On Wednesday, February 9, 2022, 09:41:43 AM EST, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Very nice Debra. Email me back directly. I had a question or 2 thanks
On Feb 9, 2022, at 7:10 AM, Debra Lohri ("ibgiggly4u")
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm trying something different with the judges who (come to find out) are not
actually judges and have no jurisdiction, by their own admission. I put in 2
constitutional questions (I got this from Eeon and Robb Ryder who both did a
video on it). I have cases where they had ruled against me and I put in these
2 questions along with "if you fail to answer these 2 questions you admit that:
You are not working to your oath or affirmation 2) since you are not a
constitutional judge, all of your orders and rulings are void ab initio, and
you have harmed me in the amount of $XXXX, you agree to remove all liens and
encumbrances on property located at XXXX Texas , you agree that you have been
using color of law in my court case 18 USC 241, 242, and........ etc. I have
the judge where she is locked in and cant make anymore rulings and her old ones
were all void and that includes a summary judgment that the liars eh hmmm I
mean lawyers were using to foreclose on me last week. I know that having a case
in court stops the foreclosure and I have put in a document stating that she is
not a judge and her orders are void including the SJ.
Notice of Constitutional Questions
Whereas the third section of the sixth article of the Constitution of the
United States mandates that "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned,
and the Members of the several State Legislators and executive and judicial
officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound
by Oath of Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test
shall ever be Required as a Qualification To any Office or public Trust under
the United States and:
Whereas "An act to regulate the Time and Manner of administering certain
Oaths" is the first law passed by the United States Congress after the
ratification of the Constitution of the "United States Statutes at Large" as I
Stat. 23 (Attached) and:
Whereas 1 USC 112: Statutes at large; contents admissibility is evidence;
mandates that "The United States Statutes at Large" shall be legal evidence of
laws... in all the courts of the United States, the several States, and the
Territories and insular possessions of the United States (Attached)
1.) Are the laws the defendant is accused of offending enacted by
constitutionally qualified persons?
2.) Are the Court's judicial and executive officers constitutionally qualified
to prosecute
and adjudicate the Laws of the State of Texas?
Attachments:
1 U.S. Code § 112 - Statutes at Large; contents; admissibility in evidence
U.S. Code
The Archivist of the United States shall cause to be compiled, edited,
indexed, and published, the United States Statutes at Large, which shall
contain all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during each regular
session of Congress; all proclamations by the President in the numbered series
issued since the date of the adjournment of the regular session of Congress
next preceding; and also any amendments to the Constitution of the United
States proposed or ratified pursuant to article V thereof since that date,
together with the certificate of the Archivist of the United States issued in
compliance with the provision contained in section 106b of this title. In the
event of an extra session of Congress, the Archivist of the United States shall
cause all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during said extra session
to be consolidated with, and published as part of, the contents of the volume
for the next regular session. The United States Statutes at Large shall be
legal evidence of laws, concurrent resolutions, treaties, international
agreements other than treaties, proclamations by the President, and proposed or
ratified amendments to the Constitution of the United States therein contained,
in all the courts of the United States, the several States, and the Territories
and insular possessions of the United States.
(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 636; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1001, § 1, 64 Stat.
979; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 3, 65 Stat. 710; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §
107(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2291.)
Chapter Ⅰ.Statute 23—An Act to regulate the Time and Manner of administering
certain Oaths.
Constitution of the U.S. article 6, page 19.Sec. 1. Be it enacted by the
Senate and [House of] Representatives of the United States of America in
Congress assembled, That the oath or affirmation required by the sixth article
of the Constitution of the United States, shall be administered in the form
following, Form of the oath or affirmation to support the Constitution of the
United States, to be administered to the members of the Senate and to the
members of the House of Representatives. to wit: “I, A. B. do solemnly swear or
affirm (as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United
States.” The said oath or affirmation shall be administered within three days
after the passing of this act, by any one member of the Senate, to the
President of the Senate, and by him to all the members and to the secretary;
and by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to all the members who have
not taken a similar oath, by virtue of a particular resolution of the said
House, and to the clerk: and in case of the absence of any member from the
service of either House, at the time prescribed for taking the said oath or
affirmation, the same shall be administered to such member, when he shall
appear to take his seat.
Manner of administering the oath or affirmation to Speaker of the House of
Representatives. Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That at the first session
of Congress after every general election of Representatives, the oath or
affirmation aforesaid, shall be administered by any one member of the House of
Representatives to the Speaker; and by him to all the members present, and to
the clerk, previous to entering on any other business; and to the members who
shall afterwards appear, previous to taking their seats. The President of the
Senate for the time being, shall also administer to each Senator. the said oath
or affirmation to each Senator who shall hereafter be elected, previous to his
taking his seat: and in any future case of a President of the Senate, who shall
not have taken the said oath or affirmation, the same shall be administered to
him by any one of the members of the Senate.
Affidavit of Service (to all the attorneys and the judge)
On 2/7/2022 10:54 PM, Paul M (willys59sw) wrote:
should be the Constitutions, same as Senators, House reps, cops" - Support and
Defend the USA against all enemies foreign and domestic - of course must
question them if they carry a bar card or a FARC (Foreign Agent Registration.
Natural Born Citizen of State of ---
On Monday, February 7, 2022, 10:19:09 PM CST, Laurence Mucthison
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2. How would on find out about bond information from a county which
department holds this information
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
check this out im going through the sane thing right now
