Thank you Charley.
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:21 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As a libertarian I do not believe in copyrights. So use, publish, pass
along as one wishes. Let the best wo/man win or perfect.
I'll post a couple of different ways I know works and one can choose.
Your name, am a United States of America National
Not United States Citizen (might be able to leave this off)
Article 1, section 8, clause 17
Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
Attach to document
Most complicated
The Constitution of the United States of America
Article 1, section 8, clause 17
Your name is a American National
Not an United States Citizen
Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
Sign it and can sign under penalties and perjuty.
Trying or experimenting with this. A small card or just paper to give
officer with only first and middle name on card or paper.
The first statement above and adding. "Matters will be settled in United
States court of Federal Claims for violating my liberties".
See how Officers react to that. Hoping it would work as a drivers license
or in other situations of ID. Probably laminated etc to look more official?
If it works.
Loving and striving for life, liberty and property. I promised to defend
as a private member of the articles of confederation that I encourage
others to join.
Also wondering and trying to find out:
When sending and clarifying jurisdiction on the ticket if one can send the
bill at same time and get there membership court to honor it. Hope to find
out soon.
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 12:46 AM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Charley, if at all possible, could you attach that short 1;8;17 rebuttalLife in one word--LOVE
you posted to the group, I think it was yesterday. I thought I had it but
I can't find it now and I love the way you had put it all so succinctly. I
would like to save it for future reference. Thank you in advance Charley.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 5:43 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The thugs give citation with a court date. Immediately make a copy and--
put/ blank piece of paper. The article 1817 statement and to dismiss the
case. That stops the judge from doing anything further with the complaint.
One could stop there and wait for next move. Or if one is more aggressive.
immediately send to the United States federal claims court with a statement
that I've posted here from David Lester straight to be reimbursed for
damages. The federal court is the United States and not the United States
of America Corp. That your dealing with. That court will take care of who
gets to pay and crimes. Just file what happened and swear under oath.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 6:14 PM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Thanks Charley. Good stuff.Life in one word--LOVE
Only one question. You can post your business as you suggest and the
thugs still come in and start acting like they own the place. Are you
saying don't waste your time responding to some corporate agent health
looser fines and other acts of trespass, just put in a claim to the United
States Court of Claims? Please clarify.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:57 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In Colorado some politician's have told their favorite business to--
just say your a private business. So others jumped on. Some learnt from
our
smoke dope emporiums. It all comes back to the constitution.
Article1;8;17 makes it clear the government authority is only land
they own. No where else in the constitution does it ever mention"We the
People" surrendered anything in relation to our relationship to each other
and the government controls it.
Article 6 says previous agreements are honored. The Articles of
confederation is one of those documents. That document created United
States of America a country and the PMA or common law trust agreement that
states that the free citizen and inhabitant members will agree. To this
in
order to belong. Otherwise your not a member. Read the terms in that
agreement, Northwest Ordinance and Declaration of Independance included.
The great rule for business there is members promise to file claims with
the other member and they both agree a jury of members will decide. Not
the
private government courts. One could hire a common law arbitration panel
to
do this or an assembly if they are professional enough.
That is why the statement I tell people to use for traffic tickets
should be posted on their business door.Add to it that we are a private
business and government does not oversee our operating procedures.
All government agents send notice to this address and welcomed to do
only private business here.
Out of courtesy one could send that same notice to the nearest
policing agent.
This sign is a warning sign and if an agent comes in and starts
walking as if he owns the place. The owner needs to tell him to leave and
if one does not. Send a claim to the United States Court of federal
claims.
That will be financial trespass recovery. It is their duty to apply
criminal charges as they see fit. That is how you tell them to pound salt.
Go another step and tell them to take their taxes and shove it. Or an
agreement you will pay this percentage. Because they say you volunteer.
It's like a church everyone pays as they see fit and all get the same
services. At least till rules change.
Now for Minnesota. I've got no clue unless your talking about the one
that hired that group and I'll say. Good luck because there approach I
have
no clue except to say. They are not in the private of the articles of
confederation. They are fighting in the legislative law. Need to send
damages to the United States Court of federal claims.
I know, I know, saying this makes everyone say. "No way charley. I've
been fighting and tried it," and I'll tell you to look closer to what I'm
doing. It works. For the restaurant in Minnesota. If she calls me. I'll
take a percentage but it will end and she will tell them to go pound salt.
She can recover all damages if she has documented them.
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 8:52 AM Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Charley, when you say ma and pa became private businesses, how didLife in one word--LOVE
they do that? How do they tell the government lackeys that they have no
authority over a private business? Isn't there some lady in Minnesota
that
is suing the phony corporate STATE OF MINNESOTA on this very issue. How
are the other mom and pop businesses going private w/out all the court
battles? If businesses can learn how to do this they can tell the
corporate governments to pound salt. Can you give us a view of how this
is
done?
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:47 AM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Convention of states is the worst concept to do in these troubled
times and truthfully anytime. When Americans wake up and realize how
they
have twisted and abused the constitution under or watch. Just time to
tell
them no in the courts. Articles of confederation are a common law trust
but
better then the ones formed today. Many clubs have created their own and
government cannot touch them. Period. During the pandemic here many
restraints. Ma and pa became private business and stayed open. Private
business is a form of common law trust. Wake up and realize how powerful
the condition is and just say no
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:36 PM Shining Emperor <
nrcwinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don,Life in one word--LOVE
Your conclusions are correct of Rothschild CFR....influence,
infiltration or blunt 'ownership ' since Rothschild bought Is-ra-el
years
ago. Current Israel jewelry are fake Jews converts, not Israelites
mentioned in the Bible.
On Thu, May 20, 2021, 10:30 Don Mashak <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello
I apologize in advance if this topic does not belong here.
I have reached the conclusion that the current "Convention of
States" Movement is being
funded and run by Rothschild's "Council on Foreign Relations". The
CFR was founded by
Rothschilds frontmen Rockefeller, Warburg and JP Morgan in 1821.
Its agenda includes
achieving the New World Order, One World Government and generally
advancing the
Progressive Globalist Agenda.
While I originally support the Convention of States, I changed my
mind do to the
great involvement of CFR member Pete Hegseth.
[image: Inline image]
Since Rothschilds Progressive Globalist Insurgency is the cause of
our run away
rogue government, logic says their CFRs involvement in the
Convention of States
is an ill omen
Many speak of their concerns of a run away Covention of States
repealing the
entire Constitution, which is what the Progressive Globalists
want..
SO MY QUESTION IS, DO ANY OF YOU HAVE BETTER PROOFS THAN
I OF THE ROTHSCHILD'S CFR'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE "CONVENTION OF
STATES MOVEMENT.
To give some sense of urgency, my understanding is only 38 states
must ratify the
call for a convention of states. And they already have 30 states
that have voted in favor.
[image: Inline image]
I would appreciate your input.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you for your time.
In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
On Wednesday, May 19, 2021, 9:45:13 AM CDT, Charley Dan <
charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
State citizen is a word to avoid. It has to many connotations. I'm
a United States of America national. Yes, one either studies to know
the
ins and outs or you are always at the mercy who will defend you. For
Anna.
issue appears often that she takes others people's words how to do
something without knowing the individual or method proven. So she has
a hit
and miss situation. Eventually she will have it right. Glad to see the
resistant she brings.
Many will not represent you as a lawyer in court proceedings which
is paperwork with their signature on paper. Because they get this
little
notice in the mail that says; you have been reported for practicng law
without registration and they are investigating. Since very, very few
know
how to win in court. They have no answer for this which is always a
jail
sentence if not defended properly for so called practicing law. Which
is
where they should go for saying they know but do not. The nice part
of the
notice is it comes from the state Supreme Court and where it will be
heard. State Supreme Court has Original jurisdiction between a free
State
and State of state situations. All other courts have general
jurisdiction.
What happens in all other courts depends on them. Wither they choose
to
support the state or your position. A risk they will take. Yes, even
risk
going to jail. Here is the position to take from my experience of what
works efficiently and consistently and my approach in a "kis" method.
Or as
simple as one can make it.
The officer on the street approach. Staying cool is the best along
with a printed letter. I'll print as a two part bUT use as one
letter you
should hand officers. Especially if you do not intend to give them
your
name. To officers a name Is very important. Once they get that they
can go
to their computer and have your state and federal history. Personally
my
view of your/officer history of me is changing till you know who I
really
am. If officer loses you in the system. They will spend hours putting
your
profile back together. The best I can tell is most of this
information is
not shared across state lines. If one gets a national passport;. That
will
be shared as it is a United States recognized document. Giving them a
regular and even expired passport will be in all state systems and
that
gives identification without address. If the officer really needs an
address they can fill out form to get it from the United States. They
are
satisfied with that. Even if you move the address is then unknown till
someone retrace or connects you to it. Personal experience they will
not
arrest with that passport but you may still get a ticket. FBI will
keep
that data and confidently for the most part.
To handle a ticket. Part one.
"The Constitution of the United States of America; Article 1,
section 8, clause 17: I'm a United States of America national and NOT
an
United States Citizen." Court will often send another letter and
sometimes
even saying a warrant but have not heard from anyone of them acting
on it.
The same happens with a national passport. I personally travel with a
regular expired passport. If they lose you in the system. They will
spend
hours or days to reconstruct who you are. That is tying you to every
thing
they have on you from a drivers license perspreactive.
Recently in Colorado it appeared the statement failed but upon
further investigation the case was closed and they opened another
case with
new case number, added two more charges without notifying the
individual.
They then handcuffed him then stopped for issues involved. That is
fraud
they were counting on it not to be recognized. It shows to what
crooked
schemes they will go to. Most send another notice and then answer with
statement again to cancel it. These crooks are willing to risk jail
time in
betting on your ignorance.
To make the above quoted statement more solid, add the following
on a piece of paper to hand the officer. It will take care of issues
like
above mentioned.
Part two:
"This national belongs to the best PRIVATE MEMBERSHIP CLUB:
Articles of Confederation and only nationals are allowed. United
States
Citizen's are exempted. We protect life, liberty, and property of
members
and if you decide to violate the private it is $500,000.00 dollars per
occurrence for doing so. Before interaction, give me your Business
card of
your private corporate identification. Without it is another
$500,000.00.
Other charges may apply. "
One could make it $200,000.00 for each question or demand but
without video hard to prove. I suspect they would try to destroy your
recordings. So be careful if you go that route. They hate evidence of
the
facts. So I stay with the obvious facts that can be proven easily.
Now if officer does not give you a business card and often they
will not because it is proof positive of the fact of what is going on
and
will be used in court as an exhibit. They are considered out of
uniform for
not surrendering it upon request. This letter with both qoute parts
will be
your exhibit in court along with business card or lack thereof.
In court which is really just paper work sent to court clerk. That
is your court of record. Not to agency, but court clerk. So back to
that
first letter on being a non-registered lawyer and they are
investigating.
I would not answer it as it is not yet assigned a case number to send
your
response to court clerk for your court recording. Wait for them to
actually
file charges before replying. Then one can start their court record.
Most likely the general courts of jurisdiction will not grant you
the money of that large sum. They will ignore it or rule against you
with
an actual warrant and arrest you. They will protect that money on a
bet you
do not know how or procedure to get the money. They think you will
persist
in trying to get their approval which they will not grant.
This is where the United States Court of Federal Claims comes in.
This is the court of redress for United States injuries. All
governments
are under the United States authority. One can seek redress in all
courts
but this one is the constutional one mentioned in the constitution.
It sits
right across the street from Congress. My understanding is that from
time
to time they have to go to Congress to get approval. Otherwise that
court
has prior approval to a limited amount.
This letter needs written from the perspective of the contract
states and here is the damages. David Straight has a very simple
format for
this that I like. Including property taxation reimbursement and ending
property taxation.
Understanding of what is going on. We nationals have a private
membership association as they call it today. Back in colonial times
it was
seen as a common law trust which is private when not done with the
state
registrar. That trust is the articles of confederation, declaration of
independance and northwest ordinance. Who can belong, free
citizens/nationals. What is the purpose, to protect life, liberty, and
property. What are the rules, they are decided by a trial by jury
with a
claim of injury. Not due process of law in their jurisdicton. Due
process
of law is a deceptive phrase. Due process in their corporation or your
association?
PMA have long been established across the country. The Boy Scouts
got around the gay issue with usage of PMA. Jaycess use it. Many golf
courses use it and why some kept blacks from entering. (I do not
approve
but it does show how powerful the PMA is). In Colorado all but one
vapor
and drug emporium are PMA and were that before the state started
granting
license. It was PMA that changed Colorado and goverment said we
better get
involved and now are trying to license them. As the leader of that
situation states; when the state license proves more lucrative to my
bottom
line. Then I'll get licensed. They also have their own banking system
because United States of America Corp. did not approve the'joint
smoke' so
they could not use a regular bank.
Another deceptive phrase; private membership association. Which
association is the question. Private corporate registered with the
state or
common law trust association?
Now comes the officer of the court (any oath taker). Since the
Clearfield doctrine of 1943 and Judges blue book which is a judges
handbook on issues that states the United States of America
corporation is
a 'private foreign corporation'. Foreign to the constitution and a
private
membership association. With all that understanding the point is
that you
want the officers business card as he just identified his PMA to
which you
are not a member. It's a corporate private association to which you
and I
can choose to belong by acceptance. They need to prove you are a
member.
Claiming you are not as illustrated above (quotations phrase) ends
that
controversy.
Because they never tell you this in your Miranda rights it is
fraud.
All contracts not clearly revealed are fraud. There contract of
how many agencies (6,000)- How can anyone know the contract? Why each
agency is a separate acceptancen contract to their PMA.
Also, officers of the court have no standing or authority because
a corporation (United States of America Corporation) cannot be
approved by
a corporation (United States) whose charter (constitution) does not
grant
to be an PMA; in violation of the original charter.
That is as simple as I can make it. As a lawyer Charles does sign
all papers for his clients because my clients have to agree to be
members
of the PMA: articles of confederation. I do not operate in their
corporate
PMA: United States of America corporation or whatever they claim to
be now
as Anna states they have been this and that and something else for
years.
Who knows, they may be many PMA's. When Glenn gets riled about their
priestly fraud. He has every moral and ethical right to do so. When
the
bible states their is not one righteous. Government proves it in
magnitude
proportion.
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:08 PM Aéius Cercle of
Quantum-Note(Law-Division) <Law@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The ultimate responsibility (for one's own remedies) rests within
ourselves to do our own due diligence and
research/homework/field-testing/etc., anyway. Sure, the
*so-called* «gurus» can give us some ideas as to what to look at,
but, in the end, you should never *blindly follow* what anyone
else says/claims (and *anybody* who *claims* to «know everything»
is *automatically* leading their «followers» down a dangerous
«cult-style» path of «dogmatic-followership»). The guru still cannot
«do
your push-ups» *for* you in order for *your* «muscles» to *get
stronger* (metaphorically).
*Some* «remedies» do seem to be more consistent than others.
Amongst the *more consistent* ones seem to be the following...:
➤ Pre-emptive ESTOPPEL Notices
➤ Asking *them* questions that are «self-incriminating» if/when
you are confronted
*without cause* *➤ Printed NOTICES (warnings) that you can put on
your front door, car-window, covering the VIN-plate, etc.
➤ *Compelling letters* that demonstrate *your*
«intellectual-superiority» over *them* (this is a *much more*
«advanced» way of handling things which takes *far more effort*
than some of the *quicker* «remedies» listed above as this
particular method requires a great deal of knowledge about
psychology, the
sciences, etc., and your ability to quote-reference from *several*
«scientific» publications, even to the point of providing the specific
ISBNs so that there can be NO DOUBT as to the «legitimacy» of the
information where they *cannot* «claim» that you were just
«making stuff up» [most of them are «idiots» anyway who have never
read
more than one non-fiction book in their whole entire lives if
*any*]).
Ultimately, you are still dealing with what is essentially a
«psychological chess-game» (metaphorically speaking), when
interacting with
*any* part of the «courts» related legalese-system (whether it be
the cops out on the streets trying to extort every penny out of you
before
you can even earn a penny or the liars in the court-houses or
otherwise).
On 2021-05-18 3:28 p.m., J_B wrote:
yes beware of ana.. shes hit or miss on her things but then again
could be people not knowing how to apply what she says in combination
with
crooked judge hat wont follow it and therefore gives the image of
false
information
you want to be a state citizen
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:25 PM Joe Skelton <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This sounds like some more of Anna's BS
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021, 02:49:21 PM CDT, The Moab <
g2themoab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All born in the United States are initially Nationals. It does
pertain them, please research passport legal help for American
National.
by : Hernandez-Jr: Gregorio
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED without Prejudice Confidentiality Notice: This
private electronic correspondence, including any/all attachment(s) are
limited for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain
Privileged and/or Confidential Information.
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT. NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE
TO PRINCIPAL. Information in this or any following correspondence is
not to
be construed as legal advice. [Electronic Communications Privacy Act,
18
USC §§ 2510 et seq]
On Tue, May 18, 2021, 1:18 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
this refers to a "national of the US" Not a State Citizen of a
State of the Union. So how does it apply to my Citizenship? A State
Citizen
born on the soil of Oklahoma?
On Sunday, May 16, 2021, 2:24:53 PM CDT, NELSON DICE <
nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/878
Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
--
