[administrating-your-public-servants] Re: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: [administrating-your-public-servants] A pitch to those in court, the media, lawyers, and academics, of a series of webinars and articles on exposing judges’ unaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power
- From: "Don Mashak" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "donmashak" for DMARC)
- To: "administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:54:52 +0000 (UTC)
CHAOS & TURMOIL – AN OVERVIEW OF HOW AMERICA & THE WORLD GOT HERE & CAOS y
CONFUSIÓN: UNA VISIÓN GENERAL DE CÓMO LLEGARON AQUÍ AMÉRICA Y EL MUNDO
https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2021/03/12/chaos-turmoil-an-overview-of-how-america-the-world-got-here-caos-y-confusion-una-vision-general-de-como-llegaron-aqui-america-y-el-mundo/
CHAOS & TURMOIL – AN OVERVIEW OF HOW AMERICA & THE WORLD GOT HERE & CAOS y
CONFUSIÓN: UNA VISIÓN GENERAL DE CÓMO LLEGARON AQUÍ AMÉRICA Y EL MUNDO
https://donmashakshennepincountymnfreepressnews.wordpress.com/2021/03/12/chaos-turmoil-an-overview-of-how-america-the-world-got-here-caos-y-confusion-una-vision-general-de-como-llegaron-aqui-america-y-el-mundo/
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Thursday, February 11, 2021, 9:30:06 PM CST, Don Mashak
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
PDF attached
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
Rt 1 Box 231
Albertville MN 55301
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended only
for the use of the person or entity named above and is privileged and
confidential. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
other than to the person or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
by phone and by replying to this message and then delete the message and any
attachments from your system.
On Thursday, February 11, 2021, 2:51:06 PM CST, cordero
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTE: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt ofthis email
You areencouraged to share and post it to social media as widely as
possible in yourown interest and that of the rest of We the People; e.g., click
"Reply All".
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users > Add New . Pitching aseries of webinars and articles on
exposing judges’ unaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power;
representing abusees’ collective demand for compensation;
promoting unprecedented citizens hearings held by the media and universities;
and
making history through transformational change that
enables the holding of judicial public servants accountable and liable by
the Masters of all public servants: Wethe People
The foundation for amultidisciplinary academic and business joint
venturehttp://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-CLEs_lawyers_media.pdf
By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
,CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx Dear media officers, journalists, lawyers, academics,
those in court, and Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, 1. This is a pitch for a
series of webinars andarticles that can benefit you materially and
reputationally. A. Contents and purpose of the webinars and articles 2. The
webinars and articles aim to: a. expose to the national public judges’
unaccountability and consequentriskless abuse of power. They do not deal with
the exercise of judicial powerwithin a wide margin of discretion, which judges
invoke as an easy excuse fortheir complained-about conduct. Rather, their
originality lies in their focuson judges’ criminal and unethical conduct for
their personal and judicial classgain and convenience. Such conduct must be as
punishable when judges engage init as when anybody else does. That is required
by the tenet of “Equal Justice Under Law” and their oath of office to “do equal
right to the poor [in ties to them] and to therich[in power to reciprocate
their holding a fellow judge unaccountable]” (28 USC §453 = Title 28 of theU.S.
Code of federal law, section 453); b. help lawyers organize abusees in
localchapters and represent them in their collective demand for compensation
from the same abusivejudge before whom, or the same abuse-condoningcourt in
which, abusees have appeared. This can become a profitable nichepractice, for
many people would sign up to such a demand if well publicized andguided by
lawyers; c. promote unprecedented citizens hearings organized by themedia and
universities where victims of, and witnesses to, judges’ abuse willtestify
before journalists, academics, and multidisciplinary experts via
videoconference accessible to a national and international audience. These
hearingswill pioneer others on other subjects by self-assertive citizens; d.
set off transformative change: the system of justice that comes out of the
changeis different from the one that went in. Beginning here and extending
abroad, itcan for the first time in historycause judicial public servants to be
held accountable and liable to theirabusees by the Masters of all public
servants in “government of, by, and for the people”: We the People. 3. The
webinarsand articles will lay the foundation for a jointmultidisciplinary
academic and business venture. Its basis is the successfulwebsite of Judicial
Discipline Reform at http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. It has ;
attracted with my articles posted there so many webvisitors that 37,225+ have
become subscribers(Appendix 3). How many law firms,let alone lawyers, do you
know have a website with so many subscribers? 4. The joint venture will develop
the site froma free informational platform into: a. a clearinghouse for
complaints against judgesuploaded by anybody; b. a research center for
fee-paying clients auditing judges’decisions and searching many other writings
from many sources to apply to them computer-assistedstatistical, linguistic,
and literary analysis. All those writings can revealthe most persuasive type of
evidence: judges’ patterns, trends, and schemes of“bad Behaviour” (U.S.
Constitution, Article III,Section 1), which constitutes one of the grounds for
removing judges fromoffice; and c. the digital portal of the joint venture and
the precursor to the institute of judicialunaccountability reporting and reform
advocacy, to be attached to a topuniversity or established by a consortium of
media outlets. Both the ventureand the institute are described in my business
plan, which is guidedby the motto: Making Money While Doing Justice. 5. The
audience for the webminarsand the articles is large just as there is a large
market for the jointventure: a. We live in a litigious society. More than
50million cases are filed annually in the state and federal courts, towhich
must be added the scores of millions of cases that are pending or deemedto have
been decided wrongly or wrongfully. b. Indeed, judges’ power is enormous: One
districtjudge suspended nationwide an executiveorder, e.g., the Muslim travel
ban, issued by a president elected by 62.5+million voters, and three circuit
judges upheld the suspension nation-wide. c. What can judges not do to you, a
lawyer, never minda pro se? Judges’ opportunity for abuse has increased as the
Covid pandemia hasenlarged the number of cases of bankruptcy; insurance
coverage; landlord-tenantdisputes and evictions; socio-economic and health
access inequality; etc. 6. By the very nature of a case incourt, 50% of the
parties to those cases are disappointed because they lost andthe other 50% may
also be to some degree disappointed because they were notgranted all the relief
that they had requested from the court. 7. Hence the huge size of The
Dissatified with The Judicial and Legal System. They are determined to
pursuetheir quest for justice, for nothing outrages people and inflames
theirpassions more than the feeling that they have been abused and had their
rightstrampled upon. The Dissatisfiedconstitute the broader audience of the
webinars and articles, and the targetmarket of the multidisciplinary academic
and business joint venture. 8. The size and growth potential ofthat audience
and market will help people drop the objection that‘we only sell X goods and
services ‘cause we ain’t do no legal activism stuff’. If Jeff Bezos of Amazon
had taken that attitude, he would never havestepped out of selling books from a
garage to sell books in a different way;invent a new business model to sell
everything through an imaginative way ofusing what at the time was the new
communications vehicle of the Internet; andbecome a global economic and
political powerhouse that can challenge any actualor potential competitor and
even governments. Mr. Bezos and Amazon detected abusiness opportunity and
seized it. 9. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. The webinars and articleswill provide the
knowledge that will enable you and your entity to seize theopportunity to
become your own version of Bezos and Amazon.
B. Exhibits of my qualifications for holding webinars &having articles
published 10. To ascertain my qualifications for holdingthe webinars and
writing articles for publication: a. watch my video and follow it onits slides;
b. read in my three-volume study* † ♣ of judges and their judiciaries, which
is theproduct of professional law research and writing, and strategic thinking.
It is uniquelybased on the analysis of the official statistics and reports of
the U.S. courts, collected by the AdministrativeOffice of the U.S. Courts (AO),
and submitted to Congressin the Annual Report of the AODirector, who is
appointed by the Chief Justice (28 USC §601). The study istitled and
downloadable thus: Exposing Judges' Unaccountability
and Consequent Riskless Abuse ofPower:
Pioneering thenews and publishing field of
judicialunaccountability and abuse reporting* † ♣ * Volume 1:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf † ;
Volume 2:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates2.pdf
♣ Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf
i. Open the downloaded files using Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available for
free. c. visit the website of Judicial Discipline Reform: 1) You can
subscribe for free to its articles, suchas this one, by goingto its homepage
<left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add New. 2) Many articles
are downloadable as individual files through theirlinks on a list. The latter
includesa sample of subjects on which I can write articles on commission. 3)
The study and the articles are formatted as if theywere briefs. The articles
are written in the long form published by lawjournals or the likes of The New
YorkTimes Sunday magazine supplement, TheNew Yorker, The Atlantic, TIME,etc.
These characteristics support the reasonable conclusion that my
websitesubscribers are above-average educated and affluent. They constitute
theinitial market base of the proposed multidisciplinary academic and
businessjoint venture. C. Optimal time for exposing judges’ unaccountability
and abuseof power 11. President Joe Biden can anytimeform the commission to
reform the judicial system that he announced in aninterview with CBS newsanchor
Norah O’Donnell on October 22, 2020. 12. PresidentBiden nominated as attorney
general Judge Merrick Garland ofthe Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit (CADCC) and theSenate is getting ready to hold hearings
thereon. a. Judge Garland was CADCC chief judge and member ofthe circuit
council. As such, he dismissed 100% of the 476 complaints filed there
againsthis peers and colleagues, and denied 100% of the petitions for review
ofsuch dismissals during the 11-year 1oct06-30sep17 period. Since he began to
serve on that Court in 1997, he has kept silent about such abuse of people’s
right under the Judicial Conduct andDisability Act (the Act) (28 USC §§351-364)
to complain against judges despite his legal and ethical duty to report it to
safeguard the integrity of the judiciary (18 USC §3057; Code of Conduct for
U.S. Judges, Canon 3(B)(6)). b. Therefore, if Judge Garland is confirmed
asattorney general, never mind if he becomes directly or indirectly a member
ofPresident Biden’s commission to reform the judicial system, he will cover up
thatabusive dismissal of complaints and denial of review petitions. c. Worse
yet,he will hinder any investigation into judges’ conduct underlying the
thecomplaints. Such conduct may include “Treason, Bribery, or other high
Crimesand Misdemeanors” (U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 4), which can
lead tojudges’ impeachment and removal from office. d. He mustcover up the
abusive handling of complaints and hinder their investigation bythe commission;
another official entity, such as the Department of Justice, theFBI, or the
Office of Professional Responsibility; and the media, lest he be incriminated
as principal oraccessory to abuse, not only by the investigators, but also by a
morethreatening authority, to wit, his own fellow judges, all of whom
stridentlyscream at him, ‘If you let them bring us down, we’ll take you with
us!’ 13. Federal judges have abrogated in effect theAct, showing contemptuous
disregard for Congress and the Executive. They havecontinued their self-insured
unaccountability as it existed before the passageof the Act in 1980. a. In the
232 years since the creation of the FederalJudiciary in 1789, the number of
federal judicial officers impeached andremoved is 8! Those officersinclude
Article III judges, i.e., justices and circuit and district judges, andtheir
appointees, that is, bankruptcy judges and magistrates. b. All of them -2,340
as ofSeptember 30, 2019- are in practice unimpeachable and irremovable: Judges
Abovethe Law of a State within astate. 14. Can you reasonably expect themto
have any regard for what you write in your briefs or argue in court, letalone
when people appear unrepresented, that is, pro se, and are treated byjudges as
“trash”? 15. Your words are as dead as theAct is toothless, for politicians
lack the courage to hold ‘our men and women on the bench’ accountable, never
mind liable to compensation. Theyhave shown reckless disregard for the harm to
the integrity of judicial process, democratic government bythe rule of law, and
We the People. 16. Compare reality with Sen. DeConcini’slip service statement:
“Aspart of a vigorous oversight responsibility, I plan to monitor
implementationof the [] Act. I particularly expect to examine the way in which
specificsanctions are imposed, as well as the method of appellate review of
judicial councildecisions, in order to see if statutory or other perfecting
changes arenecessary in the future”; Congressional Record – Senate,September
30, 1980, p. 28090. 17. Sen. DeConcini and the rest ofCongress have perfected
nothing and condoned the absence of any appellatereview. 18. In fact, the
statistics of thefederal courts of appeals show that 93% of
appeals(>OL2:457§§D, B) to the circuit courts are disposed of in decisions that
are “procedural [mostly the catchall pretext of “lack of jurisdiction”],
unsigned, unpublished, without comment, and byconsolidation”. 19. This means
that in 93% ofappeals what you receive is an unresearched, unreasoned,
unprecedential, adhoc, arbitrary fiat of a star chamber, contained in a 5¢
dumping form rubberstampedby a clerk. Just check those posted to their
websites. 20. Statistically, it is wishfulthinking for you to expect to be in
the unequally treated 7% of parties whoseappeals are decided in opinions signed
by judges and included in a reporter (a serial publication of a set ofbooks
containing judicial decisions). 21.All this points to the implications of the
comments that U.S. JudgeRobert Pratt of the Southern District of Iowa made in
an interview withAssociated Press reporter Ryan Foley, who published his
article “U.S. judge ridicules Trump's pardons", published on December 30, 2020.
a. Judges’ dismissal of 100% of complaints against themand denial of 100% of
review petitions are preemptive reciprocal pardons. b. The latter are more
harmful to the judicial systemthan the president’s pardons, for their
dismissals and denials take place atthe outset and out of hand, without the
benefit of any investigation,disclosure and discovery of evidence, presentation
in open court, and public debate. c. They are pardons issued with contempt for
judicialprocess, with a self-interest motive, and as means of bribing and
extorting: ‘Today I pardon you and tomorrow you pardon me or my friends if we
arethe target of a complaint...or else!’ d. Pardoned judges are granted a
retroactive license to keepabusing their power. So are their peers and
colleagues. Complainants and therest of the public are left uncompensated and
at the mercy of reciprocally-protectingjudges.
D. A sample of subjects of the series of webinars and articles 22. Judges cause
injury in fact to the people whosemoney they grab and the participants in
judicial process, whose effort, time,and money spent on discovery, briefs,
court and attorney’s fees, etc., theyrender wasteful, and whose reasonable
expectation of justice they foreseeably,and thus intentionally frustrate. 23.
That is the basis for holding them liable to compensate yourclients and you.
This is possible even if you have never filed a complaintagainst any of them.
Their abuse is so pervasive, grave, and coordinated that ithas become their
institutionalized modusoperandi. It corrupts judicial process and harms even
those who do not know it. 24. The following forms of abuse are discussedin
articles available for review before publication and presentable in webinars:
a. judges’ abusive enrichment denounced by Sen. Elizabeth Warren b. judges’
bankruptcy fraud scheme c. judges’ fraudulent filing and approval of mandatory
annual financial disclosure reports d. judges’ interception of people’s
emailand mail to detect and suppress those of their critics e. judges’ failure
to read the overwhelmingmajority of briefs f. judges’ and conniving
congressional politicians’ sham hearings on judicialconduct g. debunking the
self-serving doctrine of judicial immunity concocted by judges h. setting in
motion ageneralized media investigation of judges’ abuse i. investigating
justices and demanding the release of the FBI’s secret judicial vettingreports
j. a method for people to write in up to 500 words their story ofabuse by
judges k. organizing and holding unprecedented citizens hearings on judges’
abuse l. forming the coalition of talkshow hosts for justice m. adapting to the
new legal market resulting from Covid19 n. making the documentary Black Robed
Predators:when judges are the abusers o. research proposals for the joint
venture and the institute of judicial unaccountability reporting
E. Requested action 25. Individually, you and I are nothing buta petit nuisance
to judges and their conniving protectors. But if we joinforces and think
strategically,we can start that for which there is repeatable precedent: a Tea
Party/MeToo!/BLM-like global civic apolitical movement for judicial abuse
ofpower exposure, collective compensation of abusees, and reform
throughtransformative change. 26. People informed about, and outraged
at,judges’ abuse can impose their demand for change as they join the
precedentialmovements in shouting the rallying cry so expressive of their
common mood: Enough isenough!
We won’t take any abuse by anybody anymore. 27. Theycan force the holding of
the constitutional convention that since April 2,2014, 34 states have
petitioned Congress to call, which satisfies the amendingprovisions of Article
V of the Constitution. Just as the delegates convened to amend the Articles
ofConfederation set them aside and wrote a totally new constitution, that
of1789, a runaway convention can do what is anathema to political leaders:
write anew constitution enabling We the People to hold all publicservants
accountable and liable. 28. Byagreeing to the proposed series of webinars and
articles you can make yourselfthis generation’s equivalentof Washington Post
publisherKatharine Graham and editor Benjamin Bradlee of Watergate fame. They
supported the exposure of PresidentNixon and his aides as “a criminal
enterprise”, as described by their reporters Carl Bernstein and BobWoodward,
and brought them down, which sent “All thePresident’s Men” tojail and forced
Nixon to resign on August 8, 1974. 29. By contrast,you can bring down a whole
branch of government that operates as a racketeering enterprise. You can do so
profitably because “Scandal sells”. It can lead to aflood of specialized
consulting and lobbying work; compensation claims; motionsto vacate and remand
for a new trial; a bestseller and ablockbuster movie (cf. the link in the above
paragraph); and a Pulitzer Prizefor “Pioneering the news and publishing field
ofjudicial unaccountability and abuse reporting”. 30. Therefore, I
respectfully request thatyou get in touch with me to discuss this proposal,
using my contact informationin the letterhead or below. To take advantage of
this optimal time for exposingjudges’ unaccountability and consequent riskless
abuse of power we must proceedwith due haste. F. My offer to present this
proposal; and your sharing andposting it 31. In that vein, I offer to make
apresentation of this proposal to you and your guests followed by a Q&Asession.
The presentation can take place on short notice via video conferenceor, if here
in New York City, in person. 32. To decide whether to organizethe presentation
you may watch my video and follow it on its slides. 33. To consult with others
on this proposaland/or interest potential guests in attending the presentation
you may widelyshare this article and post it to social media, such as:
Facebook, Youtube, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Instagram,Google plus, Pinterest,
Reddit, Snapchat
Twitter: Pitching a series of webinars & articles on exposing
judges’unaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power &
amultidisciplinary academic-business joint venture to make money while
doingjustice
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero-CLEs_lawyers_media.pdf
G. Every meaningful cause needs resources for itsadvancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money Putyour money
where your outrage at abuse and
passion for justice are. DONATE
to
Judicial Discipline Reform through Paypal
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ
by making a deposit or anonline transfer to
Citi Bank, routing no. 021 000 089, account 4977 59 2001 or by mailing a check
to theaddress below. I look forward to hearing from you. Dare trigger
history!...and you mayenter it. Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, NY 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b NOTE: Given the ;
interference with Dr. Cordero’s emailand e-cloud storage accounts described at
*>ggl:1 et seq. and †>OL2:1114§G, when emailing him, copy theabove bloc of his
email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email soas to enhance the
chances of your email reaching him at least at one of
thoseaddresses.************************************
Other related posts:
- » [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: [administrating-your-public-servants] A pitch to those in court, the media, lawyers, and academics, of a series of webinars and articles on exposing judgesâ unaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power - Don Mashak
