How Sacred Geometry is embedded in Your DNA - Secrets of Geometric Art
*https://youtu.be/Mynr7uik5-0 ;<https://youtu.be/Mynr7uik5-0>*
Attachments area
Preview YouTube video How Sacred Geometry is embedded in Your DNA - Secrets
of Geometric Art
How Sacred Geometry is embedded in Your DNA - Secrets of Geometric Art
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mynr7uik5-0&authuser=0>
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 6:15 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
National? Call them what one wish but article 6 is clear that if one does
not claim their status as a living man, they are in the government's
fiction for sure.
Once in the fiction it is a battle to be resuscitated to life. Where the
simplest fiction matter can turn to a nightmare. A fight for life.
On Dec 10, 2021, 5:55 AM -0700, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
ill slightly pull back here as some of my frustration in what i said was
from having to repeat myself to multiple people before responding. im not
sure where it points out we the people are nationals, but your definitely
not free of the constitution which binds government not the people, by
being born on the union you were crowned by the constitution no way around
it. what you rely on comes from the original constitution and articles of
confederation. a birth certificate is evidence of the creation of a
fiction, it has nothing to do with the living man except that your title
holder of it. we are all created equal, theres no if and that is not left
undefined or mystery, our laws are governed by the bible and if their not
in conformity with it its not law at all.
i agree keeping an open mind helps one expand, and i havent called you any
names so slightly confused by that comment, but i will say i havent posted
any opinions i have posted publically verifiable facts. not only that i
have posted the history of the sovereignty devolving from the king onto the
people that are now state citizens since the revolutionary war up until
2019 where we are still called "the ultimate sovereign, the fountain of all
legitimate authority". i have also talked about blue ribbon and grand
juries, i have talked about making multiple different claims and complaints
against them, so im not really sure who that question/comment is for.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 9:12 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do not use court cases but find it intresting read to guide one to
truth. I see it more as milk then meat to eat. That requires debate on what
is lawful.
The goverment definition by codes makes it clear that I'm a national.
Definition of national is one with allegience to the state. It also states
a birth certificate is proof of that. The truth is the organic law
documents are my defense and it calls me a free citizen who may be a
fugitive from codes, or an inhabitant, so journer. Probably a rebel or an
even an enemy of the United States. Depending how one defines it.
What I do know is I'm not in there jurisdicton by constitution contract.
I know my agreement with the people that we are all free citizens,
inhabitants and most likely fugitives if we dealt with governments. I've
got a creator, and a creators conscience.
I know we are all created equal and that is meat to chew to grasp the
whole truth of what is equal? Seldom does a scale balance.
I do not care if Glenn, Veritas, a supreme court judge or charley: they
all are just opinions that need absorbed into one's life to use
beneficially. That is to make the concept into a workable solution. One may
say, knowledge to wisdom. Without it, one struggles.
Call me anything you want. Just make sure that when I file my paper with
the clerk that they knows I'm supreme in my common law court. That
jurisdicton allows me to make the rules. If you do not like them. File a
claim of injury or get a jury to disagree with me. If you do not know how?
You may get treated badly.
Thomas Jefferson: to expect liberty and be ignorant; is something that
never was or will be. (Paraphrased)
On Dec 9, 2021, 6:55 AM -0700, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
speaking of quo warranto..
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Relator_(law)
Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973): Judge Reynolds
permitted the discovery. He found that the argument for confidentiality was
outweighed by two policies favoring disclosure. First was ‘ the broad
federal mandate for discovery in all civil actions,’ that is, the federal
policy of liberal pretrial discovery as a basis principle of the modern
federal procedural scheme. The second reason inheres in the civil rights
laws themselves:
[I]t is the manner of enforcement which gives § 1983 its unique
importance, for enforcement is placed in the hands of the people. Each
citizen ‘ acts as a private attorney general who ‘ takes on the mantel of
the sovereign,’ ' guarding for all of us the individual liberties
enunciated in the Constitution. Section 1983 represents a balancing feature
in our governmental structure whereby individual citizens are encouraged to
police those who are charged with policing us all. Thus, it is of special
import that suits brought under this statute be resolved by a determination
of the truth rather than by a determination that the truth shall remain
hidden.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 7:52 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
theres a difference between a free state citizen and us citizen. if you
dont believe so i find it curious that youre here considering its the main
thing glenn teaches, and i have proven.
Justice CAMPBELL (Supreme Court of the United States) dissenting:
Individuals are not the creatures of the State, but constitute it. They
come into society with rights, which cannot be invaded without injustice.
DODGE v. WOOLSEY, 59 U.S. 331
gamble v u.s (2019) breif overview of objections, thomas, ginsburg: When
the original States declared their independence, they claimed the powers
inherent in sovereignty .... The Constitution limited but did not abolish
the sovereign powers of the States, which retained `a residuary and
inviolable sovereignty.' The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed.
1961). Thus, both the Federal Government and the States wield sovereign
powers, and that is why our system of government is said to be one of `dual
sovereignty.' Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111 S.Ct. 2395, 115
L.Ed.2d 410] (1991)." Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn., 584
U.S. ___, ___, 138 S.Ct. 1461, 1475, 200 L.Ed.2d 854 (2018). ...But there
is a difference between the whole and a single part, and that difference
underlies decisions as foundational to our legal system as McCulloch v.
Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). There, in terms so directly
relevant as to seem presciently tailored to answer this very objection,
Chief Justice Marshall distinguished precisely between "the people of a
State" and "[t]he people of all the States," id., at 428, 435; between the
"sovereignty which the people of a single state possess"...Stare decisis
has its pedigree in the unwritten common law of England. As Blackstone
explained, the common law included "[e]stablished customs" and
"[e]stablished rules and maxims" that were discerned and articulated by
judges. 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 68-69 (1765)
(Blackstone). In the common-law system, stare decisis played 1983*1983 an
important role because "judicial decisions [were] the principal and most
authoritative evidence, that [could] be given, of the existence of such a
custom as shall form a part of the common law." Id., at 69. Accordingly,
"precedents and rules must be followed, unless flatly absurd or unjust,"
because a judge must issue judgments "according to the known laws and
customs of the land" and not "according to hisprivate sentiments" or "own
private judgment." Id., at 69-70. In other words, judges were expected to
adhere to precedents because they embodied the very law the judges were
bound to apply...Importantly, however, the common law did not view
precedent as unyielding when it was "most evidently contrary to reason" or
"divine law." Blackstone 69-70. The founding generation recognized that a
"judge may mistake the law." Id., at 71; see also 1 Kent 444 ("Even a
series of decisions are not always conclusive evidence of what is law").
And according to Blackstone, judges should disregard precedent that
articulates a rule incorrectly when necessary "to vindicate the old [rule]
from misrepresentation." Blackstone 70; see also 1 Kent 443 ("If ... any
solemnly adjudged case can be shown to be founded in error, it is no doubt
the right and the duty of the judges who have a similar case before them,
to correct the error"). He went further: When a "former decision is
manifestly absurd or unjust" or fails to conform to reason, it is not
simply "bad law," but "not law" at all. Blackstone 70 (emphasis). This
view—that demonstrably erroneous "blunders" of prior courts should be
corrected—was accepted by state courts throughout the 19th century. See,
e.g., McDowell v. Oyer, 21 Pa. 417, 423 (1853); Guild v. Eager, 17 Mass.
615, 622 (1822).
Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system established by the Federal
Constitution, however, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in the governed.
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n, 576
U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v.
Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at
26-30. Insofar as a crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign,
Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382, 43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the
"original fountain of all legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at
152 (A. Hamilton); see Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal
Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538,
1542 (1967).
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 10:45 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From veritas reading
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In our constitutional republic, Justice Brandeis
observed, the title of citizen is superior to the title of President. Thus,
the questions "[w]ho is the citizen[?]" and "what is the meaning of the
term?" Aristotle, Politics bk. 3, reprinted in part in READINGS IN
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 55, 61 (Francis W. Coker ed., 1938), are no less than
the questions of "who constitutes the sovereign state?" and "what is the
meaning of statehood as an association?"
Who is the citizen? I view myself in the Republic more a free citizen
then a state citizen associated to a society and worst called goverment who
has its own desires and often contrary to mind.
I'm in society as a contributor of goods others want and I profit and
so do they. I'm not much for public schools, or creating a public funded
gym but rather let one citizen create as ones passion and vision a need for
others. Not a few leaders of a community wanting my money to create it. I
believe in home school, and not public school. Because my children needed
far more freedom then a public school could offer. They needed more time to
explore their ambitions and curiosity. Travel with me today.
I do not like state citizenship on the local level at all. I support
citizenship to protect the country. I'll fight for it.
So yes, to protect myself I require a trial by jury and live my life As
friendly member of society. Not knowing when a trial by jury may judge me.
Not an attorney or a judge representing a corporation. I try to use
arbitration to settle affairs and encourage my business associates to allow
the panel make the final verdict then a court. Many avoid this thinking an
attorney will grant them something magical.
In the Republic our forefathers gave us the choice to be more free but
it is riskier then living by regulations created by society government that
are written on tablet. I chose to be a free citizen and not a state
citizen. I chose a trial by jury and not jury trial. Arbitration over a
court when possible. It's an enlienable right to do this. Most people
prefer to be a state citizen.
Quo habeas corpus comes often as I require the court of a free citizen.
Quo warranto follows with the question, by what authority? Your not taking
my inelienable rights away or my friends rights. Every state district court
honors it when one is in jail. Other states the appellate or state supreme
court. The jailer is required to answer; by what authority do you hold me.
The jailer is required to submit it to the court. The courts charging one
has to answer to the same and one could or can use it on a simple traffic
ticket if they want to.
Simple traffic ticket. I prefer as all know to send the prosecutors
court that he does not have jurisdiction in a simple statement. That is
telling the prosecutor your reply to arraignment and one is not required to
go as yippy answered. The Prosecutor either drops the case or schedules an
trial For you to appear. He should notify you that he has stilled the trial
and date. Some do not. When one misses he again has a choice. To motion for
your arrest or dismiss the case. Your choice when you will call for
prosecutor and his Corp to appear. I prefer they arrest me but others may
say I'll do it right after given a ticket by officer.
Whenever one will eventually open and start their common law court.
Your paperOr document that I'll not discuss will establish your court. So
when filed with the court clerk you get an extra copy and a court date
thirty days or. Send to the prosecutor and he most likely will not respond
or show. Go to court on date allot and deflate default judgement. Or pick
your jury and convict. Your choice.
I'll be a free citizen.
On Dec 8, 2021, 6:29 AM -0700, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
COURT HALTS VACCINE REQUIREMENT FOR FED CONTRACTORS (peggy, if you
havent seen my last fires of freedom special edition, i think youll enjoy
18 usc 245, and just in case us For A constitution art 4 sec 4 and 2.
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In our constitutional republic, Justice Brandeis
observed, the title of citizen is superior to the title of President. Thus,
the questions "[w]ho is the citizen[?]" and "what is the meaning of the
term?" Aristotle, Politics bk. 3, reprinted in part in READINGS IN
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 55, 61 (Francis W. Coker ed., 1938), are no less than
the questions of "who constitutes the sovereign state?" and "what is the
meaning of statehood as an association?" tuaua v us (2015)
Justice CAMPBELL (Supreme Court of the United States) dissenting:
Individuals are not the creatures of the State, but constitute it. They
come into society with rights, which cannot be invaded without injustice.
DODGE v. WOOLSEY, 59 U.S. 331
Vattel Law of Nations, Book 2 Article 132: "God has created heaven for
himself and his saints, and has given the earth to mankind, intending it
for the advantage of the poor as well as of the rich. The roads are for
their use, and God has not subjected them to any taxes." 39:13)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=u7FdLQ5H0e0
Radioactive Water From Pilgrim Nuclear Plant To Be Released Into Cape
Cod Bay (slosh more pigs. if youre reading this its to late. 2:09)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jbsWAJhq36I
No Jab, No Food: Canadian Province Imposes New Regulations to Ban
Unvaccinated from Grocery Stores
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/no-jab-no-food-canadian-province-imposes-new-regulations-ban-unvaccinated-grocery-stores/
House Democrats + RINO Kinzinger Pass Bill That Would Allow Debt
Ceiling Hike with Simple Majority in the Senate
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/developing-house-democrats-rino-kinzinger-pass-bill-allow-debt-ceiling-hike-simple-majority-senate/
Pacific Eclipse – A tabletop exercise on smallpox pandemic response
(4:51)
https://odysee.com/@ChadChaddington:d/Pacific-Eclipse-A-Smallpox-Pandemic-Tabletop-Exercise-(Share-This!):d
Son Vaccinated in Exchange for Pizza without Parental Consent (2:55)
https://odysee.com/@Adverse:c/vaccinemandate:4
At Least 3 Children Die and 120 Hospitalized in Vietnam After Receiving
Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine – 4 Adults Die from Vero Cell Covid Vaccine
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/least-3-children-die-120-hospitalized-vietnam-receiving-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-4-adults-die-vero-cell-covid-vaccine/
Rockwood School District Admits to Calling the FBI on Parents …UPDATED:
With Response from Rockwood School District
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/rockwood-school-district-admits-calling-fbi-parents/
Darpa [has for a long time been] Creating Super Humans [you people
thought captain america was just a game and fictional character?]: Former
Gov't Employee Predicts Cataclysmic Extinction Level Event (8:39)
https://rumble.com/vqdjzo-darpa-creating-super-humans-former-govt-employee-predicts-cataclysmic-extin.html
It’s not up to us (41 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/it%E2%80%99s-not-up-to-us:c
CHECKPOINTS if you want to leave (58 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/checkpoints-if-you-want-to-leave:e
Dr Shillary Jones & Lorraine Shamelessly Lie About Unjabbed
Hospitalisation Figures (5:24)
https://odysee.com/@WEGOTAPROBLEM:f/dr-shillary-jones-lorraine-shamelessly:c
VAERS show HOT LOTS Within Lots (29:33)
https://odysee.com/@Welcometheeagle88:4/VAERS-show-HOT-LOTS-Within-Lots!:1
JAIL for sneezing (47 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/jail-for-sneezing:b
THE USA FOR THE FINAL CARD? OR JUST A REALLY DARK WINTER. (5:49)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/khYlbY5bXEqY/
WHY DID THEY CHANGE THE TORONTO CHRISTMAS MARKET TO THE DISTILLERY
WINTER VILLAGE? (12:37)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3wCLKch7h1k/
Leaked Video Shows Boris Johnson’s Spox Laughing About Christmas Party
That Took Place Amid Covid Lockdown
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/watch-leaked-video-shows-boris-johnsons-spox-laughing-christmas-party-took-place-amid-covid-lockdown/
Office clean (24 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/office-clean-%F0%9F%87%A8%F0%9F%87%B3:9
Elon Musk Warns That ‘Civilization Is Going to Crumble (2:33)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wN-IgeCx-AY
Elon Musk – Calls for Congress to Throw Out Biden’s ‘Build Back Better
Bill’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/richest-man-world-elon-musk-calls-congress-throw-bidens-build-back-better-bill-dont-pass/
SATANIC CULT MEMBERS WHO ARE PLANNING THE SACRIFICE OF CHILDREN (2:48)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Nqg5N6tUr2Xg/
BLOOD SACRIFICE AGENDA. BE THE RESISTANCE (6:52)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Bagz1AsUNEvf/
Comrade Down: Saule Omarova Withdraws Nomination for Comptroller of the
Currency
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/breaking-comrade-saule-omarova-withdraws-nomination-comptroller-currency/
Sam White won Appeal Case in UK High Court - video-statement (1:31)
https://odysee.com/@OzFlor:7/S67:2
RABBI IS NOT AFRAID ON THE EVIL PSYCHOPATHS IN GOVERNMENT HE IS AFRAID
OF STUPID PEOPLE (im not afraid of either but i feel his sentiment. 59 sec)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WXEsDyxmkUwB/
You Can’t Say That On Tv (3:44)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nY2KiNQtCTM
CDC - Why Critical Thinking Is Dangerous (8:13)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=TNaT5A-1gHc
