Nelson
Remember that for you to go to their court is diffidently a divine appearance.
Divine meaning "like a god" -:)
On Oct 27, 2021, 9:22 AM -0600, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Well a man never goes in a pro se. man goes in as sou juris. And makes it a
note on the record 3 times. One makes standing and the other show intent of
that standing. And show only up as special Devine appearance
On Oct 27, 2021, at 10:20 AM, The Experts <experts303@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What would happen if we forwarded this to all county municipal courts...
(let them know we are on to the scheme and scam they are involved in)
Sincerely Enjoy life,
By: Daniel Henderson Hornburg
"OUTSMART, OUTGUN & OUTLAST Your Competition!"
For entertainment Only/Not legal advice.
As a disclaimer, I am not a Republican just an honest observer
without all the emotional baggage and social programming.
I do not take part in the pharmaceutical religion, My right to choose my
Spirituality!
If you don't know your rights, you don’t know your options and/or the
opportunities!
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 8:08 AM cordero
<dmarc-noreply-outsider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NOTES: I would be grateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this
email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media
as widely as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We
the People; e.g., click “Reply All” and send.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go
to http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register
or + New or Users >Add New.
The article below had a consistent format when sent. If
it shows irregularities when received, they crept in during transit and
are beyond my control. Kindly overlook them.
Whining as a pro se
v.
writing in up to 500 words
your story of judges' abuse of power and
sending it in for a chance to tell it to the national public at
unprecedented citizens hearings
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_writing_reliable_stories&telling_national_public.pdf
By
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx ,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries,
Thank you for your emails.
A. Gross mistakes that give you away as a pro se, i.e., a party without
a lawyer in court
quote_type
1. Where have you ever seen a case in court in which something is so
"evident" that no opposing counsel can make a persuasive argument to
the contrary and the judge "must" accept the proponent party's
conclusion, which that party has not even bothered to argue by
presenting factual and legal reasons for it?
2. In the same vein, if you write a motion but do not include the
only section that matters, namely, "Relief Requested", the court is
not requested to do anything. Much worse yet, the opposing party need
not do anything either, not even answer your motion, for you have not
given notice of what is at stake in the motion and what it risks by
failing to file an answer. Your motion does not require judicial
action. There is no decision that can be taken by default. You have
merely wasted your effort, time, and money. In addition, you have
deluded yourself by thinking that you are a good party who asks
"nicely". You are nothing but another pro se who has filed yet
another whining anecdote!
3. And extravagant to boot! Pro ses hardly ever read anything.
Consequently, they lack the breadth and depth of knowledge of the law
and the courts to compare their personal case to anything anywhere
near a representative sample of the scores of millions of cases
already decided or still pending before unaccountable judges. In
reliance on their unaccountability, judges abuse their power
risklessly and systematically for their gain and convenience: Abuse
is their means of doing business. That is why there are so many cases
of abuse. Too many for a pro se to claim that he or she has ‘the most
abusive case ever!’
B. When you go to court, you always pay a price, one way or another
quote_type
4. You cannot improvise yourself as a lawyer. You can certainly not
do so without reading, and rereading, and reading again many
materials until you understand how the law works as a complex system
of interconnected rules...not merely your anecdote in court.
5. When people go to court representing themselves pro se, they get
the quality of representation that they paid for with their $0.00.
6. Tough love! Whining is cheap and easy. But it gets you nowhere.
7. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER...and it costs a lot to gain it and to put it
to work for clients. To do so it takes a lot of TIME which IS MONEY.
Hence, if you want a chance, however slim, of winning your case at
least to some extent, then you either make the enormous effort that
it took people to read a very large amount of materials for three
years at law school so as to gain the knowledge necessary to become
lawyers or you pay lawyers their fees and expenses so that they may
represent you in court and in negotiations with the opposing party.
8. My attorney's fee is $350 per hour, which is deducted together
with all necessary and incidental expenses from a retainer paid in
advance and whose amount is fixed based on the work agreed upon.
Discussing with me your personal, local case benefits only you, not
the national public. Therefore, it is consulting and attracts my
attorney's fee. It is not realistic or reasonable to expect that I
should provide consultation and representation for free to everybody
who contacts me by email, mail, and phone.
C. Turning your anecdote into a story useful to you and others,
including investigators
quote_type
9. However, you can turn your anecdote into a story that is accurate,
significant, and verifiable by applying the two-phase method. You
will learn how to write in up to 500 words your story of judges'
abuse of power that you have suffered or witnessed. Yet, you will be
able to include among those words the data necessary for
investigators to audit your story together with many other stories to
detect what is the most convincing type of incriminating evidence:
patterns of abuse of power and schemes of financial criminality.
10. The article describing that method provides two blocs of very
pertinent email addresses to which you can send your story for a
chance to tell it to the national public. They are the addresses of:
a. the members of the Biden Commission for the reform of the Supreme
Court; and
b. top media outlets and VIP people that have investigated federal
and state judges already or that can follow the daring pioneers in
publishing their findings of judges' abuse of power and financial
criminality; e.g.:
1) The Wall Street Journal
2) Thomson Reuters
3) The Boston Globe
4) The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists
5) Senator Elizabeth Warren
11. After you have written your story, you can send it together with
this article to them by placing the following blocs of email
addresses in the To: and the cc: boxes, respectively, of your email:
quote_type
quote_type
To: [commissioners of the Biden Commission]
quote_type
cristina.rodriguez@xxxxxxxx, robert.bauer@xxxxxxx,
kandrias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack.balkin@xxxxxxxx,
RBauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, baude@xxxxxxxxxxxx, madams@xxxxxx,
charles@xxxxxxxxxxxx, acrespo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wdellinger@xxxxxxx,
ecb95@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, justin.driver@xxxxxxxx,
rfallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, heather.k.gerken@xxxxxxxx,
ngertner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgoldsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tgriffith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tgrove@xxxxxxxxxx,
bhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mkang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
ojohns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lacroix@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lemos@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
levi@xxxxxxxxxxxx, staff@xxxxxxxxxxxx, trevor.morrison@xxxxxxx,
cnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rick.pildes@xxxxxxx,
mramsey@xxxxxxxxxxxx, krooseve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
bross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, d-strauss@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
tribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, awhite36@xxxxxxx, kewhitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
michael.waldman@xxxxxxx, caroline.fredrickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
development@xxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx ,
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
quote_type
quote_type
cc: [top media outlets and journalists]
quote_type
James.Grimaldi@xxxxxxx, Coulter.Jones@xxxxxxx,
Joe.Palazzolo@xxxxxxx, contact@xxxxxxxx, gryle@xxxxxxxx,
fshiel@xxxxxxxx, investigations@xxxxxxxx, insiders@xxxxxxxx,
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Elizabeth_Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
john.shiffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
michael.berens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
blake.morrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
marketresearch.thomsonreuters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, “Todd Wallack”
<twallack@xxxxxxxxx>, patricia.wen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, “Brian McGrory
Editor” <brian.mcgrory@xxxxxxxxx>, newstip@xxxxxxxxx,
spotlight@xxxxxxxxx, charles.ornstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tracy.weber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, “Veterans Today Senior Editor Gordon
Duff” <gpduf@xxxxxxx>, “Veterans Today Managing Editor Jim W Dean”
<jimwdean@xxxxxxx>, ajaffe@xxxxxxxxxxx, Thehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
newsletters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mderienzo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, watchdog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
emily.holden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tips@xxxxxxxxxxx,
ryan.grim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
tips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Evan.Allen@xxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxx,
Elizabeth_Warren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ginger.thompson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
mcnulaj@xxxxxxxxxxx, MCoyle@xxxxxxx, communication@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
aglantz@xxxxxxxxxxxx, inytletters@xxxxxxxxxxx,
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, aturturro@xxxxxxx, Opencourt@xxxxxxx,
letters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Matt.Rocheleau@xxxxxxxxx, oped@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Jackie.Botts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Jaimi.Dowdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vernal.Coleman@xxxxxxxxx,
NTotenberg@xxxxxxx, Brendan.McCarthy@xxxxxxxxx,
D. A website with 39,968+ subscribers, its articles, and a study that
promote the telling of your stories at unprecedented citizens hearing
quote_type
12. You may also find the article describing the two-phase method for
writing your story on the website Judicial Discipline Reform at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. That and similar articles ;
have attracted so many webvisitors that 39,968 have become
subscribers as of October 23, 2021.
13. You too can subscribe for free to its articles. Go to that
website <left panel ↓Register or + New or Users >Add
New.
14. The articles are based on my three-volume study of judges and
their judiciaries. It is titled and downloadable thus:
Exposing Judges' Unaccountability
and Consequent Riskless Abuse of Power:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* † ♣
quote_typeE. Every meaningful cause needs resources for its advancement;
♣ Volume 3:
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL3/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates3.pdf
>from OL3:1144-1380+
i. Open the downloaded files using Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available for free.
15. To afford people a chance to tell the national public their
stories of abuse by judges, the articles, the website, and the study
promote the holding of unprecedented citizens hearing.
16. These hearings are to be organized by media outlets and students
and professors; and held at media stations, university auditoriums,
and via video conference so that the largest number of people can
tell their stories inexpensively wherever they are. Their many
stories will provide investigators and everybody else enough
information to detect patterns of abuse and schemes of financial
criminality.
17. Your stories will inform and outrage the national public. So much
so that the public will join forces to expose judges; and demand that
politicians in office as well as those running for it in the next
primaries and mid-term elections officially investigate and expose
judges.
18. The public, outraged, will also demand effective results: that We
the People, the Masters of all public servants, be able to exercise
our right to hold judicial public servants accountable for the public
power entrusted to them, and liable to compensate the victims of
their abuse.
19. Abusees' collective demand for compensation by judges and their
judiciaries will seek to bring Judges Above the Law and the
judiciaries that they run as racketeering enterprises down to the
level where they, like doctors and hospitals, police and their
departments, priests and their churches, etc., are subjected to Equal
Justice Under Law.
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money:
Lip service advances nothing;
but it continues to enable the abusers.
You can help continue and advance our common cause through
Judicial Discipline Reform
DONATE
to support its professional law research and writing,
and strategic thinking
by making a deposit or an online transfer to
Citi Bank, routing number 021 000 089, account 4977 59 2001
through Zelle
through Paypal
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJby
or
by mailing a check to the address below.
Dare trigger history!...and you may enter it.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd
Bronx, New York City 10472-6506
tel. +1(718)827-9521
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’s email and e-cloud
storage accounts described at * >ggl:1 et seq. and † >OL2:1114§G, when
emailing him, copy the above bloc of his email addresses and paste it
in the To: line of your email so as to enhance the chances of your
email reaching him at least at one of those addresses.
*************************
