answer is yes you can sue under the Nuremberg code and under the fact its
not "approved"
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 5:52 PM prospectconnect@xxxxxxxxx <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can you Sue an Employer Who Mandates Vaccines? | Armstrong Economics
<https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/vaccine/can-you-sue-an-employer-who-mandates-vaccines/>
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 10:09:10 PM PDT, Charley Dan <
charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When Colorado tells that all that get the shot by some date and they will
randomly pick out five for a million dollars each and then tell you come
Sept they will knock on doors.
COUNT ME OUT!! NO VAX. Hear that ivermectin will cure and one can get a
prescription on line in a push way. Some countries have chosen this from
the outset and over the non-sense. True?
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 10:51 PM Michael Glavic <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Should COVID-19 vaccines be mandatory? Experts argue such measures aren’t
always effective
<https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-experts-argue-why-making-vaccinations-mandatory-doesnt-necessarily/>
Should COVID-19 vaccines be mandatory? Experts argue such measures aren’...
Introduction of mandatory vaccine policies is not always justified or
effective, some experts argue
<https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-experts-argue-why-making-vaccinations-mandatory-doesnt-necessarily/>
To someone (sarcastically?) saying if not acknowledging they couldn't have
put it better, (what I said earlier to this thread, at the Globe)
themselves, if not to my saying, "no," or thinking they understand
"justice" or how to serve it better than *I,* in such regard.. .
Well, if we can assume making vaccination mandatory is OK, or even
legitimately for us to decide and act upon as enforce, (however, but by
limitations to choices and/or abusive means coming to mind, where we aren't
even primarily about testing for who has what, and should be identified and
treated in such regard) I suppose I may as well assume we're all up to
challenging the law (etc.) as for actually being for justice in such
respect, whatever else should matter.
Bullying people to a consensus is not the way to serving justice, (like
with Jury Duty, if not politics, what justice there is in expecting people
to do so, otherwise, relative to those who directly if not more actually
"profit" from as much...) where providing the evidence if not more evidence
(if not such evidence) surely is..
Consider that, my saying So... as from a more logical or reasonable
perspective (of orientation, as to example) and not so much from a
politically correct or legal (law based, not so much of practice.. .)
perspective, to what ails us if not actually rectifies the matter, of our
abusiveness/unreasonableness, if not merely, otherwise, wink, wink?
We shouldn't have to do anything, otherwise.. .
Michael Glavic
So true Champion of Justice, Etc..
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 01:43:46 p.m. EDT, Michael Glavic <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Received.
I'd recommend declining to serve on "Jury Duty," (say, as a conscientious
objector, or whatever, of your true sovereignty, [and duty] otherwise, if
not So true, coming to mind of actually being something if not something So
if not even *more,* meaningful.. Hey, let's actually be "Evidenced
based," shall we, or screw your law, style and/or method, otherwise) or,
further to as much, castigating the legal system wherever and however you
can, otherwise, even before, when you think (how you do?) you're called to
do So, or probably get if not still get what you "deserve," how *I* do,
yeah, for *Justice Reform, *if not Constitutional (or national).) reform,
what sick if not meaningless (Disordered) nation I find we have if not are,
otherwise. No "hot shot" of politics, and complicit law... but what is "So
real and just," and getting things where they are cognitively if not
intelligently going, *Am I.. . *
Indeed, the pervasiveness of darkness and evil to/of our political and
legal system and development(s), to serving "Justice," if not God, if not
Everything *meaningful*... runs deep if not overwhelming to most, to
which I understand I help with and give example to what can only be, of
such, light, of truth, whether you think our minds are being censored if
not worse, or not (Like, where have you seem as much before) I Go So
faithfully and factually, Etc., like as much or not
Michael Glavic
Champion of as much
Or what. Screw with my internet, etc?. (I get that, easily covered up as
of something less.. .) Like someone thinks they're getting the real deal,
or the better of me... with screwing around by knowing what I if not WE
think and do in such respect. "They don't," (but by their filthy and game,
which I intend to prosecute or cleanse in such regard) I'm So sure, and
helping where and how I can if not, *best* in such respect. Hey, where
you thought *I* went away? .. . Not yet, if *ever.. . I Go with as much,
"H*opefully," (So hopefully) even *better* with time.. . I Feel I have
"time" on my side in such respect, and *Go,* accordingly, whatever else
should come along or, *logically/reasonably* does.. .
See *my* faith and facts (if not The facts, that should matter) *shining*
in such respect. I Do.. .
On "Shining," For Justice. I *appreciate* your work and contributions in
such regard
BWE
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021, 10:41:50 p.m. EDT, cordero <
dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*NOTES*: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this
email.
You are encouraged to *share* and post it to social media as
widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of *We the
People*; e.g*., click “Reply All” and send*.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register or +
New or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If it
shows irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and are
beyond my control. Kindly overlook them.
Writing your story of abuse by judges and guardians in up to 500 words by
applying the two-phase method; and using it for
demanding that the Biden Commission on Supreme Court reform
hear your testimony at its “public meetings”; and
asking universities and the media,
such as the news agencies Reuters, The Boston Globe,
Propublica, and The Washington Post,
to let the national public hear you by holding the proposed
unprecedented citizens hearings
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_
*method_for_writing_your_story*.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf>
By
*Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.*
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
*Judicial Discipline Reform*
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx , DrRCordero@
Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
A. Telling your story at the most opportune time: when people want to hear
it
1. This article lays out a two-phase method for you to write in up to 500
words the story of the abuse of power by judges that you have suffered or
witnessed.
2. Your effort in writing your story will pay off, for you will be doing
so at the most opportune time: when the public, journalists, universities,
and even many politicians want to hear about those stories in the context
of what will soon dominate the national debate: the Commission nominated
<https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/09/president-biden-to-sign-executive-order-creating-the-presidential-commission-on-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states/>
by President Biden on April 9, 2021, to study ways of reforming
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Biden_SCt_reform_Commission.pdf>
the Supreme Court; and the desire attributed to him and his party “to
pack the Supreme Court”, that is, to increase the number of justices from
9 to 15 and reduce their life-appointment to a term of years.
B. Composing an informative and brief story to be read, heard, and
investigated
3. You want to tell the national public your story of judges’ abuse of
power and make the public share your outrage at it. You also want your
story to be investigated by journalists.
4. But nobody is going to read the scores, never mind hundreds, of pages
generated by your case in court to figure out what your story is all about.
5. Moreover, at a hearing you will have only 5 minutes to tell your
story...a rambling account will not hold the attention of the audience even
that long.
6. In addition, journalists will not investigate a story that is confusing
and missing key pieces of information so that it fails to pique their
curiosity and makes them feel that it would not interest their own
audience.
Therefore, you will benefit from applying the method set forth below for
writing an informative and brief story. You will use it to rehearse your
oral delivery of it at a hearing.
C. Not a professionally written story, but written after doing one’s
homework
7. Research your own documents and cite them so that your story is
accurate and verifiable.
8. Write a story that is significant to the audience: You are not writing
a diary for your private reading. You are writing a story to be read by
others, your audience. Organize it chronologically so that it can be easily
followed by people who are totally unfamiliar with you and it.
9. Highlight the most outrageous events and avoid getting bogged down in
details unimportant to the story even if they are important to you. After
reading it, your audience should be able to exclaim: ‘The judge in this
story did A, B, and C. How outrageous!”
10. Edit your writing to make it as grammatically correct as you can so
that the audience’s attention is concentrated on your story without
grammatical mistakes distracting it and reflecting poorly on your degree of
education and attention to detail.
11. Your objectives are clear: Your accurate and verifiable story earns
you the respect and trust of your audience. Its significance to them earns
you their gratitude. All this may makes you attain your most important
objective: your audience’s action in support of your cause.
12. Your audience’s support will be more likely and stronger if you apply
to the writing of your story a principle of strategic thinking: “People
never listen so attentively and react so positively as when they listen to
avoid harm to themselves and their loved ones.”
13. Make your audience feel that the abuse by judges that you suffered or
witnessed can happen to them too. They can fall prey to the abusers. “
*No!* That is unacceptable. That is outrageous! I must support this
victim to end this abuse before it gets me!”
D. You need intermediaries to bring your story to the national public
14. That must be the reaction of your ultimate audience: the national
public. Only that public, informed about, and outraged
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_out_of_court_inform_outrage_strategy.pdf>
at, judges' unaccountability and riskless abuse of power, can force the
reform not only of the Supreme Court, but also the lower federal court and
even the state courts. Your story alone will not attain that objective, but
it must contribute to attaining it.
15. To tell your story to the national public you need the Biden
Commission as well as journalists and universities to become interested in
it and let you use their means for publicizing it.
16. So, it is shortsighted and counterproductive to disparage the media.
They are not your enemies. They are your loudspeakers. They do not form a
monolithic entity. There are thousands of media outlets and tens of
thousands of journalists. Not all of them have the same point of view,
means, or standing:
*a. The New York Times* and *The Washington Post* do not behave the same
way as a new outfit with a handful of journalists trying to breakthrough in
the world of digital investigations.
17. Yet, they share a common interest: their commercial and reputational
advancement. In addition, they can pick and choose among the scores of
millions of people who have been abused by judges. You need journalists
more than they need you. Treat all of them with respect. That is required
by ethical considerations, professional standards, and strategic thinking.
E. Advice on story writing tested and applied successfully
18. I have applied the advice given here to produce my three-volume study
of judges and their judiciaries. The study rests on professional law
research and writing, and strategic thinking. It is titled and downloadable
thus:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability and abuse reporting**
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf>*
*†
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf>*
♣
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
♣ Volume 3: http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3
/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf>
>from
OL3:1144. This article
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf>
is at OL3:1329.
19. This article is also posted to my website *Judicial Discipline Reform*
at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/>. It and similar ones have
attracted so many webvisitors and the latter have reacted to them so
positively that *39,040+* have become subscribers to it as of July 7,
2021(Appendix 3
<http://judicial-discipline-reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf>
).
20. How many law firms, never mind lawyers, do you know who have a website
with so many subscribers?
21. You can join the subscribers thus: go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
<http://www.judicial-discipline-reform.org/> <left panel ↓Register or +
New or Users >Add New.
F. The two-phase writing method
1. In phase one, use your unrestrained creative spirit to draft your story
22. In the end you want to produce a story that flows smoothly into your
audience’s mind and that is accurate, significant, and verifiable. But at
the beginning, there is the big bang of story creation: The story bursts
out of your mind chaotically onto a computer page (or paper). Anything
makes its way out. Nothing is subjected to critical thought controls. If it
pops up, jot it down.
23. Sit at your computer and write on a word processing page whatever
word, term, or phrase identifies a person, event, place, document, thing,
idea, concept, etc., apparently associated with your story. They are your
story’s informational *dots*. Each opens a crack in your mind and lets
other escape.
24. You are not yet trying to write grammatically correct and complete
sentences. You only want to get started telling your story. Blurt anything
and everything onto the page.
25. Let your stream of consciousness bubble out unrestrained by your
thinking mind so that it sprinkles *dots* of your story all over the
page. As related words, terms, and phrases flow out of your mind, keep
adding them to or between the other dots on the page.
26. Widen and multiply the cracks in your mind by asking yourself about
your story *the journalists’ W-questions*: *What!?* Who? Where? When?
How? Why? What now?
27. Keep asking of every word, term, phrase, and sentence concerning an
event: “*then what* happened?...and *then what* did they say?...and *then
what* did I do?...and *then*
--
Life in one word--LOVE
