentaries. pp 241, 242.
ALDEN v. MAINE, 527 U.S. 706
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. concurring (Supreme Court of Wisconsin): *921
¶68 The people of Wisconsin pronounced liberty to be of primary importance,
establishing government principally to protect their freedom. "The
Wisconsin Constitution begins with a Declaration of Rights, echoing
language from our nation's Declaration of Independence, recognizing that
the proper role of government—the very reason governments are instituted—is
to secure our inherent rights, including liberty:
All people are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent
rights; among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; to
secure these rights, governments are instituted, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed.
Wis. Const. art. I, § 1 (emphasis added). `Too much dignity cannot well be
given to that declaration.' An inherent right to liberty means all people
are born with it; the government does not bestow it upon us and it may not
infringe it." Porter v. State, 2018 WI 79, ¶52, 382 Wis. 2d 697, 913 N.W.2d
842 (Rebecca Grassl Bradley, J. and Daniel Kelly, J., dissenting) (emphasis
added; internal citation omitted). Under the Wisconsin Constitution,
government officials, whether elected or appointed, are servants of the
citizens, not their masters..¶77 This court is well aware that many
Wisconsin citizens support the Safer at Home Order while many oppose it.
This court does not base its decisions on popular opinion; it grounds them
in the law. It is for the political branches, not the judiciary, to respond
to the public's wishes, and for this court to declare whether each branch
acts within its constitutional grant of power and in accord with statutory
law.[14] "Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase
granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power
granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave
emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its
limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of
emergency, and they are not altered by emergency." Home Bldg. & Loan Ass'n
v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 425, 54 S.Ct. 231, 78 L.Ed. 413 (1934) *927
(emphasis added). In a republic in which the constitution demarcates the
powers assigned to each branch of government, it is of foundational
importance which government official presumes the power to control the
people. Particularly in an emergency, this court may not cast aside the
constitution nor disregard statutory law. Wisconsin Legislature v. Palm,
942 NW 2d 900
Justice Brown (Supreme Court of the U.S.) announced the judgment of the
court: Notwithstanding its duty to 'guarantee to every state in this Union
a republican form of government' (art. 4, ß 4), by which we understand,
according to the definition of Webster, 'a government in which the supreme
power resides in the whole body of the people, and is exercised by
representatives elected by them, Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S....244
A right is considered fundamental if it is "the basis of all free
government." Downes, 182 U.S. at 290-91, 21 S.Ct. 770 (White, J.,
concurring). Fitisemanu v. United States, 1 F. 4th 862, 873
COX, Chief Justice (Supreme Court of Indiana): A "Constitution" is
legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign capacity,
while a "statute" is legislation from their representatives, subject to
limitations prescribed by the superior authority. People v. May, 3 Mich.
598..The Legislature, acting outside of the Constitution, is without
jurisdiction and its action null." ELLINGHAM v. DYE et al, 178 Ind. 336
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In our constitutional republic, Justice Brandeis
observed, the title of citizen is superior to the title of President. tuaua
v us (2015)
DENT, P. (Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia): The word "state" is
generally used to denote three different things, and often without
discrimination: First, the territory within its jurisdiction; second, the
government or governmental agencies appointed to carry out the will of the
people; and, third, the people in their sovereign capacity. The state is
not the sovereign in this country. The people who make it are sovereign,
and all its officers are but their servants. RALSTON v. TOWN OF WESTON,
46 W.Va. 544
Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system established by the Federal
Constitution, however, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in the "governed"
[should say the people not the governed]. Arizona State Legislature v.
Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n, 576 U.S. _, _, 135 S.Ct. 2652,
2675, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304,
324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at 26-30. Insofar as a crime
offends the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign, Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382, 43
S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the "original fountain of all
legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at 152 (A. Hamilton); see
Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal Governments: Another *1991
Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538, 1542 (1967) gamble v us
(2019)
42 usc 659(i)(4) Private person The term "private person" means a person
who does not have sovereign or other special immunity or privilege which
causes the person not to be subject to legal process [ie all of the people
are sovereign singularly not just collectively]
A sovereign is exempt from suit not because of any formal conception or
obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be
no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the
right depends, and as this doctrine is not confined to full sovereign
powers, it extends to those, such as the territories of the United States,
which in actual administration originate and change the law of contract and
property. Kawananokoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349 (1907)..City of College
Park v. Clayton County, 830 SE 2d 179 (June 24, 2019)
alden v maine Held: The Court of Appeals erred in denying the attorney
general's motion to intervene. Pp. 1008-1014..Indeed, it is the attorney
general who is deemed Kentucky's "chief law officer" with the authority to
represent the Commonwealth "in all cases." Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§
15.020(1), (3). Cameron v. EMW Women's Surgical Center, PSC, 142 S.Ct. 1002
(March 3, 2022)
Private Attorney General
A private citizen who commences a lawsuit to enforce a legal [or lawful]
right that benefits the community as a whole [with the power of the
attorney general. CARDINALE, v. KEANE, CARDINALE, v. JONES et al. Nos.
A21A1718, A21A1719 [[February 15, 2022]].
West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale
Group, Inc.
PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
According to the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 Stat. 27, enacted April 9,
1866, (and sometimes referred to as The Private Attorney General Act), 39th
Congress, Session 1, Ch 31 (1866), CHAP. XXXL, (Formally titled): An Act to
“Protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and
Furnish the Means of their Vindication,” April 9, 1866; Public Law 104-317,
Oct 19, 1996, 110 Stat 3853; 93 stat 1284; Public Law 96-170, 96th
Congress, Dec 9th 1979.4: “Private attorney general is an informal term
usually used today in the United States to refer to a private party who
brings a lawsuit considered to be in the public interest, i.e., benefiting
the general public and not just the plaintiff. The person considered
“private attorney general” is entitled to recover attorney’s fees if he or
she prevails. The rationale behind this principle is to provide extra
incentive to private citizens to pursue suits that may be of benefit to
society at large.”..The plaintiff holds the position as a private Attorney
General, under the 1866 Vindication and Civil Rights of the 39th Congress.
This Congressional Act gives the Plaintiff the authority to step in, when
the states fail or the government fails to uphold and protect the rights of
the citizens. It allows the plaintiff to act as a prosecutor, and enable
him to bring charges on those who hold public office and hold them
accountable for their misdeeds and misconduct, in breach of their trustee
duties as fiduciaries; as is written in the Lieber Code, Under General
Orders No. 100. This includes insurrection and rebellion, and misuses of
their/that public office in order to abuse and to incite riot among the
peaceful inhabitants, as well as endanger the lives and health of United
States Citizens. Coralyn Hill vs. The State of Arizona
JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, concurring in the Court's opinion except as to Part
VII:...It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from
falling into error; it is the function of the *443 citizen to keep the
Government from falling into error. American Communications Assn. v. Douds,
339 U.S. 382 (May 8, 1950)...COMBS, C.J., CONCUR:..The People are, after
all, the parent of this government, not its child, and it is "the function
of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error,"[33]
OKLAHOMA INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM v. Potts, 414 P. 3d 351
protected persons may in no circumstances renounce in full or in part or in
entirety the rights secured to them by the present convention"' article 8,
geneva convention relative to the treatment of civilians in the time of war
of 1949
protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances to respect for their
persons their honor their family rights their religious convictions and
practices and their manners and customs...all protected persons shall be
treated with the same consideration by the party to the conflict in whose
power they are, without any adverse distinction based in particular on race
religion or political opinion. article 33, geneva convention relative to
the protection of civilians in the time of war 1949.
no moral or physical coercion shall be exercised against protected persons,
in particular to obtain in from them or from third parties. article 31
geneva convention relative to the protections of civilians during the time
of war 1949.
frcp rule 17(a)(2) or r 17(a)(1)(G), 18 usc ch 216
41:28)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Roz81WG4h88
NEPIS 31 October 21 Who are We the People (3:36:17)
https://rumble.com/v1ikma2-nepis-31-october-21-who-are-we-the-people.html
Proposed class action against Dr. Henry’s COVID emergency in B.C. begins
certification hearing ( Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa.
1973): Judge Reynolds permitted the discovery. He found that the argument
for confidentiality was outweighed by two policies favoring disclosure.
First was ‘ the broad federal mandate for discovery in all civil actions,’
that is, the federal policy of liberal pretrial discovery as a basis
principle of the modern federal procedural scheme. The second reason
inheres in the civil rights laws themselves: [I]t is the manner of
enforcement which gives § 1983 its unique importance, for enforcement is
placed in the hands of the people. Each citizen ‘ acts as a private
attorney general who ‘ takes on the mantel of the sovereign,’ ' guarding
for all of us the individual liberties enunciated in the Constitution.
Section 1983 represents a balancing feature in our governmental structure
whereby individual citizens are encouraged to police those who are charged
with policing us all. Thus, it is of special import that suits brought
under this statute be resolved by a determination of the truth rather than
by a determination that the truth shall remain hidden.
The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to
turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to
eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483
U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of]
encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The
provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected
benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner
the better. Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549
Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India, 434 U.S. 308
12:37)
https://rumble.com/v20igas-proposed-class-action-against-dr.-henrys-covid-emergency-in-b.c.-begins-cer.html
Bipartisan Group of Lawmakers Move to Ban TikTok in the US
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/bipartisan-group-lawmakers-move-ban-tiktok-us/
How It feels to Drive a FORD F250
https://youtube.com/shorts/0wJ0uffrD9k
Why Asians Aren't Sigma Males
https://youtube.com/shorts/pqefL2Mduj0
When the Gas Fumes hit (1:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=x0N1dk0cbkM
