THE SIMPSONS ? (1:30)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=w34aM4kX1jI
SEND TEXT MESSAGES VIA YOUR THOUGHTS (13:26)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=egbrMuDXE3E
Biden to Request Another $11.7 Billion in Emergency Funding For Ukraine
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/america-last-joe-biden-request-another-11-7-billion-emergency-funding-ukraine/
Biden Covid Czar Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: “The Goal in My Mind is Not
to Go Back to Normal, the Goal is to Build a Very Different New Normal”
(VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/biden-covid-czar-says-quiet-part-loud-goal-mind-not-go-back-normal-goal-build-different-new-normal-video/
Department of Veterans Affairs to Provide Abortion Services to Pregnant
Veterans and VA Beneficiaries
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/department-veterans-affairs-provide-abortion-services-pregnant-veterans-va-beneficiaries/
Come to our s**thole (1:28)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/come-to-our-s**thole:d
GOVERNMENT CONTROLLING YOUR THERMOSTAT (22:41)
https://odysee.com/@WAM:0/governmentcontrollingyourthermostatwam:8
They’re coming for Christmas (13:24)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/they%E2%80%99re-coming-for-christmas:4
BREAD LINES ARE COMING (9:33)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VybzZfMAFKw/
Don’t use the electric…but buy electric cars (1:29)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/don%E2%80%99t-use-the-electric%E2%80%A6but-buy:c
thought they were meant to catch the wind? (42 sec)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/i-thought-they-were-meant-to-catch-the:3
CLOWN SHOW: Biden’s Commerce Secretary Promises Unemployed Coal Workers
They’re Going to do Solar Installations for Abandoned Coal Mines
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/clown-show-bidens-commerce-secretary-promises-unemployed-coal-workers-going-solar-installations-abandoned-coal-mines-wth/
John Podesta To Serve As White House Senior Advisor For Clean Energy
Innovation And Implementation
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/creepy-john-podesta-serve-white-house-senior-advisor-clean-energy-innovation-implementation/
Deadliest Mass Drowning at the Border in Recent Years — Eight Illegal
Immigrants Found Dead in Rio Grande, Texas
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/deadliest-mass-drowning-border-eight-illegal-immigrants-found-dead-rio-grande-texas/
IRS Publishes Confidential Information of 120,000 Taxpayers Online, Then
Blames ‘Human Coding Error’ (if people looked at tax cases instead of
attempting to discredit others i think they would see what they find is
interesting. no time for that thought i just need to squeak at someone to
try to make myself feel important lol.)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/irs-publishes-confidential-information-120000-taxpayers-online-blames-human-coding-error/
Sadiq Khan Urged Met Police Chief To Break The Law For Political Gain (2:24)
https://odysee.com/@WEGOTAPROBLEM:f/sadiq-khan-urged-met-police-chief-to:c
Wisconsin man Criminally Charged for Election Fraud after He Conducted a
Sting to Expose Ballot Security Vulnerabilities in Wisconsin
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/retired-police-officer-criminally-charged-election-fraud-conducted-sting-expose-ballot-security-vulnerabilities-wisconsin/
Tony Bobulinski Says Top FBI Official Tim Thibault Buried Info He Gave to
Bureau on Biden Family Criminal Acts
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/oh-changes-everything-biden-family-whistleblower-tony-bobulinski-says-top-fbi-official-tim-thibault-buried-info-gave-bureau-biden-family-criminal-acts/
https://t.me/marksteele5g/9037
Clown Planet # 75 (1:23)
https://odysee.com/@CarlVernon:7/clown-planet-75:3
Here We Go: WHO Investigates Mysterious Respiratory Illness ‘Very Similar
to Covid’ in Argentina After Three Deaths and Six Ill
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/investigate-mystery-respiratory-illness-similar-covid-argentina-three-deaths-six/
2 Dead, 74 Hospitalized, 2 In Critical Condition While Running Marathon
(2:20)
https://odysee.com/@jeremypoole:b/marathan-death:9
GP's Given Bumper Pay Rise Despite Turning Away Patients For 2 Years (2:12)
https://odysee.com/@WEGOTAPROBLEM:f/gp's-given-bumper-pay-rise-despite:e
(5:46)
https://t.me/marksteele5g/9040
https://t.me/marksteele5g/9038
Angry Canadians SHAME & YELL Treasonous MP's Concentration Camp
Announcement (19 mins)
https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Canada-concentration-camps:c
Private NYC School Director Who Bragged About ‘Sneaking’ Left-Wing
Political Agenda Into Classrooms Placed on Leave After Project Veritas
Exposé
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/private-nyc-school-director-bragged-sneaking-left-wing-political-agenda-classrooms-placed-leave-project-veritas-expose/
Election Material Preservation Mandated. It’s Not Over.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/breaking-new-hampshire-lawsuit-names-harri-hursti-lhs-associates-defendants-election-material-preservation-mandated-not/
White House Interpreter (parody) (14 sec)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2P2dCpwtMNo
6 TOP Crops to Grow at Home to Save You From STARVING (12:34)
https://odysee.com/@OzFlor:7/020922:2
BE A MAN IN COURT (29:34)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=-TyWQdT4xGQ
NEPIS 30 October 21 DIY Form 1020 Successes (1:30:58)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=L3EdYSYNe58
Do you Know Who You are? 7 of 7.wmv (6:40)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=wKqFy9atnXM
Insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land,
(constitution) it is superseded thereby..no one is bound to obey an
unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. 16 Am Jur 2d
177, Late Am Jur 2d. 256
The stare decisis doctrine and its exceptions do not apply where a lower
court is compelled to apply the precedent of a higher court. See 20
Am.Jur.2d Courts § 183 (1965).
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no
rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona,
384 U.S. 436, 491.
CONNOR,Justice (Supreme Court of Alaska):Under the supremacy clause of the
United States Constitution, this court and everyother court in the United
States are boundby each and every applicable provision of the United States
Constitution. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. (1 Wheat.) 304 (1816). The
United States Supreme Court is the final arbiter of that document. United
States Constitution Article III; Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137
(1803). Hanby v. State, 479 P.2d 486 (1970)
Justice SUTHERLAND (Supreme Court of the United States) delivered the
opinion of the Court:
It is by that law, [The Constitution. ] and not otherwise, that the
legislative, executive, and judicial agencies which it created exercise
such political authority as they have been permitted to possess. The
Constitution speaks for itself in terms so plain that to misunderstand
their import is not rationally possible. CARTER v. CARTER COAL CO. 298 U.S.
238 (1936)
BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice (Supreme Court of Alaska):
It is, of course, a mere platitude to say that the people are the supreme
power in our system of government. The history of our constitution and its
adoption... shows beyond the possibility of contradiction that the people
themselves deliberately and intentionally announced that, by its adoption,
they meant to exercise their supreme sovereign power directly to a far
greater extent than had been done in the past... . Whitman v. Moore, 125
P.2d 445, 450-51 (Ariz. 1942), Overruled on other grounds, Renck v.
Superior Court, 187 P.2d 656, 660-61 (Ariz. 1947). [***]
The basic principles for interpreting statutes apply to
constitutions, [Statutes are strictly interpreted, and against government
and in favor of the accused to protect our freedom against abuse and
usurpation. ] and thus, to resolve this question, we shall turn to the
language of section 7 construed in light of the purpose of the provision.
We are especially sensitive to the policy concerns embodied in
constitutional provisions because a constitution is a document
"unchangeable by ordinary means," Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch)
137, 177 (1803), which "must be considered as a living document adaptable
to changing conditions and circumstances unanticipated at the time it was
written." Warwick v. State ex rel. Chance, 548 P.2d 384, 391 (Alaska 1976)
(footnote omitted). [***] Art. I, s 1, of the Alaska Constitution states:
Inherent Rights. This constitution is dedicated to the principles that all
persons have a natural right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness,
and the enjoyment of the rewards of their own industry; that all persons
are equal and entitled to equal rights, opportunities, and protection under
the law; and that all persons have corresponding obligations to the people
and to the State. Thomas v. Bailey, 595 P.2d 1 (1979).
HODGES, Justice (Supreme Court of Oklahoma) dissenting:
In an old English legal commentary (I Blackstone Commentaries. 242) the
basis for the doctrine was explained: '*** no suit or action can be brought
against the King, even in civil matters, because no court can have
jurisdiction over him. For all jurisdiction implies superiority of power.
Authority to try would be vain and idle, without an authority to redress;
and the sentence of a court would be contemptible, unless that court had
power to command the execution of it; but who, says Finch, shall command
the King.' NEWMAN v. The STATE of Oklahoma ex rel, 1971 OK 84 (1971). [See
all jurisdiction implies superiority: Muni v. Hart, 6 La.Ann. 570 (1851);
MAURAN v. SMITH, 8 R.I. 192 (1865); STATE v. FLETCHER, 39 Mo. 388 (1867);
STATE v. TOWN COUNCIL, 18 R.I. 258 (1893); STATE v. STONE, 120 Mo. 428
(1894); ELLINGHAM Sec. of St v. DYE, 178 Ind. 336 (1912); STATE v. HEDRICK,
294 Mo. 21 (1922); DRIGGS v. UTAH TEACHERS, 105 Utah 417 (1943); NEITING v.
BLONDELL, 306 Minn. 122 (1975)
Justice DANIEL (supreme Court of the United States) delivered the opinion
of the court:
The rights and powers of sovereignty, on the part of Spain, over the
territory, ceased with her transfer of that sovereignty to another
government; it could not exist in different governments or nations at the
same time. The power to preserve the peace and order of the community may
be admitted to have been in the officers previously appointed by Spain,
until the actual presence of the agents of the succeeding government; but
this would not imply sovereign power still remaining in Spain,--for if she
[or We the People. ] continued to be sovereign after expressly conceding
her sovereignty to another government, she might still rightfully resist
and control that government; for sovereignty from its nature is never
subordinate. THE UNITED STATES v. REYNES, 50 U.S. 127
CONNOR,Justice (Supreme Court of Alaska):Under the supremacy clause of the
United States Constitution, this court and everyother court in the United
States are boundby each and every applicable provision of the United States
Constitution. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. (1 Wheat.) 304 (1816). The
United States Supreme Court is the final arbiter of that document. United
States Constitution Article III; Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137
(1803). Hanby v. State, 479 P.2d 486 (1970)
PINKNEY, Attorney General, in reply:Sovereigns are equal. It is the dutyof
a sovereign, notto submit his rights to the decision of a co-sovereign. He
is the solearbiter of his own rights. He acknowledgesnosuperior, but God
alone. To his equals, he shown respect, but notsubmission.THE SCHOONER
EXCHANGE v. McFADDON, 11 U.S. 116
Justice Brown (Supreme Court of the United States) announced the conclusion
and judgment of the court:
Notwithstanding its duty to 'guarantee to every state in this Union a
republican form of government' (art. 4, ß 4), by which we understand,
according to the definition of Webster, 'a government in which the supreme
power resides in the whole body of the people, and is exercised by
representatives elected by them,' [….] The court was of opinion that if
these terms, 'states of the Union,' were held to exclude the District of
Columbia and the territories, [….] DOWNS v. BIDWELL, 182 U.S. 244
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In our constitutional republic, Justice Brandeis
observed, the title of citizen is superior to the title of President.
Justice GORSUCH, concurring: In this country, the federal government
"deriv[es] its powers directly" from the sovereign people, McCulloch v.
Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 404-405 (1819), and is empowered to act only in
accord with the terms of the written Constitution the people have approved,
Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 176-177 (1803). Empires and duchies in
Europe may have subscribed to the "doctrine . . . that the people were made
for kings, not kings for the people." The Federalist No. 45, p. 289 (C.
Rossiter ed. 1961) (J. Madison). "Monarchical and despotic governments" may
possess the power to act "unrestrained by written constitutions." Downes,
182 U. S., at 380 (Harlan, J., dissenting). But our Nation's government
"has no existence except by virtue of the Constitution," and it may not
ignore that charter in the Territories any more than it may in the States.
Id., at 382. In 1898, the very same year as the Spanish-American War, a
lopsided majority of this Court judged it "beyond question" that the
Constitution's jury-trial guarantees reached "the territories of the United
States." Thompson v. Utah, 170 U. S. 343, 346-347 (1898) (Harlan, J.).
Nearly 80 years before that, the Court held that the Constitution's Tax
Uniformity Clause constrained legislation governing the District of
Columbia. Loughborough v. Blake, 5 Wheat. 317, 319 (1820) (Marshall, C.
J.). United States v. MADERO No. 20-303 (April 21, 2022)
DIMOND, Senior Justice (Supreme Court of Alaska):
Rule 60(b)(4) provides as follows: On motion and upon such terms as are
just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a
final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: ....
(4) the judgment is void; ... As stated in Wright & Miller, "[A] motion
under this part of the rule differs markedly from motions under the other
clauses of Rule 60(b).... [T]here is no time limit on an attack on a
judgment as void." 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure
ß 2862, at 197 (1973)..
This court has previously stated what is meant by the term void: A judgment
is void where the state in which the judgment was rendered had no
jurisdiction to subject the parties or the subject matter to its control,
or where the defendant was not given proper notice of the action and
opportunity to be heard, or where the judgment was not rendered by a duly
constituted court with competency to render it, or where there was a
failure to comply with such requirements as are necessary for the valid
exercise of power by the court. Holt v. Powell, 420 P.2d 468, 471 (Alaska
1966) (footnotes omitted). See also Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., 520
P.2d 1352, 1354 (Alaska 1974). BURRELL v. BURRELL, 696 P.2d 157 (1984)
When the Gas Fumes hit (1:01)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=x0N1dk0cbkM
