do not attach files or affirmations of your "national position" or saying
ur a national or non citizen of USADC you will be rejected. if u want to
make sure ur a state national when filling it out.. email me for directions
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 7:21 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All them constitutions which means agreements have little to do with a
sovereign.
Organic law documents are better to study as they are still valid in
courts as a fact.
Declaration of Independence, articles of confederation, northwest
ordinance, and the Constitution of the United States of America. These
documents can be used as a judicial notice which the court cannot debate.
All those agreements or constitutions have nothing to do with you and I.
Why? Because not one of them abolished the agreement of organic law. Just
like the constitution of the United States did not abolish the other
agreements of organic law,a but recognized them. Even UCC 1-103-6 "codes
are complimentary to common law which is still in affect."
Amendments were passed but even like the Fourteenth the court says it did
not change pass agreements but it added a bunch for their side of the
agreement. It's like zip codes. Zip codes have lots of significance if your
in their jurisdiction. Otherwise it means nothing to free people with a
contract called the constitution of the United States of America.
Someone will say it does matter. Just look at a passport. True only
because people do not want to go to court to prove the
agreement/constitution is true and accurate. I'll be doing my passport
shortly. I'll fill it out with a letter attached stating my national
position. Will see how it goes. That will be in their record of my position
with that document. I'm a sovereign citizen. My heritage/parent birthright
grants me sovereignty or state national. The goverment made me a citizen
and I get to choose what I'll participate in and to what extent. The
goverment created the definition so people will not use it as their liberty
grants. More importantly understand we get or can get benefits from both by
our liberty. View their policies as a contract proposed and your going to
modify it in court to your liking. The contract has not yet been agreed to
by you till the court decision settled.
Your jurisdicton allows one to make the rules accordingly and a jury or
grand jury only decides who violated who. If any jury or grand jury thinks
they have greater power. They better think about their authority over
another man and the same can be done to them. That is the same problem with
government.
On Mar 6, 2021, 4:42 AM -0700, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
Windows 10
