If your going to their court. Not advised.
Make a court looking document. After all the petitioner and respondant and
addresses. Then put in center WRT and below that Quo warranto. Under it write
article 1; section 8; clause 17 and state that the United States or the state
of ? does not have jurisdiction in this matter. If one wants they can use Quo
mandamus under that which means order. Tell them to vacate or whatever you
desire that is reasonable for the court to do. Take to the court clerk and
stamp it. The issue is over at that point. Now if you insist going to court
keep your mouth shut because the so called judge will not admit to what you say
in court. Oh, you might get one in five hundred. It's in the paperwork your
honor. If he did not see it yet, give him a extra copy that was stamped. Not to
the attorney. Your doing administrative work at this point and it is you and
judge only. Just another reason to not go to the court.
If you really understand this concept feel free to talk to the black robe. The
judge most often will not do anything in front of attorneys and why. Your
battle is with the prosecutor and not the judge. Even if the judge presents the
question.
Again, the court is really the paper and not the gallery. The gallery is a con
job. That is lots of talking to make you believe what is happening is
legitimate. You know the law and care less what they say. If you do not know
the law shut up and learn it.
Because if they violate what you recorded as evidence with the court clerk,
which is your proof to prosecute on.
On Dec 9, 2021, 3:56 PM -0700, nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx <nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Charkie:
How do you specifically call out your Common Law Jurisdiction when appeared
at their courts:
On Thursday, December 9, 2021, 07:12:29 AM PST, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do not use court cases but find it intresting read to guide one to truth. I
see it more as milk then meat to eat. That requires debate on what is lawful.
The goverment definition by codes makes it clear that I'm a national.
Definition of national is one with allegience to the state. It also states a
birth certificate is proof of that. The truth is the organic law documents
are my defense and it calls me a free citizen who may be a fugitive from
codes, or an inhabitant, so journer. Probably a rebel or an even an enemy of
the United States. Depending how one defines it.
What I do know is I'm not in there jurisdicton by constitution contract. I
know my agreement with the people that we are all free citizens, inhabitants
and most likely fugitives if we dealt with governments. I've got a creator,
and a creators conscience.
I know we are all created equal and that is meat to chew to grasp the whole
truth of what is equal? Seldom does a scale balance.
I do not care if Glenn, Veritas, a supreme court judge or charley: they all
are just opinions that need absorbed into one's life to use beneficially.
That is to make the concept into a workable solution. One may say, knowledge
to wisdom. Without it, one struggles.
Call me anything you want. Just make sure that when I file my paper with the
clerk that they knows I'm supreme in my common law court. That jurisdicton
allows me to make the rules. If you do not like them. File a claim of injury
or get a jury to disagree with me. If you do not know how? You may get
treated badly.
Thomas Jefferson: to expect liberty and be ignorant; is something that never
was or will be. (Paraphrased)
On Dec 9, 2021, 6:55 AM -0700, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
speaking of quo warranto..
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Relator_(law)
Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973): Judge Reynolds
permitted the discovery. He found that the argument for confidentiality was
outweighed by two policies favoring disclosure. First was ‘ the broad
federal mandate for discovery in all civil actions,’ that is, the federal
policy of liberal pretrial discovery as a basis principle of the modern
federal procedural scheme. The second reason inheres in the civil rights
laws themselves:
[I]t is the manner of enforcement which gives § 1983 its unique
importance, for enforcement is placed in the hands of the people. Each
citizen ‘ acts as a private attorney general who ‘ takes on the mantel of
the sovereign,’ ' guarding for all of us the individual liberties
enunciated in the Constitution. Section 1983 represents a balancing feature
in our governmental structure whereby individual citizens are encouraged to
police those who are charged with policing us all. Thus, it is of special
import that suits brought under this statute be resolved by a determination
of the truth rather than by a determination that the truth shall remain
hidden.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 7:52 AM veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
theres a difference between a free state citizen and us citizen. if you
dont believe so i find it curious that youre here considering its the
main thing glenn teaches, and i have proven.
Justice CAMPBELL (Supreme Court of the United States) dissenting:
Individuals are not the creatures of the State, but constitute it. They
come into society with rights, which cannot be invaded without injustice.
DODGE v. WOOLSEY, 59 U.S. 331
gamble v u.s (2019) breif overview of objections, thomas, ginsburg: When
the original States declared their independence, they claimed the powers
inherent in sovereignty .... The Constitution limited but did not abolish
the sovereign powers of the States, which retained `a residuary and
inviolable sovereignty.' The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed.
1961). Thus, both the Federal Government and the States wield sovereign
powers, and that is why our system of government is said to be one of
`dual sovereignty.' Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111 S.Ct.
2395, 115 L.Ed.2d 410] (1991)." Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic
Assn., 584 U.S. ___, ___, 138 S.Ct. 1461, 1475, 200 L.Ed.2d 854 (2018).
...But there is a difference between the whole and a single part, and
that difference underlies decisions as foundational to our legal system
as McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). There, in
terms so directly relevant as to seem presciently tailored to answer this
very objection, Chief Justice Marshall distinguished precisely between
"the people of a State" and "[t]he people of all the States," id., at
428, 435; between the "sovereignty which the people of a single state
possess"...Stare decisis has its pedigree in the unwritten common law of
England. As Blackstone explained, the common law included "[e]stablished
customs" and "[e]stablished rules and maxims" that were discerned and
articulated by judges. 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of
England 68-69 (1765) (Blackstone). In the common-law system, stare
decisis played 1983*1983 an important role because "judicial decisions
[were] the principal and most authoritative evidence, that [could] be
given, of the existence of such a custom as shall form a part of the
common law." Id., at 69. Accordingly, "precedents and rules must be
followed, unless flatly absurd or unjust," because a judge must issue
judgments "according to the known laws and customs of the land" and not
"according to hisprivate sentiments" or "own private judgment." Id., at
69-70. In other words, judges were expected to adhere to precedents
because they embodied the very law the judges were bound to
apply...Importantly, however, the common law did not view precedent as
unyielding when it was "most evidently contrary to reason" or "divine
law." Blackstone 69-70. The founding generation recognized that a "judge
may mistake the law." Id., at 71; see also 1 Kent 444 ("Even a series of
decisions are not always conclusive evidence of what is law"). And
according to Blackstone, judges should disregard precedent that
articulates a rule incorrectly when necessary "to vindicate the old
[rule] from misrepresentation." Blackstone 70; see also 1 Kent 443 ("If
... any solemnly adjudged case can be shown to be founded in error, it is
no doubt the right and the duty of the judges who have a similar case
before them, to correct the error"). He went further: When a "former
decision is manifestly absurd or unjust" or fails to conform to reason,
it is not simply "bad law," but "not law" at all. Blackstone 70
(emphasis). This view—that demonstrably erroneous "blunders" of prior
courts should be corrected—was accepted by state courts throughout the
19th century. See, e.g., McDowell v. Oyer, 21 Pa. 417, 423 (1853); Guild
v. Eager, 17 Mass. 615, 622 (1822).
Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system established by the Federal
Constitution, however, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in the governed.
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n,
576 U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin
v. Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun,
supra, at 26-30. Insofar as a crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a
sovereign, Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382, 43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the
people, the "original fountain of all legitimate authority," The
Federalist No. 22, at 152 (A. Hamilton); see Note, Double Prosecution by
State and Federal Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80
Harv. L. Rev. 1538, 1542 (1967).
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 10:45 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From veritas reading
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In our constitutional republic, Justice Brandeis
observed, the title of citizen is superior to the title of President.
Thus, the questions "[w]ho is the citizen[?]" and "what is the meaning
of the term?" Aristotle, Politics bk. 3, reprinted in part in READINGS
IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 55, 61 (Francis W. Coker ed., 1938), are no
less than the questions of "who constitutes the sovereign state?" and
"what is the meaning of statehood as an association?"
Who is the citizen? I view myself in the Republic more a free citizen
then a state citizen associated to a society and worst called goverment
who has its own desires and often contrary to mind.
I'm in society as a contributor of goods others want and I profit and
so do they. I'm not much for public schools, or creating a public
funded gym but rather let one citizen create as ones passion and vision
a need for others. Not a few leaders of a community wanting my money to
create it. I believe in home school, and not public school. Because my
children needed far more freedom then a public school could offer. They
needed more time to explore their ambitions and curiosity. Travel with
me today.
I do not like state citizenship on the local level at all. I support
citizenship to protect the country. I'll fight for it.
So yes, to protect myself I require a trial by jury and live my life As
friendly member of society. Not knowing when a trial by jury may judge
me. Not an attorney or a judge representing a corporation. I try to use
arbitration to settle affairs and encourage my business associates to
allow the panel make the final verdict then a court. Many avoid this
thinking an attorney will grant them something magical.
In the Republic our forefathers gave us the choice to be more free but
it is riskier then living by regulations created by society government
that are written on tablet. I chose to be a free citizen and not a
state citizen. I chose a trial by jury and not jury trial. Arbitration
over a court when possible. It's an enlienable right to do this. Most
people prefer to be a state citizen.
Quo habeas corpus comes often as I require the court of a free citizen.
Quo warranto follows with the question, by what authority? Your not
taking my inelienable rights away or my friends rights. Every state
district court honors it when one is in jail. Other states the
appellate or state supreme court. The jailer is required to answer; by
what authority do you hold me. The jailer is required to submit it to
the court. The courts charging one has to answer to the same and one
could or can use it on a simple traffic ticket if they want to.
Simple traffic ticket. I prefer as all know to send the prosecutors
court that he does not have jurisdiction in a simple statement. That is
telling the prosecutor your reply to arraignment and one is not
required to go as yippy answered. The Prosecutor either drops the case
or schedules an trial For you to appear. He should notify you that he
has stilled the trial and date. Some do not. When one misses he again
has a choice. To motion for your arrest or dismiss the case. Your
choice when you will call for prosecutor and his Corp to appear. I
prefer they arrest me but others may say I'll do it right after given a
ticket by officer.
Whenever one will eventually open and start their common law court.
Your paperOr document that I'll not discuss will establish your court.
So when filed with the court clerk you get an extra copy and a court
date thirty days or. Send to the prosecutor and he most likely will not
respond or show. Go to court on date allot and deflate default
judgement. Or pick your jury and convict. Your choice.
I'll be a free citizen.
On Dec 8, 2021, 6:29 AM -0700, veritas ghost
<guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
COURT HALTS VACCINE REQUIREMENT FOR FED CONTRACTORS (peggy, if you
havent seen my last fires of freedom special edition, i think youll
enjoy 18 usc 245, and just in case us For A constitution art 4 sec 4
and 2.
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In our constitutional republic, Justice
Brandeis observed, the title of citizen is superior to the title of
President. Thus, the questions "[w]ho is the citizen[?]" and "what is
the meaning of the term?" Aristotle, Politics bk. 3, reprinted in
part in READINGS IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 55, 61 (Francis W. Coker
ed., 1938), are no less than the questions of "who constitutes the
sovereign state?" and "what is the meaning of statehood as an
association?" tuaua v us (2015)
Justice CAMPBELL (Supreme Court of the United States) dissenting:
Individuals are not the creatures of the State, but constitute it.
They come into society with rights, which cannot be invaded without
injustice. DODGE v. WOOLSEY, 59 U.S. 331
Vattel Law of Nations, Book 2 Article 132: "God has created heaven
for himself and his saints, and has given the earth to mankind,
intending it for the advantage of the poor as well as of the rich.
The roads are for their use, and God has not subjected them to any
taxes." 39:13)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=u7FdLQ5H0e0
Radioactive Water From Pilgrim Nuclear Plant To Be Released Into Cape
Cod Bay (slosh more pigs. if youre reading this its to late. 2:09)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jbsWAJhq36I
No Jab, No Food: Canadian Province Imposes New Regulations to Ban
Unvaccinated from Grocery Stores
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/no-jab-no-food-canadian-province-imposes-new-regulations-ban-unvaccinated-grocery-stores/
House Democrats + RINO Kinzinger Pass Bill That Would Allow Debt
Ceiling Hike with Simple Majority in the Senate
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/developing-house-democrats-rino-kinzinger-pass-bill-allow-debt-ceiling-hike-simple-majority-senate/
Pacific Eclipse – A tabletop exercise on smallpox pandemic response
(4:51)
https://odysee.com/@ChadChaddington:d/Pacific-Eclipse-A-Smallpox-Pandemic-Tabletop-Exercise-(Share-This!):d
Son Vaccinated in Exchange for Pizza without Parental Consent (2:55)
https://odysee.com/@Adverse:c/vaccinemandate:4
At Least 3 Children Die and 120 Hospitalized in Vietnam After
Receiving Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine – 4 Adults Die from Vero Cell Covid
Vaccine
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/least-3-children-die-120-hospitalized-vietnam-receiving-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-4-adults-die-vero-cell-covid-vaccine/
Rockwood School District Admits to Calling the FBI on Parents
…UPDATED: With Response from Rockwood School District
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/rockwood-school-district-admits-calling-fbi-parents/
Darpa [has for a long time been] Creating Super Humans [you people
thought captain america was just a game and fictional character?]:
Former Gov't Employee Predicts Cataclysmic Extinction Level Event
(8:39)
https://rumble.com/vqdjzo-darpa-creating-super-humans-former-govt-employee-predicts-cataclysmic-extin.html
It’s not up to us (41 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/it%E2%80%99s-not-up-to-us:c
CHECKPOINTS if you want to leave (58 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/checkpoints-if-you-want-to-leave:e
Dr Shillary Jones & Lorraine Shamelessly Lie About Unjabbed
Hospitalisation Figures (5:24)
https://odysee.com/@WEGOTAPROBLEM:f/dr-shillary-jones-lorraine-shamelessly:c
VAERS show HOT LOTS Within Lots (29:33)
https://odysee.com/@Welcometheeagle88:4/VAERS-show-HOT-LOTS-Within-Lots!:1
JAIL for sneezing (47 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/jail-for-sneezing:b
THE USA FOR THE FINAL CARD? OR JUST A REALLY DARK WINTER. (5:49)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/khYlbY5bXEqY/
WHY DID THEY CHANGE THE TORONTO CHRISTMAS MARKET TO THE DISTILLERY
WINTER VILLAGE? (12:37)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3wCLKch7h1k/
Leaked Video Shows Boris Johnson’s Spox Laughing About Christmas
Party That Took Place Amid Covid Lockdown
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/watch-leaked-video-shows-boris-johnsons-spox-laughing-christmas-party-took-place-amid-covid-lockdown/
Office clean (24 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/office-clean-%F0%9F%87%A8%F0%9F%87%B3:9
Elon Musk Warns That ‘Civilization Is Going to Crumble (2:33)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wN-IgeCx-AY
Elon Musk – Calls for Congress to Throw Out Biden’s ‘Build Back
Better Bill’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/richest-man-world-elon-musk-calls-congress-throw-bidens-build-back-better-bill-dont-pass/
SATANIC CULT MEMBERS WHO ARE PLANNING THE SACRIFICE OF CHILDREN (2:48)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Nqg5N6tUr2Xg/
BLOOD SACRIFICE AGENDA. BE THE RESISTANCE (6:52)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Bagz1AsUNEvf/
Comrade Down: Saule Omarova Withdraws Nomination for Comptroller of
the Currency
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/breaking-comrade-saule-omarova-withdraws-nomination-comptroller-currency/
Sam White won Appeal Case in UK High Court - video-statement (1:31)
https://odysee.com/@OzFlor:7/S67:2
RABBI IS NOT AFRAID ON THE EVIL PSYCHOPATHS IN GOVERNMENT HE IS
AFRAID OF STUPID PEOPLE (im not afraid of either but i feel his
sentiment. 59 sec)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WXEsDyxmkUwB/
You Can’t Say That On Tv (3:44)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nY2KiNQtCTM
CDC - Why Critical Thinking Is Dangerous (8:13)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=TNaT5A-1gHc
