J_B
I've heard it before but I'm an explorer. I try to never walk in the path
others have traveled or myself has gone. I want to know every thing there is to
know. If someone, probably high in government would sit me down and explain;
teach me these things as it would be easier.
Thanks for the warning.
I do know some have written and got it. So they say. What is intresting is its
on your record of communications of the document. Of course most important
thing is still to know how to go to court and they recognize your state
national status. Because I'll not use the passport except as backup. Not only
about educating myself but those on the otherside.
Many of you heard some wild statements from me and is true that I'll do. If not
now eventually because I need to know. My curiosity needs to know.
On Mar 6, 2021, 1:44 PM -0700, Elim Hill <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
JB,
What would your instructions be?
Thanks,
John
On Saturday, March 6, 2021, 3:34:07 PM EST, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
do not attach files or affirmations of your "national position" or saying ur
a national or non citizen of USADC you will be rejected. if u want to make
sure ur a state national when filling it out.. email me for directions
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 7:21 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All them constitutions which means agreements have little to do with a
sovereign.
Organic law documents are better to study as they are still valid in courts
as a fact.
Declaration of Independence, articles of confederation, northwest
ordinance, and the Constitution of the United States of America. These
documents can be used as a judicial notice which the court cannot debate.
All those agreements or constitutions have nothing to do with you and I.
Why? Because not one of them abolished the agreement of organic law. Just
like the constitution of the United States did not abolish the other
agreements of organic law,a but recognized them. Even UCC 1-103-6 "codes
are complimentary to common law which is still in affect."
Amendments were passed but even like the Fourteenth the court says it did
not change pass agreements but it added a bunch for their side of the
agreement. It's like zip codes. Zip codes have lots of significance if your
in their jurisdiction. Otherwise it means nothing to free people with a
contract called the constitution of the United States of America.
Someone will say it does matter. Just look at a passport. True only because
people do not want to go to court to prove the agreement/constitution is
true and accurate. I'll be doing my passport shortly. I'll fill it out with
a letter attached stating my national position. Will see how it goes. That
will be in their record of my position with that document. I'm a sovereign
citizen. My heritage/parent birthright grants me sovereignty or state
national. The goverment made me a citizen and I get to choose what I'll
participate in and to what extent. The goverment created the definition so
people will not use it as their liberty grants. More importantly understand
we get or can get benefits from both by our liberty. View their policies as
a contract proposed and your going to modify it in court to your liking.
The contract has not yet been agreed to by you till the court decision
settled.
Your jurisdicton allows one to make the rules accordingly and a jury or
grand jury only decides who violated who. If any jury or grand jury thinks
they have greater power. They better think about their authority over
another man and the same can be done to them. That is the same problem with
government.
On Mar 6, 2021, 4:42 AM -0700, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
