If you go to their website, it states, they don't take tort claims.
On Saturday, May 22, 2021, 07:57:59 PM CDT, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
where is this Federal court of United states? address? how does one address
to get just compensation
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:43 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The thugs give citation with a court date. Immediately make a copy and put/
blank piece of paper. The article 1817 statement and to dismiss the case. That
stops the judge from doing anything further with the complaint. One could stop
there and wait for next move. Or if one is more aggressive. immediately send to
the United States federal claims court with a statement that I've posted here
from David Lester straight to be reimbursed for damages. The federal court is
the United States and not the United States of America Corp. That your dealing
with. That court will take care of who gets to pay and crimes. Just file what
happened and swear under oath.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 6:14 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Charley. Good stuff.
Only one question. You can post your business as you suggest and the thugs
still come in and start acting like they own the place. Are you saying don't
waste your time responding to some corporate agent health looser fines and
other acts of trespass, just put in a claim to the United States Court of
Claims? Please clarify.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:57 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In Colorado some politician's have told their favorite business to just say
your a private business. So others jumped on. Some learnt from our smoke dope
emporiums. It all comes back to the constitution. Article1;8;17 makes it clear
the government authority is only land they own. No where else in the
constitution does it ever mention"We the People" surrendered anything in
relation to our relationship to each other and the government controls
it.Article 6 says previous agreements are honored. The Articles of
confederation is one of those documents. That document created United States of
America a country and the PMA or common law trust agreement that states that
the free citizen and inhabitant members will agree. To this in order to
belong. Otherwise your not a member. Read the terms in that agreement,
Northwest Ordinance and Declaration of Independance included. The great rule
for business there is members promise to file claims with the other member and
they both agree a jury of members will decide. Not the private government
courts. One could hire a common law arbitration panel to do this or an assembly
if they are professional enough.
That is why the statement I tell people to use for traffic tickets should be
posted on their business door.Add to it that we are a private business and
government does not oversee our operating procedures. All government agents
send notice to this address and welcomed to do only private business here. Out
of courtesy one could send that same notice to the nearest policing agent. This
sign is a warning sign and if an agent comes in and starts walking as if he
owns the place. The owner needs to tell him to leave and if one does not. Send
a claim to the United States Court of federal claims. That will be financial
trespass recovery. It is their duty to apply criminal charges as they see fit.
That is how you tell them to pound salt. Go another step and tell them to take
their taxes and shove it. Or an agreement you will pay this percentage. Because
they say you volunteer. It's like a church everyone pays as they see fit and
all get the same services. At least till rules change.
Now for Minnesota. I've got no clue unless your talking about the one that
hired that group and I'll say. Good luck because there approach I have no clue
except to say. They are not in the private of the articles of confederation.
They are fighting in the legislative law. Need to send damages to the United
States Court of federal claims.
I know, I know, saying this makes everyone say. "No way charley. I've been
fighting and tried it," and I'll tell you to look closer to what I'm doing. It
works. For the restaurant in Minnesota. If she calls me. I'll take a percentage
but it will end and she will tell them to go pound salt. She can recover all
damages if she has documented them.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:52 AM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charley, when you say ma and pa became private businesses, how did they do
that? How do they tell the government lackeys that they have no authority over
a private business? Isn't there some lady in Minnesota that is suing the phony
corporate STATE OF MINNESOTA on this very issue. How are the other mom and pop
businesses going private w/out all the court battles? If businesses can learn
how to do this they can tell the corporate governments to pound salt. Can you
give us a view of how this is done?
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:47 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Convention of states is the worst concept to do in these troubled times and
truthfully anytime. When Americans wake up and realize how they have twisted
and abused the constitution under or watch. Just time to tell them no in the
courts. Articles of confederation are a common law trust but better then the
ones formed today. Many clubs have created their own and government cannot
touch them. Period. During the pandemic here many restraints. Ma and pa became
private business and stayed open. Private business is a form of common law
trust. Wake up and realize how powerful the condition is and just say no
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:36 PM Shining Emperor <nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don,
Your conclusions are correct of Rothschild CFR....influence, infiltration or
blunt 'ownership ' since Rothschild bought Is-ra-el years ago. Current Israel
jewelry are fake Jews converts, not Israelites mentioned in the Bible.
On Thu, May 20, 2021, 10:30 Don Mashak <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
I apologize in advance if this topic does not belong here.
I have reached the conclusion that the current "Convention of States" Movement
is beingfunded and run by Rothschild's "Council on Foreign Relations". The CFR
was founded byRothschilds frontmen Rockefeller, Warburg and JP Morgan in 1821.
Its agenda includesachieving the New World Order, One World Government and
generally advancing the
Progressive Globalist Agenda.
While I originally support the Convention of States, I changed my mind do to
thegreat involvement of CFR member Pete Hegseth.
Since Rothschilds Progressive Globalist Insurgency is the cause of our run
awayrogue government, logic says their CFRs involvement in the Convention of
Statesis an ill omen
Many speak of their concerns of a run away Covention of States repealing
theentire Constitution, which is what the Progressive Globalists want..
SO MY QUESTION IS, DO ANY OF YOU HAVE BETTER PROOFS THANI OF THE ROTHSCHILD'S
CFR'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE "CONVENTION OF
STATES MOVEMENT.
To give some sense of urgency, my understanding is only 38 states must ratify
the
call for a convention of states. And they already have 30 states that have
voted in favor.
I would appreciate your input.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 9:45:13 AM CDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
State citizen is a word to avoid. It has to many connotations. I'm a United
States of America national. Yes, one either studies to know the ins and outs or
you are always at the mercy who will defend you. For Anna. issue appears often
that she takes others people's words how to do something without knowing the
individual or method proven. So she has a hit and miss situation. Eventually
she will have it right. Glad to see the resistant she brings.
Many will not represent you as a lawyer in court proceedings which is paperwork
with their signature on paper. Because they get this little notice in the mail
that says; you have been reported for practicng law without registration and
they are investigating. Since very, very few know how to win in court. They
have no answer for this which is always a jail sentence if not defended
properly for so called practicing law. Which is where they should go for saying
they know but do not. The nice part of the notice is it comes from the state
Supreme Court and where it will be heard. State Supreme Court has Original
jurisdiction between a free State and State of state situations. All other
courts have general jurisdiction. What happens in all other courts depends on
them. Wither they choose to support the state or your position. A risk they
will take. Yes, even risk going to jail. Here is the position to take from my
experience of what works efficiently and consistently and my approach in a
"kis" method. Or as simple as one can make it.
The officer on the street approach. Staying cool is the best along with a
printed letter. I'll print as a two part bUT use as one letter you should
hand officers. Especially if you do not intend to give them your name. To
officers a name Is very important. Once they get that they can go to their
computer and have your state and federal history. Personally my view of
your/officer history of me is changing till you know who I really am. If
officer loses you in the system. They will spend hours putting your profile
back together. The best I can tell is most of this information is not shared
across state lines. If one gets a national passport;. That will be shared as it
is a United States recognized document. Giving them a regular and even expired
passport will be in all state systems and that gives identification without
address. If the officer really needs an address they can fill out form to get
it from the United States. They are satisfied with that. Even if you move the
address is then unknown till someone retrace or connects you to it. Personal
experience they will not arrest with that passport but you may still get a
ticket. FBI will keep that data and confidently for the most part.
To handle a ticket. Part one. "The Constitution of the United States of
America; Article 1, section 8, clause 17: I'm a United States of America
national and NOT an United States Citizen." Court will often send another
letter and sometimes even saying a warrant but have not heard from anyone of
them acting on it. The same happens with a national passport. I personally
travel with a regular expired passport. If they lose you in the system. They
will spend hours or days to reconstruct who you are. That is tying you to every
thing they have on you from a drivers license perspreactive.
Recently in Colorado it appeared the statement failed but upon further
investigation the case was closed and they opened another case with new case
number, added two more charges without notifying the individual. They then
handcuffed him then stopped for issues involved. That is fraud they were
counting on it not to be recognized. It shows to what crooked schemes they
will go to. Most send another notice and then answer with statement again to
cancel it. These crooks are willing to risk jail time in betting on your
ignorance.
To make the above quoted statement more solid, add the following on a piece of
paper to hand the officer. It will take care of issues like above mentioned.
Part two:"This national belongs to the best PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP CLUB: Articles
of Confederation and only nationals are allowed. United States Citizen's are
exempted. We protect life, liberty, and property of members and if you decide
to violate the private it is $500,000.00 dollars per occurrence for doing so.
Before interaction, give me your Business card of your private corporate
identification. Without it is another $500,000.00. Other charges may apply. "
One could make it $200,000.00 for each question or demand but without video
hard to prove. I suspect they would try to destroy your recordings. So be
careful if you go that route. They hate evidence of the facts. So I stay with
the obvious facts that can be proven easily.
Now if officer does not give you a business card and often they will not
because it is proof positive of the fact of what is going on and will be used
in court as an exhibit. They are considered out of uniform for not surrendering
it upon request. This letter with both qoute parts will be your exhibit in
court along with business card or lack thereof.
In court which is really just paper work sent to court clerk. That is your
court of record. Not to agency, but court clerk. So back to that first letter
on being a non-registered lawyer and they are investigating. I would not answer
it as it is not yet assigned a case number to send your response to court clerk
for your court recording. Wait for them to actually file charges before
replying. Then one can start their court record.
Most likely the general courts of jurisdiction will not grant you the money of
that large sum. They will ignore it or rule against you with an actual warrant
and arrest you. They will protect that money on a bet you do not know how or
procedure to get the money. They think you will persist in trying to get their
approval which they will not grant.
This is where the United States Court of Federal Claims comes in. This is the
court of redress for United States injuries. All governments are under the
United States authority. One can seek redress in all courts but this one is
the constutional one mentioned in the constitution. It sits right across the
street from Congress. My understanding is that from time to time they have to
go to Congress to get approval. Otherwise that court has prior approval to a
limited amount.
This letter needs written from the perspective of the contract states and here
is the damages. David Straight has a very simple format for this that I like.
Including property taxation reimbursement and ending property taxation.
Understanding of what is going on. We nationals have a private membership
association as they call it today. Back in colonial times it was seen as a
common law trust which is private when not done with the state registrar. That
trust is the articles of confederation, declaration of independance and
northwest ordinance. Who can belong, free citizens/nationals. What is the
purpose, to protect life, liberty, and property. What are the rules, they are
decided by a trial by jury with a claim of injury. Not due process of law in
their jurisdicton. Due process of law is a deceptive phrase. Due process in
their corporation or your association?
PMA have long been established across the country. The Boy Scouts got around
the gay issue with usage of PMA. Jaycess use it. Many golf courses use it and
why some kept blacks from entering. (I do not approve but it does show how
powerful the PMA is). In Colorado all but one vapor and drug emporium are PMA
and were that before the state started granting license. It was PMA that
changed Colorado and goverment said we better get involved and now are trying
to license them. As the leader of that situation states; when the state license
proves more lucrative to my bottom line. Then I'll get licensed. They also have
their own banking system because United States of America Corp. did not approve
the'joint smoke' so they could not use a regular bank.
Another deceptive phrase; private membership association. Which association is
the question. Private corporate registered with the state or common law trust
association?
Now comes the officer of the court (any oath taker). Since the Clearfield
doctrine of 1943 and Judges blue book which is a judges handbook on issues
that states the United States of America corporation is a 'private foreign
corporation'. Foreign to the constitution and a private membership association.
With all that understanding the point is that you want the officers business
card as he just identified his PMA to which you are not a member. It's a
corporate private association to which you and I can choose to belong by
acceptance. They need to prove you are a member. Claiming you are not as
illustrated above (quotations phrase) ends that controversy.Because they never
tell you this in your Miranda rights it is fraud. All contracts not clearly
revealed are fraud. There contract of how many agencies (6,000)- How can anyone
know the contract? Why each agency is a separate acceptancen contract to their
PMA.
Also, officers of the court have no standing or authority because a corporation
(United States of America Corporation) cannot be approved by a corporation
(United States) whose charter (constitution) does not grant to be an PMA; in
violation of the original charter.
That is as simple as I can make it. As a lawyer Charles does sign all papers
for his clients because my clients have to agree to be members of the PMA:
articles of confederation. I do not operate in their corporate PMA: United
States of America corporation or whatever they claim to be now as Anna states
they have been this and that and something else for years. Who knows, they may
be many PMA's. When Glenn gets riled about their priestly fraud. He has every
moral and ethical right to do so. When the bible states their is not one
righteous. Government proves it in magnitude proportion.
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:08 PM Aéius Cercle of Quantum-Note(Law-Division)
<Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The ultimate responsibility (for one's own remedies) rests within ourselves to
do our own due diligence and research/homework/field-testing/etc., anyway.
Sure, the so-called «gurus» can give us some ideas as to what to look at, but,
in the end, you should never blindly follow what anyone else says/claims (and
anybody who claims to «know everything» is automatically leading their
«followers» down a dangerous «cult-style» path of «dogmatic-followership»). The
guru still cannot «do your push-ups» for you in order for your «muscles» to get
stronger (metaphorically).
Some «remedies» do seem to be more consistent than others. Amongst the more
consistent ones seem to be the following...:
➤ Pre-emptive ESTOPPEL Notices
➤ Asking them questions that are «self-incriminating» if/when you are
confronted without cause*
➤ Printed NOTICES (warnings) that you can put on your front door, car-window,
covering the VIN-plate, etc.
➤ Compelling letters that demonstrate your «intellectual-superiority» over
them (this is a much more «advanced» way of handling things which takes far
more effort than some of the quicker «remedies» listed above as this particular
method requires a great deal of knowledge about psychology, the sciences, etc.,
and your ability to quote-reference from several «scientific» publications,
even to the point of providing the specific ISBNs so that there can be NO DOUBT
as to the «legitimacy» of the information where they cannot «claim» that you
were just «making stuff up» [most of them are «idiots» anyway who have never
read more than one non-fiction book in their whole entire lives if any]).
Ultimately, you are still dealing with what is essentially a «psychological
chess-game» (metaphorically speaking), when interacting with any part of the
«courts» related legalese-system (whether it be the cops out on the streets
trying to extort every penny out of you before you can even earn a penny or the
liars in the court-houses or otherwise).
On 2021-05-18 3:28 p.m., J_B wrote:
yes beware of ana.. shes hit or miss on her things but then again could be
people not knowing how to apply what she says in combination with crooked judge
hat wont follow it and therefore gives the image of false information
you want to be a state citizen
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:25 PM Joe Skelton <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
This sounds like some more of Anna's BS
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021, 02:49:21 PM CDT, The Moab <g2themoab@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
All born in the United States are initially Nationals. It does pertain
them, please research passport legal help for American National. by :
Hernandez-Jr: Gregorio
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED without Prejudice Confidentiality Notice: This private
electronic correspondence, including any/all attachment(s) are limited for the
sole use of the intended recipient and may contain Privileged and/or
Confidential Information.
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT. NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO
PRINCIPAL. Information in this or any following correspondence is not to be
construed as legal advice. [Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC §§
2510 et seq]
On Tue, May 18, 2021, 1:18 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
this refers to a "national of the US" Not a State Citizen of a State of the
Union. So how does it apply to my Citizenship? A State Citizen born on the soil
of Oklahoma?
On Sunday, May 16, 2021, 2:24:53 PM CDT, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/878 ;
Get Outlook for Android
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE