theres a difference between a free state citizen and us citizen. if you
dont believe so i find it curious that youre here considering its the main
thing glenn teaches, and i have proven.
Justice CAMPBELL (Supreme Court of the United States) dissenting:
Individuals are not the creatures of the State, but constitute it. They
come into society with rights, which cannot be invaded without injustice.
DODGE v. WOOLSEY, 59 U.S. 331
gamble v u.s (2019) breif overview of objections, thomas, ginsburg: When
the original States declared their independence, they claimed the powers
inherent in sovereignty .... The Constitution limited but did not abolish
the sovereign powers of the States, which retained `a residuary and
inviolable sovereignty.' The Federalist No. 39, p. 245 (C. Rossiter ed.
1961). Thus, both the Federal Government and the States wield sovereign
powers, and that is why our system of government is said to be one of `dual
sovereignty.' Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452, 457 [111 S.Ct. 2395, 115
L.Ed.2d 410] (1991)." Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn., 584
U.S. ___, ___, 138 S.Ct. 1461, 1475, 200 L.Ed.2d 854 (2018). ...But there
is a difference between the whole and a single part, and that difference
underlies decisions as foundational to our legal system as McCulloch v.
Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). There, in terms so directly
relevant as to seem presciently tailored to answer this very objection,
Chief Justice Marshall distinguished precisely between "the people of a
State" and "[t]he people of all the States," id., at 428, 435; between the
"sovereignty which the people of a single state possess"...Stare decisis
has its pedigree in the unwritten common law of England. As Blackstone
explained, the common law included "[e]stablished customs" and
"[e]stablished rules and maxims" that were discerned and articulated by
judges. 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 68-69 (1765)
(Blackstone). In the common-law system, stare decisis played 1983*1983 an
important role because "judicial decisions [were] the principal and most
authoritative evidence, that [could] be given, of the existence of such a
custom as shall form a part of the common law." Id., at 69. Accordingly,
"precedents and rules must be followed, unless flatly absurd or unjust,"
because a judge must issue judgments "according to the known laws and
customs of the land" and not "according to hisprivate sentiments" or "own
private judgment." Id., at 69-70. In other words, judges were expected to
adhere to precedents because they embodied the very law the judges were
bound to apply...Importantly, however, the common law did not view
precedent as unyielding when it was "most evidently contrary to reason" or
"divine law." Blackstone 69-70. The founding generation recognized that a
"judge may mistake the law." Id., at 71; see also 1 Kent 444 ("Even a
series of decisions are not always conclusive evidence of what is law").
And according to Blackstone, judges should disregard precedent that
articulates a rule incorrectly when necessary "to vindicate the old [rule]
from misrepresentation." Blackstone 70; see also 1 Kent 443 ("If ... any
solemnly adjudged case can be shown to be founded in error, it is no doubt
the right and the duty of the judges who have a similar case before them,
to correct the error"). He went further: When a "former decision is
manifestly absurd or unjust" or fails to conform to reason, it is not
simply "bad law," but "not law" at all. Blackstone 70 (emphasis). This
view—that demonstrably erroneous "blunders" of prior courts should be
corrected—was accepted by state courts throughout the 19th century. See,
e.g., McDowell v. Oyer, 21 Pa. 417, 423 (1853); Guild v. Eager, 17 Mass.
615, 622 (1822).
Justice GINSBURG, dissenting: In the system established by the Federal
Constitution, however, "ultimate sovereignty" resides in the governed.
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Comm'n, 576
U.S. ___, ___, 135 S.Ct. 2652, 2675, 192 L.Ed.2d 704 (2015); Martin v.
Hunter's Lessee, 1 Wheat. 304, 324-325, 4 L.Ed. 97 (1816); Braun, supra, at
26-30. Insofar as a crime offends the "peace and dignity" of a sovereign,
Lanza, 260 U.S. at 382, 43 S.Ct. 141, that "sovereign" is the people, the
"original fountain of all legitimate authority," The Federalist No. 22, at
152 (A. Hamilton); see Note, Double Prosecution by State and Federal
Governments: Another *1991 Exercise in Federalism, 80 Harv. L. Rev. 1538,
1542 (1967).
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 10:45 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From veritas reading
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In our constitutional republic, Justice Brandeis
observed, the title of citizen is superior to the title of President. Thus,
the questions "[w]ho is the citizen[?]" and "what is the meaning of the
term?" Aristotle, Politics bk. 3, reprinted in part in READINGS IN
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 55, 61 (Francis W. Coker ed., 1938), are no less than
the questions of "who constitutes the sovereign state?" and "what is the
meaning of statehood as an association?"
Who is the citizen? I view myself in the Republic more a free citizen
then a state citizen associated to a society and worst called goverment who
has its own desires and often contrary to mind.
I'm in society as a contributor of goods others want and I profit and so
do they. I'm not much for public schools, or creating a public funded gym
but rather let one citizen create as ones passion and vision a need for
others. Not a few leaders of a community wanting my money to create it. I
believe in home school, and not public school. Because my children needed
far more freedom then a public school could offer. They needed more time to
explore their ambitions and curiosity. Travel with me today.
I do not like state citizenship on the local level at all. I support
citizenship to protect the country. I'll fight for it.
So yes, to protect myself I require a trial by jury and live my life As
friendly member of society. Not knowing when a trial by jury may judge me.
Not an attorney or a judge representing a corporation. I try to use
arbitration to settle affairs and encourage my business associates to allow
the panel make the final verdict then a court. Many avoid this thinking an
attorney will grant them something magical.
In the Republic our forefathers gave us the choice to be more free but it
is riskier then living by regulations created by society government that
are written on tablet. I chose to be a free citizen and not a state
citizen. I chose a trial by jury and not jury trial. Arbitration over a
court when possible. It's an enlienable right to do this. Most people
prefer to be a state citizen.
Quo habeas corpus comes often as I require the court of a free citizen.
Quo warranto follows with the question, by what authority? Your not taking
my inelienable rights away or my friends rights. Every state district court
honors it when one is in jail. Other states the appellate or state supreme
court. The jailer is required to answer; by what authority do you hold me.
The jailer is required to submit it to the court. The courts charging one
has to answer to the same and one could or can use it on a simple traffic
ticket if they want to.
Simple traffic ticket. I prefer as all know to send the prosecutors court
that he does not have jurisdiction in a simple statement. That is telling
the prosecutor your reply to arraignment and one is not required to go as
yippy answered. The Prosecutor either drops the case or schedules an trial
For you to appear. He should notify you that he has stilled the trial and
date. Some do not. When one misses he again has a choice. To motion for
your arrest or dismiss the case. Your choice when you will call for
prosecutor and his Corp to appear. I prefer they arrest me but others may
say I'll do it right after given a ticket by officer.
Whenever one will eventually open and start their common law court. Your
paperOr document that I'll not discuss will establish your court. So when
filed with the court clerk you get an extra copy and a court date thirty
days or. Send to the prosecutor and he most likely will not respond or
show. Go to court on date allot and deflate default judgement. Or pick your
jury and convict. Your choice.
I'll be a free citizen.
On Dec 8, 2021, 6:29 AM -0700, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
COURT HALTS VACCINE REQUIREMENT FOR FED CONTRACTORS (peggy, if you havent
seen my last fires of freedom special edition, i think youll enjoy 18 usc
245, and just in case us For A constitution art 4 sec 4 and 2.
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In our constitutional republic, Justice Brandeis
observed, the title of citizen is superior to the title of President. Thus,
the questions "[w]ho is the citizen[?]" and "what is the meaning of the
term?" Aristotle, Politics bk. 3, reprinted in part in READINGS IN
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 55, 61 (Francis W. Coker ed., 1938), are no less than
the questions of "who constitutes the sovereign state?" and "what is the
meaning of statehood as an association?" tuaua v us (2015)
Justice CAMPBELL (Supreme Court of the United States) dissenting:
Individuals are not the creatures of the State, but constitute it. They
come into society with rights, which cannot be invaded without injustice.
DODGE v. WOOLSEY, 59 U.S. 331
Vattel Law of Nations, Book 2 Article 132: "God has created heaven for
himself and his saints, and has given the earth to mankind, intending it
for the advantage of the poor as well as of the rich. The roads are for
their use, and God has not subjected them to any taxes." 39:13)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=u7FdLQ5H0e0
Radioactive Water From Pilgrim Nuclear Plant To Be Released Into Cape Cod
Bay (slosh more pigs. if youre reading this its to late. 2:09)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jbsWAJhq36I
No Jab, No Food: Canadian Province Imposes New Regulations to Ban
Unvaccinated from Grocery Stores
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/no-jab-no-food-canadian-province-imposes-new-regulations-ban-unvaccinated-grocery-stores/
House Democrats + RINO Kinzinger Pass Bill That Would Allow Debt Ceiling
Hike with Simple Majority in the Senate
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/developing-house-democrats-rino-kinzinger-pass-bill-allow-debt-ceiling-hike-simple-majority-senate/
Pacific Eclipse – A tabletop exercise on smallpox pandemic response (4:51)
https://odysee.com/@ChadChaddington:d/Pacific-Eclipse-A-Smallpox-Pandemic-Tabletop-Exercise-(Share-This!):d
Son Vaccinated in Exchange for Pizza without Parental Consent (2:55)
https://odysee.com/@Adverse:c/vaccinemandate:4
At Least 3 Children Die and 120 Hospitalized in Vietnam After Receiving
Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine – 4 Adults Die from Vero Cell Covid Vaccine
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/least-3-children-die-120-hospitalized-vietnam-receiving-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-4-adults-die-vero-cell-covid-vaccine/
Rockwood School District Admits to Calling the FBI on Parents …UPDATED:
With Response from Rockwood School District
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/rockwood-school-district-admits-calling-fbi-parents/
Darpa [has for a long time been] Creating Super Humans [you people thought
captain america was just a game and fictional character?]: Former Gov't
Employee Predicts Cataclysmic Extinction Level Event (8:39)
https://rumble.com/vqdjzo-darpa-creating-super-humans-former-govt-employee-predicts-cataclysmic-extin.html
It’s not up to us (41 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/it%E2%80%99s-not-up-to-us:c
CHECKPOINTS if you want to leave (58 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/checkpoints-if-you-want-to-leave:e
Dr Shillary Jones & Lorraine Shamelessly Lie About Unjabbed
Hospitalisation Figures (5:24)
https://odysee.com/@WEGOTAPROBLEM:f/dr-shillary-jones-lorraine-shamelessly:c
VAERS show HOT LOTS Within Lots (29:33)
https://odysee.com/@Welcometheeagle88:4/VAERS-show-HOT-LOTS-Within-Lots!:1
JAIL for sneezing (47 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/jail-for-sneezing:b
THE USA FOR THE FINAL CARD? OR JUST A REALLY DARK WINTER. (5:49)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/khYlbY5bXEqY/
WHY DID THEY CHANGE THE TORONTO CHRISTMAS MARKET TO THE DISTILLERY WINTER
VILLAGE? (12:37)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3wCLKch7h1k/
Leaked Video Shows Boris Johnson’s Spox Laughing About Christmas Party
That Took Place Amid Covid Lockdown
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/watch-leaked-video-shows-boris-johnsons-spox-laughing-christmas-party-took-place-amid-covid-lockdown/
Office clean (24 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/office-clean-%F0%9F%87%A8%F0%9F%87%B3:9
Elon Musk Warns That ‘Civilization Is Going to Crumble (2:33)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wN-IgeCx-AY
Elon Musk – Calls for Congress to Throw Out Biden’s ‘Build Back Better
Bill’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/richest-man-world-elon-musk-calls-congress-throw-bidens-build-back-better-bill-dont-pass/
SATANIC CULT MEMBERS WHO ARE PLANNING THE SACRIFICE OF CHILDREN (2:48)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Nqg5N6tUr2Xg/
BLOOD SACRIFICE AGENDA. BE THE RESISTANCE (6:52)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Bagz1AsUNEvf/
Comrade Down: Saule Omarova Withdraws Nomination for Comptroller of the
Currency
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/breaking-comrade-saule-omarova-withdraws-nomination-comptroller-currency/
Sam White won Appeal Case in UK High Court - video-statement (1:31)
https://odysee.com/@OzFlor:7/S67:2
RABBI IS NOT AFRAID ON THE EVIL PSYCHOPATHS IN GOVERNMENT HE IS AFRAID OF
STUPID PEOPLE (im not afraid of either but i feel his sentiment. 59 sec)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WXEsDyxmkUwB/
You Can’t Say That On Tv (3:44)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nY2KiNQtCTM
CDC - Why Critical Thinking Is Dangerous (8:13)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=TNaT5A-1gHc
