I'm trying something different with the judges who (come to find out)
are not actually judges and have no jurisdiction, by their own
admission. I put in 2 constitutional questions (I got this from Eeon and
Robb Ryder who both did a video on it). I have cases where they had
ruled against me and I put in these 2 questions along with "if you fail
to answer these 2 questions you admit that: You are not working to your
oath or affirmation 2) since you are not a constitutional judge, all of
your orders and rulings are void ab initio, and you have harmed me in
the amount of $XXXX, you agree to remove all liens and encumbrances on
property located at XXXX Texas , you agree that you have been using
color of law in my court case 18 USC 241, 242, and........ etc. I have
the judge where she is locked in and cant make anymore rulings and her
old ones were all void and that includes a summary judgment that the
liars eh hmmm I mean lawyers were using to foreclose on me last week. I
know that having a case in court stops the foreclosure and I have put in
a document stating that she is not a judge and her orders are void
including the SJ.
Notice of Constitutional Questions
Whereas the third section of the sixth article of the Constitution of
the United States mandates that "The Senators and Representatives before
mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislators and
executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the
several States, shall be bound by Oath of Affirmation, to support this
Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be Required as a
Qualification To any Office or public Trust under the United States and:
Whereas "An act to regulate the Time and Manner of administering certain
Oaths" is the first law passed by the United States Congress after the
ratification of the Constitution of the "United States Statutes at
Large" as I Stat. 23 (Attached) and:
Whereas 1 USC 112: Statutes at large; contents admissibility is
evidence; mandates that "The United States Statutes at Large" shall be
legal evidence of laws... in all the courts of the United States, the
several States, and the Territories and insular possessions of the
United States (Attached)
1.) Are the laws the defendant is accused of offending enacted by
constitutionally qualified persons?
2.) Are the Court's judicial and executive officers constitutionally
qualified to prosecute
and adjudicate the Laws of the State of Texas?
Attachments:
1 U.S. Code § 112 - Statutes at Large; contents; admissibility in
evidence U.S. Code
The Archivist of the United States shall cause to be compiled, edited,
indexed, and published, the United States Statutes at Large, which shall
contain all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during each
regular session of Congress; all proclamations by the President in the
numbered series issued since the date of the adjournment of the regular
session of Congress next preceding; and also any amendments to the
Constitution of the United States proposed or ratified pursuant to
article V thereof since that date, together with the certificate of the
Archivist of the United States issued in compliance with the provision
contained in section 106b of this title. In the event of an extra
session of Congress, the Archivist of the United States shall cause all
the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during said extra session to
be consolidated with, and published as part of, the contents of the
volume for the next regular session. The United States Statutes at Large
shall be legal evidence of laws, concurrent resolutions, treaties,
international agreements other than treaties, proclamations by the
President, and proposed or ratified amendments to the Constitution of
the United States therein contained, in all the courts of the United
States, the several States, and the Territories and insular possessions
of the United States.
(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 636; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1001, § 1, 64
Stat. 979; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 3, 65 Stat. 710; Pub. L. 98–497,
title I, § 107(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat.2291.)
Chapter Ⅰ.S/tatute 23—An Act to regulate the Time and Manner of
administering cert/ain Oaths.
Constitution of the U.S.article 6, page 19
<https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Statutes_at_Large/Volume_1/Organic_Laws_of_the_United_States/Constitution_of_the_United_States#19>.Sec.
1. /Be it enacted by the Senate and [House of] Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled/, That the oath or
affirmation required by the sixth article of the Constitution of the
United States
<https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Statutes_at_Large/Volume_1/Organic_Laws_of_the_United_States/Constitution_of_the_United_States>,
shall be administered in the form following, Form of the oath or
affirmation to support the Constitution of the United States
<https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States>, to
be administered to the members of the Senate and to the members of the
House of Representatives. to wit: “I, A. B. do solemnly swear or affirm
(as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United
States.” The said oath or affirmation shall be administered within three
days after the passing of this act, by any one member of the Senate, to
the President of the Senate
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States_Senate>,
and by him to all the members and to the secretary
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary_of_the_United_States_Senate>;
and by the Speaker of the House of Representatives
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives>,
to all the members who have not taken a similar oath, by virtue of a
particular resolution of the said House, and to the clerk
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clerk_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives>:
and in case of the absence of any member from the service of either
House, at the time prescribed for taking the said oath or affirmation,
the same shall be administered to such member, when he shall appear to
take his seat.
Manner of administering the oath or affirmation to Speaker of the House
of Representatives. Sec. 2. /And be it further enacted/, That at the
first session of Congress after every general election of
Representatives, the oath or affirmation aforesaid, shall be
administered by any one member of the House of Representatives to the
Speaker; and by him to all the members present, and to the clerk,
previous to entering on any other business; and to the members who shall
afterwards appear, previous to taking their seats. The President of the
Senate for the time being, shall also administer to each Senator. the
said oath or affirmation to each Senator who shall hereafter be elected,
previous to his taking his seat: and in any future case of a President
of the Senate, who shall not have taken the said oath or affirmation,
the same shall be administered to him by any one of the members of the
Senate.
Affidavit of Service (to all the attorneys and the judge)
On 2/7/2022 10:54 PM, Paul M (willys59sw) wrote:
should be the Constitutions, same as Senators, House reps, cops" - Support and Defend the USA against all enemies foreign and domestic - of course must question them if they carry a bar card or a FARC (Foreign Agent Registration. Natural Born Citizen of State of ---
On Monday, February 7, 2022, 10:19:09 PM CST, Laurence Mucthison <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2. How would on find out about bond information from a county which department holds this information
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
