In Colorado some politician's have told their favorite business to just say
your a private business. So others jumped on. Some learnt from our smoke
dope emporiums. It all comes back to the constitution.
Article1;8;17 makes it clear the government authority is only land they
own. No where else in the constitution does it ever mention"We the People"
surrendered anything in relation to our relationship to each other and the
government controls it.
Article 6 says previous agreements are honored. The Articles of
confederation is one of those documents. That document created United
States of America a country and the PMA or common law trust agreement that
states that the free citizen and inhabitant members will agree. To this in
order to belong. Otherwise your not a member. Read the terms in that
agreement, Northwest Ordinance and Declaration of Independance included.
The great rule for business there is members promise to file claims with
the other member and they both agree a jury of members will decide. Not the
private government courts. One could hire a common law arbitration panel to
do this or an assembly if they are professional enough.
That is why the statement I tell people to use for traffic tickets should
be posted on their business door.Add to it that we are a private business
and government does not oversee our operating procedures.
All government agents send notice to this address and welcomed to do only
private business here.
Out of courtesy one could send that same notice to the nearest policing
agent.
This sign is a warning sign and if an agent comes in and starts walking as
if he owns the place. The owner needs to tell him to leave and if one does
not. Send a claim to the United States Court of federal claims. That will
be financial trespass recovery. It is their duty to apply criminal charges
as they see fit. That is how you tell them to pound salt. Go another step
and tell them to take their taxes and shove it. Or an agreement you will
pay this percentage. Because they say you volunteer. It's like a church
everyone pays as they see fit and all get the same services. At least till
rules change.
Now for Minnesota. I've got no clue unless your talking about the one that
hired that group and I'll say. Good luck because there approach I have no
clue except to say. They are not in the private of the articles of
confederation. They are fighting in the legislative law. Need to send
damages to the United States Court of federal claims.
I know, I know, saying this makes everyone say. "No way charley. I've been
fighting and tried it," and I'll tell you to look closer to what I'm doing.
It works. For the restaurant in Minnesota. If she calls me. I'll take a
percentage but it will end and she will tell them to go pound salt. She
can recover all damages if she has documented them.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:52 AM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charley, when you say ma and pa became private businesses, how did they doLife in one word--LOVE
that? How do they tell the government lackeys that they have no authority
over a private business? Isn't there some lady in Minnesota that is suing
the phony corporate STATE OF MINNESOTA on this very issue. How are the
other mom and pop businesses going private w/out all the court battles? If
businesses can learn how to do this they can tell the corporate governments
to pound salt. Can you give us a view of how this is done?
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:47 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Convention of states is the worst concept to do in these troubled times--
and truthfully anytime. When Americans wake up and realize how they have
twisted and abused the constitution under or watch. Just time to tell them
no in the courts. Articles of confederation are a common law trust but
better then the ones formed today. Many clubs have created their own and
government cannot touch them. Period. During the pandemic here many
restraints. Ma and pa became private business and stayed open. Private
business is a form of common law trust. Wake up and realize how powerful
the condition is and just say no
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:36 PM Shining Emperor <nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Don,Life in one word--LOVE
Your conclusions are correct of Rothschild CFR....influence,
infiltration or blunt 'ownership ' since Rothschild bought Is-ra-el years
ago. Current Israel jewelry are fake Jews converts, not Israelites
mentioned in the Bible.
On Thu, May 20, 2021, 10:30 Don Mashak <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello--
I apologize in advance if this topic does not belong here.
I have reached the conclusion that the current "Convention of States"
Movement is being
funded and run by Rothschild's "Council on Foreign Relations". The CFR
was founded by
Rothschilds frontmen Rockefeller, Warburg and JP Morgan in 1821. Its
agenda includes
achieving the New World Order, One World Government and generally
advancing the
Progressive Globalist Agenda.
While I originally support the Convention of States, I changed my mind
do to the
great involvement of CFR member Pete Hegseth.
[image: Inline image]
Since Rothschilds Progressive Globalist Insurgency is the cause of our
run away
rogue government, logic says their CFRs involvement in the Convention
of States
is an ill omen
Many speak of their concerns of a run away Covention of States
repealing the
entire Constitution, which is what the Progressive Globalists want..
SO MY QUESTION IS, DO ANY OF YOU HAVE BETTER PROOFS THAN
I OF THE ROTHSCHILD'S CFR'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE "CONVENTION OF
STATES MOVEMENT.
To give some sense of urgency, my understanding is only 38 states must
ratify the
call for a convention of states. And they already have 30 states that
have voted in favor.
[image: Inline image]
I would appreciate your input.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 9:45:13 AM CDT, Charley Dan <
charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
State citizen is a word to avoid. It has to many connotations. I'm a
United States of America national. Yes, one either studies to know the ins
and outs or you are always at the mercy who will defend you. For Anna.
issue appears often that she takes others people's words how to do
something without knowing the individual or method proven. So she has a hit
and miss situation. Eventually she will have it right. Glad to see the
resistant she brings.
Many will not represent you as a lawyer in court proceedings which is
paperwork with their signature on paper. Because they get this little
notice in the mail that says; you have been reported for practicng law
without registration and they are investigating. Since very, very few know
how to win in court. They have no answer for this which is always a jail
sentence if not defended properly for so called practicing law. Which is
where they should go for saying they know but do not. The nice part of the
notice is it comes from the state Supreme Court and where it will be
heard. State Supreme Court has Original jurisdiction between a free State
and State of state situations. All other courts have general jurisdiction.
What happens in all other courts depends on them. Wither they choose to
support the state or your position. A risk they will take. Yes, even risk
going to jail. Here is the position to take from my experience of what
works efficiently and consistently and my approach in a "kis" method. Or as
simple as one can make it.
The officer on the street approach. Staying cool is the best along with
a printed letter. I'll print as a two part bUT use as one letter you
should hand officers. Especially if you do not intend to give them your
name. To officers a name Is very important. Once they get that they can go
to their computer and have your state and federal history. Personally my
view of your/officer history of me is changing till you know who I really
am. If officer loses you in the system. They will spend hours putting your
profile back together. The best I can tell is most of this information is
not shared across state lines. If one gets a national passport;. That will
be shared as it is a United States recognized document. Giving them a
regular and even expired passport will be in all state systems and that
gives identification without address. If the officer really needs an
address they can fill out form to get it from the United States. They are
satisfied with that. Even if you move the address is then unknown till
someone retrace or connects you to it. Personal experience they will not
arrest with that passport but you may still get a ticket. FBI will keep
that data and confidently for the most part.
To handle a ticket. Part one.
"The Constitution of the United States of America; Article 1, section
8, clause 17: I'm a United States of America national and NOT an United
States Citizen." Court will often send another letter and sometimes even
saying a warrant but have not heard from anyone of them acting on it. The
same happens with a national passport. I personally travel with a regular
expired passport. If they lose you in the system. They will spend hours or
days to reconstruct who you are. That is tying you to every thing they have
on you from a drivers license perspreactive.
Recently in Colorado it appeared the statement failed but upon further
investigation the case was closed and they opened another case with new
case number, added two more charges without notifying the individual. They
then handcuffed him then stopped for issues involved. That is fraud they
were counting on it not to be recognized. It shows to what crooked schemes
they will go to. Most send another notice and then answer with statement
again to cancel it. These crooks are willing to risk jail time in betting
on your ignorance.
To make the above quoted statement more solid, add the following on a
piece of paper to hand the officer. It will take care of issues like above
mentioned.
Part two:
"This national belongs to the best PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP CLUB: Articles of
Confederation and only nationals are allowed. United States Citizen's are
exempted. We protect life, liberty, and property of members and if you
decide to violate the private it is $500,000.00 dollars per occurrence for
doing so. Before interaction, give me your Business card of your private
corporate identification. Without it is another $500,000.00. Other charges
may apply. "
One could make it $200,000.00 for each question or demand but without
video hard to prove. I suspect they would try to destroy your recordings.
So be careful if you go that route. They hate evidence of the facts. So I
stay with the obvious facts that can be proven easily.
Now if officer does not give you a business card and often they will
not because it is proof positive of the fact of what is going on and will
be used in court as an exhibit. They are considered out of uniform for not
surrendering it upon request. This letter with both qoute parts will be
your exhibit in court along with business card or lack thereof.
In court which is really just paper work sent to court clerk. That is
your court of record. Not to agency, but court clerk. So back to that first
letter on being a non-registered lawyer and they are investigating. I
would not answer it as it is not yet assigned a case number to send your
response to court clerk for your court recording. Wait for them to actually
file charges before replying. Then one can start their court record.
Most likely the general courts of jurisdiction will not grant you the
money of that large sum. They will ignore it or rule against you with an
actual warrant and arrest you. They will protect that money on a bet you do
not know how or procedure to get the money. They think you will persist in
trying to get their approval which they will not grant.
This is where the United States Court of Federal Claims comes in. This
is the court of redress for United States injuries. All governments are
under the United States authority. One can seek redress in all courts but
this one is the constutional one mentioned in the constitution. It sits
right across the street from Congress. My understanding is that from time
to time they have to go to Congress to get approval. Otherwise that court
has prior approval to a limited amount.
This letter needs written from the perspective of the contract states
and here is the damages. David Straight has a very simple format for this
that I like. Including property taxation reimbursement and ending property
taxation.
Understanding of what is going on. We nationals have a private
membership association as they call it today. Back in colonial times it was
seen as a common law trust which is private when not done with the state
registrar. That trust is the articles of confederation, declaration of
independance and northwest ordinance. Who can belong, free
citizens/nationals. What is the purpose, to protect life, liberty, and
property. What are the rules, they are decided by a trial by jury with a
claim of injury. Not due process of law in their jurisdicton. Due process
of law is a deceptive phrase. Due process in their corporation or your
association?
PMA have long been established across the country. The Boy Scouts got
around the gay issue with usage of PMA. Jaycess use it. Many golf courses
use it and why some kept blacks from entering. (I do not approve but it
does show how powerful the PMA is). In Colorado all but one vapor and drug
emporium are PMA and were that before the state started granting license.
It was PMA that changed Colorado and goverment said we better get involved
and now are trying to license them. As the leader of that situation states;
when the state license proves more lucrative to my bottom line. Then I'll
get licensed. They also have their own banking system because United States
of America Corp. did not approve the'joint smoke' so they could not use a
regular bank.
Another deceptive phrase; private membership association. Which
association is the question. Private corporate registered with the state or
common law trust association?
Now comes the officer of the court (any oath taker). Since the
Clearfield doctrine of 1943 and Judges blue book which is a judges
handbook on issues that states the United States of America corporation is
a 'private foreign corporation'. Foreign to the constitution and a private
membership association. With all that understanding the point is that you
want the officers business card as he just identified his PMA to which you
are not a member. It's a corporate private association to which you and I
can choose to belong by acceptance. They need to prove you are a member.
Claiming you are not as illustrated above (quotations phrase) ends that
controversy.
Because they never tell you this in your Miranda rights it is fraud.
All contracts not clearly revealed are fraud. There contract of how
many agencies (6,000)- How can anyone know the contract? Why each agency is
a separate acceptancen contract to their PMA.
Also, officers of the court have no standing or authority because a
corporation (United States of America Corporation) cannot be approved by a
corporation (United States) whose charter (constitution) does not grant to
be an PMA; in violation of the original charter.
That is as simple as I can make it. As a lawyer Charles does sign all
papers for his clients because my clients have to agree to be members of
the PMA: articles of confederation. I do not operate in their corporate
PMA: United States of America corporation or whatever they claim to be now
as Anna states they have been this and that and something else for years.
Who knows, they may be many PMA's. When Glenn gets riled about their
priestly fraud. He has every moral and ethical right to do so. When the
bible states their is not one righteous. Government proves it in magnitude
proportion.
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:08 PM Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The ultimate responsibility (for one's own remedies) rests within
ourselves to do our own due diligence and
research/homework/field-testing/etc., anyway. Sure, the *so-called*
«gurus» can give us some ideas as to what to look at, but, in the end, you
should never *blindly follow* what anyone else says/claims (and
*anybody* who *claims* to «know everything» is *automatically* leading
their «followers» down a dangerous «cult-style» path of
«dogmatic-followership»). The guru still cannot «do your push-ups»
*for* you in order for *your* «muscles» to *get stronger*
(metaphorically).
*Some* «remedies» do seem to be more consistent than others. Amongst
the *more consistent* ones seem to be the following...:
➤ Pre-emptive ESTOPPEL Notices
➤ Asking *them* questions that are «self-incriminating» if/when you
are confronted
*without cause* *➤ Printed NOTICES (warnings) that you can put on your
front door, car-window, covering the VIN-plate, etc.
➤ *Compelling letters* that demonstrate *your*
«intellectual-superiority» over *them* (this is a *much more*
«advanced» way of handling things which takes *far more effort* than
some of the *quicker* «remedies» listed above as this particular
method requires a great deal of knowledge about psychology, the sciences,
etc., and your ability to quote-reference from *several* «scientific»
publications, even to the point of providing the specific ISBNs so that
there can be NO DOUBT as to the «legitimacy» of the information where they
*cannot* «claim» that you were just «making stuff up» [most of them
are «idiots» anyway who have never read more than one non-fiction book in
their whole entire lives if *any*]).
Ultimately, you are still dealing with what is essentially a
«psychological chess-game» (metaphorically speaking), when interacting with
*any* part of the «courts» related legalese-system (whether it be the
cops out on the streets trying to extort every penny out of you before you
can even earn a penny or the liars in the court-houses or otherwise).
On 2021-05-18 3:28 p.m., J_B wrote:
yes beware of ana.. shes hit or miss on her things but then again could
be people not knowing how to apply what she says in combination with
crooked judge hat wont follow it and therefore gives the image of false
information
you want to be a state citizen
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:25 PM Joe Skelton <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This sounds like some more of Anna's BS
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021, 02:49:21 PM CDT, The Moab <
g2themoab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All born in the United States are initially Nationals. It does pertain
them, please research passport legal help for American National.
by : Hernandez-Jr: Gregorio
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED without Prejudice Confidentiality Notice: This
private electronic correspondence, including any/all attachment(s) are
limited for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain
Privileged and/or Confidential Information.
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT. NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO
PRINCIPAL. Information in this or any following correspondence is not to be
construed as legal advice. [Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC
§§ 2510 et seq]
On Tue, May 18, 2021, 1:18 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
this refers to a "national of the US" Not a State Citizen of a State of
the Union. So how does it apply to my Citizenship? A State Citizen born on
the soil of Oklahoma?
On Sunday, May 16, 2021, 2:24:53 PM CDT, NELSON DICE <
nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/878
Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
--
Life in one word--LOVE
