As I get older, I hear far too tales of unscrupulous lawyers and judges
ransacking estates of the elderly
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Monday, April 25, 2022, 01:40:31 PM CDT, Paul M
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
never admit you have fallen, another excuse to lock you up - for your own
good, in order to seize your assets
On Monday, April 25, 2022, 08:24:35 AM CDT, veritas ghost
<guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
if you have a public defender and you dont want her like any lawyer you fire
her. its because they want to paste you as incompetent, therefore not sovereign
and free as we all already are and acting together to try to coerce you. when
they have a psychiatrists start asking you questions start recording and tell
them you dont consent to any medical proceedings then ask them if whats going
on is any of their business. if they say no direct them to say you passed the
psyc eval then leave, if they go on to ask what you mean, say your building a
case against them and whoever else wants to give you a psyc eval for rico,
coercion, medical coercion [medical and securities fraud on part of the public
impersonators and psycologist], conspiracy to deprive rights, depervation of
rights under color of law, violations of the iccpr, as well as the geneva
convention [ie war crimes] and unless they want to be attached to the claim act
accordingly say you passed the eval and to let you go; because your not
consenting to be a political or medical prisoner.
if they decide their going to take you hostage call 911 on them then when your
done start telling people you know so they know where you are and to spread the
word that they have taken you hostage. thats basically what ramola d did when
they did that to her, boris just asks if its any of their business then if they
want it to be, i go to directly building a case against them for trying to
essentially make me a political prisoner by political smear tactis of trying to
paint me incompetant or crazy for something judges are required to be versed
on, first and fourth amendment protected activity and either they brush that
eval under the rug or i opt to start runnin their rope up a tree to lynch them
in the form of their pocket and/or their job.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022, 7:38 PM Baird Fairbairn <b2ready2001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I appreciate all the articles you guys send.
I do have a question for you guys. I went to court last week to ditch this bar
"defender" to do the work needed on my case. The judge explained that I
would need to do my Psych evaluations that the public "defender" suggested in
her motion 11(the only movement from defense on this case) since December.
I have been trying to get her to file motions and submit my status paperwork
to establish standing. She refused her last excuse was let's see what happens
at the psych evaluations and court in May which if not for the rule 11 motion
she filed would be the end of the rope.due to my right to a speedy trial. But
now her advice is wait to see what happens at the psych evals/courtdate. psych
evals are tomorrow and Tuesday.
I can't help to wonder why they are so hell bent on these psych
evaluations. Anyone of the times I actually chose to speak nobody in the right
mind could assume I was inept. Should I just stop playing their games and stop
jumping through hoops obtain the gsa bonds ? I'm fully aware of the fraudulent
proceedings that take place at the court house.
I have recieved my passport filing as a national. I've filed the ucc1,
amended and ucc3. And filed the common law copyright with the county. Notified
the attorney general, the state Attorney and all parties of my status change.
Please let me know I'm at the point now that I'm done playing their games.
Baird concerned American
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, 9:19 AM dr.richard.cordero_esq
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of thisemail.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media aswidely as
possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We thePeople; e.g., click
“Reply All” andsend. To subscribeto articles similar to the one
hereunder go to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel
↓Register; or + New or Users >Add New; or fill out the NewUser form at
https://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/wp-admin/user-new.php .
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it showsirregularities
when received, they crept in during transit and are beyond mycontrol. Kindly
overlook them. A pdf version of this article -as such likely tobe free of
irregularities- is found here and downloadable throughthe next link. Advocates
of Honest Judiciaries
thinking critically and taking action
at the most propitious time
to persuade journalists to investigate judges' abuse of power; and
to set in motion a national, single issue, civic movement for
judicial abuse exposure, compensation of abusees, and reform
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , ;
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx Dear Advocates
of Honest Judiciaries, Thank you for your emails. A. The need to take action
now 1. I appreciate your sharing my article withothers by clicking “Reply All”
and “Send”. Although you mayreceive the same article repeatedly, by so doing
you are sharing it with different blocs ofaddressees in the To: box. 2. We need
people who take action atthis most propitious time for exposing judges’ abuse
of power and financial criminality, as explainedhereunder. 3. Indeed, we are
all united by ourcommitment to attaining one common objective: to expose
judges’ abuse and criminalityandobtain compensation for the harm that judges
have caused us. 4. That commitment requires effort to read, reread, and read
again the below article until you understand the out-of-court strategy to
inform and outrage the national public so that it demands that journalists and
primarying politicians expose judges and hold them accountable and liable to
compensate the victims of their abuse and criminality.
a. Here applies the axiom of strategic thinking, "Those who cannot do the least
cannot do more". Those who cannot read even an article written for their
benefit will keep roboticly seeking their remedy alone in court only to be
further abused by judges...and will keep whining about it.
5. The required effort includes sharing this article andmy other ones by
clicking "Reply All" and "Send";and posting it to social media, such as:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, Instagram, GooglePlus, Pinterest,
Reddit, Snapchat, WhatsAp
Tweet: Tell journalists and politicians your story of judges' abuse of powerto
participate in unprecedented citizens hearings and demand compensation and
reform;
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_your_story_for_media&citizens_hearings.pdf
6. This group is not a law debating society.Nor a mutual commiseration therapy
group. 7. We are people committedto implementing the above-stated out-of-court
inform and outrage strategy by forming a national, single issue, civic
movementfor judicial abuse of power exposure, compensation of abusees, and
reform. 8. If you are truly committed to the effort of informing and outraging
the national public, let nothing derail you from its pursuit. When you receive
an email that is off subject, uninformative,or otherwise inappropriate,
politely let the sender know…or simply clickdelete, which is what I do to any
email that uses foul language, for that istotally unacceptable. We will not let
the bad and unprofessional behavior of some people justify judges' dismissal of
pro ses and all other Advocates of Honest Judiciaries as 'a bunch of
disgruntled losers'. Far from it, we want the national public, journalists, and
primarying politicians recognize and look up to us as Champions of Justice.
9. If you ask me to remove you from my emailinglist because you are receiving
too many and unhelpful emails, that means thatthe effort to click "Delete" is
more harmful to you than all theabuse that you allegedly suffered or are
suffering at the hands of judges. Lucky for you,you have not been and are not
being abused at all. 10. Take action! Read, Share, Write andrealize… B. The
need to analyze with critical judgmenteverything we hear or read 11. Your link,
advocate Tak, characterizes thecomplaint filed by a neighbor of Ardee as
“baseless”. Understandably, thatupset you given that it led to Ardee’s 72-hour
commitment to a psychiatric ward. 12. Now you have to use criticaljudgment to
analyze that link, never mind the article downloaded through it. 13. You
cannot simply jump to theconclusion, perhaps in line with your experience, that
the complaint was “baseless”just because it was so characterized by somebody
somewhere. That would onlyshow bias toward believing anything that was negative
about ‘the system’ or ‘thepolice’ or ‘social services’. 14. You always need to
be criticaleven when the information that you receive supports your beliefs.
15. Hence, ask yourself: a. Who wrote that article? b. How much do they have
to lose or gain bystating something sensationalist? c. Do they make money
depending on how many timespeople view their articles and click their
advertisement spots? d. Do they work for a reputable publisher worthsuing for
defamation for making incorrect statements, a risk that increases itsinterest
in ensuring that all its statements are correct? e. Or do they work for a
no-name start-up digitalpublisher that can hardly pay for its Internet
connection so it is onlyinterested in increasing itsnumber of clickers even if
they are a full fool followercomplement? 16. The complaint was filed by
“aneighbor”. So ask yourself: a. How manytimes before had that neighbor
complained about Ardee? b. What was the nature of those complaints? c. Was
there violence or threats to someone’s orthe public’s safety? d. If Ardee had
been harmed because none ofhis/her neighbors cared enough to abide by the
public safety instruction, “Ifyou see something, say something”, would you
blame the neighbors for their crassself-centeredness and culpable indifference?
e. If your neighbors did not bother to alert theauthorities when they had
reason to believe that you were in danger, would you feelsafer or so much
lonelier and abandoned? 17. You need to be critical at alltimes…because there
is ALWAYS only six feet away from you the attorney for theopposing party, who
is paying attention to every word that you say and do notsay and is taking
notes. And when it is her turn, she will cross-examine you. 18. And if you
were never criticalof what you heard or read and simply used it if it comforted
your prejudices,that is, your previous judgments, that opposing counsel will
tear you to pieceson the stand in front of the jury and the journalists in the
audience in court and out of court via video conference! And youwill have let
all of us down. 19. And when you step down from thewitness stand and walk to
your seat you are going to feel so very small,humiliated, and dissatisfied with
yourself because you failed to thinkcritically: You could and should have asked
yourself those questions. 20. That is why you are going to thinkcritically!
So, on the stand you will earn the respect and the attention ofeverybody,
including the judge, all of us, and the national public because everybody
realizes thatyou are a responsible, fair, and thoughtful person. You meet the
legal standardof “a reasonable, impartial observer who proceeded responsibly
under thecircumstances to inform herself of the facts”. 21. Help us become like
you. Set theright example. Teach pro ses to think critically so that we all
earn publicrespect and support.
1. An exercise in thinking critically
22. Practice analyzing the subjectline of this email: Re:What did Judge
Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Thomas know about judges’abuse of power and
when did they know it? 23. Does that subject line show that I amracist because
I make reference to Judge Jackson and Justice Thomas given that they are the
two most talked-aboutjurists at the moment, and they happen to be Black, or
does it show that I wantjournalists and politicians to cross-examine them to
expose the ‘abuse of power by judges’, who include allthose judges who are
white, yellow, brown, male, female, Christian, Muslim,Hispanic, whatever!? 24.
“Judges” arethe ones that my subject line criticizes for abusing power,not the
two named jurists who knew about it or should have known had they proceeded
with due diligence to safeguard the integrity of judicial process. Thequestions
that the subject line implicitly asks of them are: a. What did they do based on
that knowledge or dothey lack any knowledge because they engaged in willful
blindness and willfulignorance?(jur:90§§b-c)
b. Did they use their knowledge or their means ofgaining it to ensure the
integrity of judicial process or did they disregard itto cover up for their
“brothers and sisters of the robe” and avoid being treated as their traitors?
c. Have they shown enough respect for judicialintegrity to remain on the bench
or should their complicit conduct cause such outrage out of court in an
informed public as to deprive them of public trust, thus requiring that they
resign…togetherwith the abusive judges that they covered up for? 25. It is
imperative for Advocates, including all pro ses, to think critically at every
step of the way toward forming a movement for judicial exposure of judges'
abuse, compensation, and reform, so that they may be recognized and followed by
the national public as its Champions of Justice.
C. Every meaningful cause needs resources for itsadvancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money 26. Lip service
advances nothing; butit continues to enable the abusers. 27. Put your money
where youroutrage at abuse and quest for justice are. 28. Support the
professional lawresearch and writing, and strategic thinking at:
JudicialDiscipline Reformhttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org DONATE by ;
making a deposit or an online transfer through either the BillPay feature of
your online account or Zelle from your account to TD Bank account # 43 92 62
52 45, routing # 260 13 673; or Citi Bank account # 4977 59 2001, routing # 021
000 089. Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it. Sincerely, Dr. Richard
Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ,
CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’semail and e-cloud storage accounts described at
*>ggl:1 et seq. and † >OL2:1114§G,when emailing him, copy the above bloc of his
email addresses and paste it inthe To: line of your email so as to enhance the
chances of your email reachinghim at least at one of those
addresses.*******************************
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We the People;
e.g., click “Reply All” and send. To subscribe to articles
similar to the one hereunder go to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;
<left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it shows irregularities
when received, they crept in during transit and are beyond my control. Kindly
overlook them. A pdf version of this article -as such likely to be free of
irregularities- is found here and downloadable through the next link.
Journalists interested in ascoop and a Pulitzer Prize;
primarying politicians; and
thoseoutraged by The Wall Street Journal finding in only a sample of casesthat
“131 FederalJudges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial
Interest”,
yet they have been
neitherinvestigated by either their Federal Judiciary or former chief judge
nowAttorney General Merrick Garland,nor required to disgorgethe gains that they
grabbed,can use the officialstatistics of his and J. Ketanji Brown Jackson’s
District of Columbia Circuit
to show their participation in a cover-up
concerningtheir peers' law-breaking and other forms of abuse of power, and
effected by
dismissing 100% of complaints against their peers and
denying100% of petitions to review those dismissals,
thusrevealing their lack of courage to expose their peers’ abuse and
interest
innot being shunned as traitors but rather
inbeing accepted by their "brothers and sisters of the robe"
atthe expense of the complainants and
theintegrity of the system of justice, left to fester with
theunderlying and untreated cause for complaint:
judgesemboldened by reciprocally ensuring the risklessness of their abuse
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-journalists_politicians_scooping_judges_racketeering.pdf
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Journalists, Politicians, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
1. Justice nominee Ketanji Brown Jacksonwas confirmed by the Senate on April
7, 2022. However, she will not take herseat on the Supreme Court until the end
of this term in the summer. Thisaffords a unique opportunity to journalists,
including the media outlets forwhich they work, who want to make a scoop that
can lead to their winning aPulitzer Prize; principled and opportunistic
primarying politicians; and peopleinterested in the integrity of the judiciary:
a. They can examine the integrityand character of J. Brown Jackson and of
former chief judge now Attorney General (AG) Merrick Garland in light of the
official reports and statistics oftheir District of Columbia Circuit. There she
sat as a trial judge from 2013 to2021, and has sat as an appellate judge of the
Court ofAppeals for that Circuit(CADCC)since June 2021; and he served as that
Court's chief judge from 2013 to 2020.
b. Itfollows that the comments made here referring to J. Brown apply even
moreforcefully to Now-AG and Then-Judge and even Chief Judge Garland, asthey do
to Justice Clarence Thomas. Hence, suchapplication is not made explicit in
every instance.
A. The official statistics on complaints against judges
2. Those reports and statistics are submitted by the 13 U.S. courts of appeals,
including CADCC, and 2 national courts to Congressas a public document in the
Annual Report of the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
The director is appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court under Title
28 of the U.S. Code [of federal law only] section 601(28 U.S.C. §601).
3. Complaints against judges of a circuit can be filed by any person, including
a judge, under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980(the Act; id.
