The ultimate responsibility (for one's own remedies) rests within
ourselves to do our own due diligence and
research/homework/field-testing/etc., anyway. Sure, the /so-called/
«gurus» can give us some ideas as to what to look at, but, in the end,
you should never /blindly follow/ what anyone else says/claims (and
/anybody/ who /claims/ to «know everything» is /automatically/ leading
their «followers» down a dangerous «cult-style» path of
«dogmatic-followership»). The guru still cannot «do your push-ups»
/for/ you in order for /your/ «muscles» to /get stronger/
(metaphorically).
/Some/ «remedies» do seem to be more consistent than others. Amongst
the /more consistent/ ones seem to be the following...:
➤ Pre-emptive ESTOPPEL Notices
➤ Asking /them/ questions that are «self-incriminating» if/when
you are confronted /without cause*
/➤ Printed NOTICES (warnings) that you can put on your front door,
car-window, covering the VIN-plate, etc.
➤ /Compelling letters/ that demonstrate /your/
«intellectual-superiority» over /them/ (this is a /much more/
«advanced» way of handling things which takes /far more effort/ than
some of the /quicker/ «remedies» listed above as this particular
method requires a great deal of knowledge about psychology, the
sciences, etc., and your ability to quote-reference from /several/
«scientific» publications, even to the point of providing the specific
ISBNs so that there can be NO DOUBT as to the «legitimacy» of the
information where they /cannot/ «claim» that you were just «making
stuff up» [most of them are «idiots» anyway who have never read more
than one non-fiction book in their whole entire lives if /any/]).
Ultimately, you are still dealing with what is essentially a
«psychological chess-game» (metaphorically speaking), when interacting
with /any/ part of the «courts» related legalese-system (whether it be
the cops out on the streets trying to extort every penny out of you
before you can even earn a penny or the liars in the court-houses or
otherwise).
On 2021-05-18 3:28 p.m., J_B wrote:
yes beware of ana.. shes hit or miss on her things but then again could be people not knowing how to apply what she says in combination with crooked judge hat wont follow it and therefore gives the image of false information
you want to be a state citizen
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:25 PM Joe Skelton <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This sounds like some more of Anna's BS
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021, 02:49:21 PM CDT, The Moab
<g2themoab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All born in the United States are initially Nationals. It does
pertain them, please research passport legal help for American
National.
by : Hernandez-Jr: Gregorio
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED without Prejudice Confidentiality Notice: This
private electronic correspondence, including any/all attachment(s)
are limited for the sole use of the intended recipient and may
contain Privileged and/or Confidential Information. �
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT. NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE
TO PRINCIPAL. Information in this or any following correspondence
is not to be construed as legal advice. [Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, 18 USC §§ 2510 et seq]
On Tue, May 18, 2021, 1:18 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
this refers to a "national of the US" Not a State Citizen of a
State of the Union. So how does it apply to my Citizenship? A
State Citizen born on the soil of Oklahoma?
On Sunday, May 16, 2021, 2:24:53 PM CDT, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/878
Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
