COVID-19 is word art and is a fiction in commerce. There is no such thing as a
virus or bacterium that is contagious and causes disease. That is the germ
theory hoax.
https://yummy.doctor/video-list/the-untold-truth-about-the-medical-system-discussion-with-adv-how-to-detox-and-more/?fbclid=IwAR0-d9gYcFMa3h86-bQjrYhzB-KDvosJij8jbvC8MXVsmqlfNH7B3GNUykY
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 10:09:26 p.m. PDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When Colorado tells that all that get the shot by some date and they will
randomly pick out five for a million dollars each and then tell you come Sept
they will knock on doors.
COUNT ME OUT!! NO VAX. Hear that ivermectin will cure and one can get a
prescription on line in a push way. Some countries have chosen this from the
outset and over the non-sense. True?
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 10:51 PM Michael Glavic <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Should COVID-19 vaccines be mandatory? Experts argue such measures aren’t
always effective
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Should COVID-19 vaccines be mandatory? Experts argue such measures aren’...
Introduction of mandatory vaccine policies is not always justified or
effective, some experts argue
|
|
|
To someone (sarcastically?) saying if not acknowledging they couldn't have put
it better, (what I said earlier to this thread, at the Globe) themselves, if
not to my saying, "no," or thinking they understand "justice" or how to serve
it better than I, in such regard.. .
Well, if we can assume making vaccination mandatory is OK, or even legitimately
for us to decide and act upon as enforce, (however, but by limitations to
choices and/or abusive means coming to mind, where we aren't even primarily
about testing for who has what, and should be identified and treated in such
regard) I suppose I may as well assume we're all up to challenging the law
(etc.) as for actually being for justice in such respect, whatever else should
matter.
Bullying people to a consensus is not the way to serving justice, (like with
Jury Duty, if not politics, what justice there is in expecting people to do so,
otherwise, relative to those who directly if not more actually "profit" from as
much...) where providing the evidence if not more evidence (if not such
evidence) surely is..
Consider that, my saying So... as from a more logical or reasonable perspective
(of orientation, as to example) and not so much from a politically correct or
legal (law based, not so much of practice.. .) perspective, to what ails us if
not actually rectifies the matter, of our abusiveness/unreasonableness, if not
merely, otherwise, wink, wink?
We shouldn't have to do anything, otherwise.. .
Michael Glavic
So true Champion of Justice, Etc..
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 01:43:46 p.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Received.
I'd recommend declining to serve on "Jury Duty," (say, as a conscientious
objector, or whatever, of your true sovereignty, [and duty] otherwise, if not
So true, coming to mind of actually being something if not something So if not
even more, meaningful.. Hey, let's actually be "Evidenced based," shall we, or
screw your law, style and/or method, otherwise) or, further to as much,
castigating the legal system wherever and however you can, otherwise, even
before, when you think (how you do?) you're called to do So, or probably get if
not still get what you "deserve," how I do, yeah, for Justice Reform, if not
Constitutional (or national).) reform, what sick if not meaningless
(Disordered) nation I find we have if not are, otherwise. No "hot shot" of
politics, and complicit law... but what is "So real and just," and getting
things where they are cognitively if not intelligently going, Am I.. .
Indeed, the pervasiveness of darkness and evil to/of our political and legal
system and development(s), to serving "Justice," if not God, if not Everything
meaningful... runs deep if not overwhelming to most, to which I understand I
help with and give example to what can only be, of such, light, of truth,
whether you think our minds are being censored if not worse, or not (Like,
where have you seem as much before) I Go So faithfully and factually, Etc.,
like as much or not
Michael Glavic
Champion of as much
Or what. Screw with my internet, etc?. (I get that, easily covered up as of
something less.. .) Like someone thinks they're getting the real deal, or the
better of me... with screwing around by knowing what I if not WE think and do
in such respect. "They don't," (but by their filthy and game, which I intend to
prosecute or cleanse in such regard) I'm So sure, and helping where and how I
can if not, best in such respect. Hey, where you thought I went away? .. . Not
yet, if ever.. . I Go with as much, "Hopefully," (So hopefully) even better
with time.. . I Feel I have "time" on my side in such respect, and Go,
accordingly, whatever else should come along or, logically/reasonably does.. .
See my faith and facts (if not The facts, that should matter) shining in such
respect. I Do.. .
On "Shining," For Justice. I appreciate your work and contributions in such
regard
BWE On Wednesday, July 7, 2021, 10:41:50 p.m. EDT, cordero
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of thisemail.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media as widely
as possible in your owninterest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g.,
click “Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register or +New
or Users >Add New.
The article belowhad a consistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received,they crept in during transit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlook them.
Writing your story of abuse by judges and guardians in up to 500 words by
applying the two-phase method; and using it fordemanding that the Biden
Commission on Supreme Court reformhear your testimony at its “public meetings”;
andasking universities and the media,such as the news agencies Reuters, The
Boston Globe,
Propublica, and The Washington Post,to let the national public hear you by
holding the proposedunprecedented citizens hearings
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_method_for_writing_your_story.pdf
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D., University ofCambridge, EnglandM.B.A.,
University of Michigan Business SchoolD.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial
Discipline ReformNew York
Cityhttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
A. Telling your story at the most opportune time: when peoplewant to hear it
1. This article lays out a two-phase methodfor you to write in up to 500 words
the story of the abuse of power by judgesthat you have suffered or witnessed.
2. Your effort in writing your story willpay off, for you will be doing so at
the most opportune time: when the public,journalists, universities, and even
many politicians want to hear about thosestories in the context of what will
soon dominate the national debate: theCommission nominated by President Biden
on April 9, 2021, to study waysof reforming the Supreme Court; and the
desireattributed to him and his party “to pack the Supreme Court”, that is,
toincrease the number of justices from 9 to 15 and reduce their
life-appointmentto a term of years.
B. Composing an informative and brief story to be read, heard,and investigated
3. You want to tell the national public yourstory of judges’ abuse of power and
make the public share your outrage at it.You also want your story to be
investigated by journalists.
4. But nobody is going to read the scores,never mind hundreds, of pages
generated by your case in court to figure outwhat your story is all about.
5. Moreover, at a hearing you will haveonly 5 minutes to tell your story...a
rambling account will not hold theattention of the audience even that long.
6. In addition, journalists will not investigatea story that is confusing and
missing key pieces of information so that itfails to pique their curiosity and
makes them feel that it would not interesttheir own audience. Therefore, you
will benefit from applyingthe method set forth below for writing an informative
and brief story. You willuse it to rehearse your oral delivery of it at a
hearing.
C. Not a professionally written story, but written afterdoing one’s homework
7. Research your own documents and citethem so that your story is accurate and
verifiable.
8. Write a story that is significant to theaudience: You are not writing a
diary for your private reading. You are writinga story to be read by others,
your audience. Organize it chronologically sothat it can be easily followed by
people who are totally unfamiliar with youand it.
9. Highlight the most outrageous events andavoid getting bogged down in details
unimportant to the story even if they areimportant to you. After reading it,
your audience should be able to exclaim:‘The judge in this story did A, B, and
C. How outrageous!”
10. Edit your writing to make it asgrammatically correct as you can so that the
audience’s attention isconcentrated on your story without grammatical mistakes
distracting it and reflectingpoorly on your degree of education and attention
to detail.
11. Your objectives are clear: Youraccurate and verifiable story earns you the
respect and trust of your audience.Its significance to them earns you their
gratitude. All this may makes you attainyour most important objective: your
audience’s action in support of your cause.
12. Your audience’s support will be morelikely and stronger if you apply to the
writing of your story a principle ofstrategic thinking: “People never listen so
attentively and react so positivelyas when they listen to avoid harm to
themselves and their loved ones.”
13. Make your audience feel that the abuseby judges that you suffered or
witnessed can happen to them too. They can fallprey to the abusers. “No! That
isunacceptable. That is outrageous! I must support this victim to end this
abusebefore it gets me!”
D. You need intermediaries to bring your story to thenational public
14. That must be the reaction of yourultimate audience: the national public.
Only that public, informed about, andoutraged at, judges' unaccountability
andriskless abuse of power, can force the reform not only of the Supreme
Court,but also the lower federal court and even the state courts. Your story
alonewill not attain that objective, but it must contribute to attaining it.
15. To tell your story to the nationalpublic you need the Biden Commission as
well as journalists and universities tobecome interested in it and let you use
their means for publicizing it.
16. So, it is shortsighted andcounterproductive to disparage the media. They
are not your enemies. They areyour loudspeakers. They do not form a monolithic
entity. There are thousands ofmedia outlets and tens of thousands of
journalists. Not all of them have thesame point of view, means, or standing:
a. The New York Timesand The Washington Post do not behavethe same way as a new
outfit with a handful of journalists trying tobreakthrough in the world of
digital investigations.
17. Yet, they share a common interest: theircommercial and reputational
advancement. In addition, they can pick and chooseamong the scores of millions
of people who have been abused by judges. You needjournalists more than they
need you. Treat all of them with respect. That isrequired by ethical
considerations, professional standards, and strategicthinking.
E. Advice on story writing tested and applied successfully
18. I have applied the advice given here to producemy three-volume study of
judges and their judiciaries. The study rests onprofessional law research and
writing, and strategic thinking. It is titled anddownloadable thus:
ExposingJudges' Unaccountability and Consequent Riskless Abuse of
Power:Pioneeringthe news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability and
abuse reporting* † ♣
♣ Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf ;
from OL3:1144. This article is at OL3:1329.