Charley, agree with most of what u state herein.
Not with using the term sovereign citizen. The State's definition of SC
appears to lead the state to believe one is an insurrectionist.
Charley, what is ur view of the 1783 Treat of Peace with regard to being a
Founding Document?
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
________________________________
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Charley
Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 6, 2021 7:18:27 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: anna summary dates of the
four constitutions
All them constitutions which means agreements have little to do with a
sovereign.
Organic law documents are better to study as they are still valid in courts as
a fact.
Declaration of Independence, articles of confederation, northwest ordinance,
and the Constitution of the United States of America. These documents can be
used as a judicial notice which the court cannot debate.
All those agreements or constitutions have nothing to do with you and I. Why?
Because not one of them abolished the agreement of organic law. Just like the
constitution of the United States did not abolish the other agreements of
organic law,a but recognized them. Even UCC 1-103-6 "codes are complimentary to
common law which is still in affect."
Amendments were passed but even like the Fourteenth the court says it did not
change pass agreements but it added a bunch for their side of the agreement.
It's like zip codes. Zip codes have lots of significance if your in their
jurisdiction. Otherwise it means nothing to free people with a contract called
the constitution of the United States of America.
Someone will say it does matter. Just look at a passport. True only because
people do not want to go to court to prove the agreement/constitution is true
and accurate. I'll be doing my passport shortly. I'll fill it out with a letter
attached stating my national position. Will see how it goes. That will be in
their record of my position with that document. I'm a sovereign citizen. My
heritage/parent birthright grants me sovereignty or state national. The
goverment made me a citizen and I get to choose what I'll participate in and to
what extent. The goverment created the definition so people will not use it as
their liberty grants. More importantly understand we get or can get benefits
from both by our liberty. View their policies as a contract proposed and your
going to modify it in court to your liking. The contract has not yet been
agreed to by you till the court decision settled.
Your jurisdicton allows one to make the rules accordingly and a jury or grand
jury only decides who violated who. If any jury or grand jury thinks they have
greater power. They better think about their authority over another man and the
same can be done to them. That is the same problem with government.
On Mar 6, 2021, 4:42 AM -0700, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Sent from
Mail<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986&data=04%7C01%7C%7Ca629673994fb4b995c0208d8e09a9662%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637506301843727967%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=rBl6LH6kE2DbiBiu%2B8ZkVUMNjNOgEIHf%2BmNZE4qGkFo%3D&reserved=0>
for Windows 10
