I second that thought! The framers reviled any notion of a democracy in America!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2022, at 2:08 PM, Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Anytime I see ()democracy) I almost puke. FDR may have converted this the
govt from Constitutional Republic to A Congressional Democracy, but the
original 5 documents that founded this nation are still alive.
Please be careful what you support or hope for
On Saturday, June 11, 2022 at 01:22:15 PM CDT, Michael Glavic
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On my plugging (persuading) for the implementation of a Citizen's
Communication Registry.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-its-time-to-consider-mandatory-voting/#comments
I'm for the implementation of a Citizen's Communication Registry (originally,
People's Communication Registry) where, when you have a grievance, or great
idea... you don't have to come here or to the media (if even to a lawyer) for
it to be seen and addressed, incorporating who received the complaint, or
idea, from the state, (who better to be dealing with as much or the matter,
or to counting as truly social and just, whatever else a government might be
good for) to see where it was directed and who did what about it, if not the
answer or remedy, that all could be seen and validated as to the evidence if
not primary evidence, and that justice and democracy (of our true
representation and individuality) would be better served.
I will be persisting mainly in this direction going forward, wherever I can
be heard in such respect, avoiding the political or being misconstrued as
being political (or democratic, otherwise) as much as possible. The rest of
my stuff (by and large) shall be like I expect from the media (and its/our
political leadership) and that is to be mainly informing and not part of the
problem, as to my intention of prioritizing justice and serving it in such
respect.
Michael Glavic
Champion of Justice
On Saturday, June 11, 2022, 02:19:12 p.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<bydefinitionofunderstanding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-its-time-to-consider-mandatory-voting/#comments
I'm for the implementation of a Citizen's Communication Registry (originally,
People's Communication Registry) where, when you have a grievance, or great
idea... you don't have to come here or to the media (if even to a lawyer) for
it to be seen and addressed, incorporating who received the complaint, or
idea, from the state, (who better to be dealing with as much or the matter,
or to counting as truly social and just, whatever else a government might be
good for) to see where it was directed and who did what about it, if not the
answer or remedy, that all could be seen and validated as to the evidence if
not primary evidence, and that justice and democracy (of our true
representation and individuality) would be better served.
I will be persisting mainly in this direction going forward, wherever I can
be heard in such respect, avoiding the political or being misconstrued as
being political (or democratic, otherwise) as much as possible. The rest of
my stuff (by and large) shall be like I expect from the media (and its/our
political leadership) and that is to be mainly informing and not part of the
problem, as to my intention of prioritizing justice and serving it in such
respect.
Michael Glavic
Champion of Justice
On Friday, June 10, 2022, 02:08:15 p.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<bydefinitionofunderstanding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-its-time-to-consider-mandatory-voting/#comments
Just be sure/r they are vetted Canadians, (or innocent of abuse, that hasn't
been justly reconciled with) re., real Canadians or good people and not
unvetted foreign interlopers or whatever, (opportunists, if not worse) and
not a burden on our society, as those who get away with injustice or abuse,
for the political expediency of it if not for the votes, or to support the
deceiving BS.
Politicians, or candidates for political office should also if not especially
be vetted, if not exposed for what they truly are and/or are for in such
regard, at least to such test and testing, that we might have the liberty and
productivity of justice, that we deserve in such regard, (where we do)
whatever else should matter.. .
Yes.
Champion of a Justice if not a true/r Canada, Etc.
On Friday, June 10, 2022, 12:34:20 a.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<bydefinitionofunderstanding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
In a democracy, where claims of government legitimacy rely on elections,
turnout matters
"I've" reported what I consider abusive comments and editing/censorship here,
to serving justice. I tried to be more reasonable
I go carefully against violence and abuse, including mandating things, for
what I consider more reasonable (of the better behaviour, but what else) in
such respect, realizing, there is a time and place for greater action or
force, as to the otherwise of "communication," in such regard.
Consider as much a "treat" if not a gift, (of consideration!) please do.. .
Beware those lurking in the dark. Try to expose if not treat them as best you
can, for a "brighter" world..
Champion of Justice
On Friday, June 10, 2022, 12:00:57 a.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<bydefinitionofunderstanding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
In a democracy, where claims of government legitimacy rely on elections,
turnout matters
Why I reported a comment as offensive:
It's a lie, of an insult that I wasn't allowed to respond to or report, from
many previous attempts, so now I want to get what you call it when I'm not
allowed to report an abuse so you more easily understand what happened when I
call your leadership to my problem with the Globe if not continuing with
subscribing to it in such regard.
Champion of Justice
Yeah.
On Thursday, June 9, 2022, 11:51:37 p.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<bydefinitionofunderstanding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
In a democracy, where claims of government legitimacy rely on elections,
turnout matters
Why shouldn't I cancel my Globe and Mail subscription? I don't want to hear
from you on this, doug060643
The "Globe and Mail" should know what I'm talking about and doing, (It
deserves as much, if not from our being of a similar spirit or nature, of
reasoning, I Felt) of what I understand and serve in such respect, re.,
without abuse, (insults, threats, censorship) at least at one time.. .
Apparently I can't (wasn't) allowed to "report" an abuse. Perhaps the Globe
and Mail was being abused in such respect? I'll give it the benefit of the
doubt in such regard. I think we all should, before acting "too hastily".
(Also, my answer to voting?!)
I go where I'm appreciated in such regard, not thinking I'm being truly
informed, as supported, where it matters to me, otherwise.
Give it some thought, more thought, where necessary.
Champion of Justice
On Thursday, June 9, 2022, 11:26:05 p.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<bydefinitionofunderstanding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
In a democracy, where claims of government legitimacy rely on elections,
turnout matters
It seems you also like to be insulting, and as much is tolerated here, I
Reckon
Figure, I'm on to more than just you in what I speak and do, of my education,
research, Etc..
I count you as mostly a lwyer at this point (giving you the benefit of the
doubt) that could become worse in such regard. I'm on to the signs of,
escalating abuse, hoping such treatment as mine gets you (etc.) on a/the
better path, in such regard.. .
I don't wait for others to defend me for the problems I speak of relative to
what also if not especially constitutes a dictatorship, you being merely if
not more proof of what I speak, with your insults, if not worse
To Doug, etc., on account of I get censored, of a dictatorship, where more
direct?.
It seems you also like to be insulting, and as much is tolerated here, I
Reckon
Figure, I'm on to more than just you in what I speak and do, of my education,
research, Etc..
I count you as mostly a lwyer (liar) at this point (giving you the benefit of
the doubt) that could become worse in such regard. I'm on to the signs of,
escalating abuse, hoping such treatment as mine gets you (etc.) on a/the
better path, in such regard.. .
I don't wait for others to defend me for the problems I speak of relative to
what also if not especially constitutes a dictatorship, you being merely if
not more proof of what I speak, with your insults, if not threats, if not
worse.. .
Where I'm not allowed to speak on this matter I will logically, to me, be
considering cancelling my Globe and Mail subscription, how I can't be
bothered to being misrepresented and misinformed, and/or abused, as far as
being insulted, threatened, censored, etc.!.
Wait, to see what I do, next?. I'll call the leadership of the Globe to find
out what's the problem if not, their problem.. . Really, (seriously) and hope
that helps get to the bottom of the problem, or at least, closer to what I
need to deal with in such respect..
Champion of Justice
See me in action.
Or what
On Thursday, June 9, 2022, 01:06:27 p.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<bydefinitionofunderstanding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
In a democracy, where claims of government legitimacy rely on elections,
turnout matters
To, what makes Canada a dictatorship?
Keeping us ill informed, if not by outright lying to us, giving us few
choices to rule by, and limiting our representation in such respect, oh, and
using resources (money) extorted from us not primarily to serve justice (but
passing it around, usually by vote buying, which is wrong to do) as rampant
as injustice seems to be, to most everyone?. Yeah, for starters
I haven't even seen the "Protest Vote" count yet, (for looking) like they
take legitimate democratic protest, or, what is needed to what is deserved,
if not to constitutional change for what is better and more reasonable, as
seriously. (Inviting, guess what, if you can) The state/government, as of
politics, is a form of dictatorship (to have its way, how it does, also, in
limiting communication, how individuals communicate, what is entailed to be
represented by a true democracy) typically denying of such expression and
representation, for what it's about, prioritizing and doing.
That doesn't even count how the police and police abuse is prioritized over
the common citizen, forgetting the courts of law for the moment, what an
abomination I find them, etc., and things even seeming to be getting worse,
as to Coyne's proposal
and,
Indeed, it does seem many Canadians "want" a dictatorship, which I intend to
challenge.. .
Champion of Justice, vs., the abusive/criminal (otherwise
On Thursday, June 9, 2022, 11:05:50 a.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<bydefinitionofunderstanding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
Opinion: Mandatory voting works in Australia. It can work in Canada, too
In a democracy, where claims of government legitimacy rely on elections,
turnout matters
Support being more "informing" (true, in such regard, or still get the lesser
answers/votes, etc.) and help people do the right, more just (ethical) thing
in such regard rather than supporting the contradiction and hypocrisy (and
related abuses, as to the lie of lying) of a democratic dictatorship, based
on forcing/mandating people to vote if not vote like you, which proves of
little reasoning when you think about it.
Figure there are other if not better ways to serve "justice" (despite what
you might have been taught) in such respect, whatever good there might be to
democracy or "anything" otherwise, but, I haven't seen anything better
Come up with better answers (or do more of the work?) or support others doing
So, so I don't have to call you a liar (where not worse?) or be forced to
have nothing better to say.. .
Or what? I'm really keen on dealing with dictatorships and
abuse/injustice/censorship, So, you might want to watch yourself, if not
merely as I do in such respect, "anyone," and/or anything, yes.
Indeed, I've set myself up for a pretty principled if not integrating
challenge in such regard. I believe we all should, not to be part of the
problem, or of the lesser.. .
And:
People do things where it is proven "reasonable" to do so, as where being
informed, or to be like others... (that not necessarily just being for them
and their sakes) and not necessarily where it is of a law (as with politics,
but what else) or forced on people with mandates and violent or abusive
consequences, re., as to little or no reasoning..
I challenge that we even need any politics, and laws, (of force) etc.,
otherwise. By my figuring, and behaviour, (vs.?) we don't need to mandate
anything but to give the problem a proper dose of its own medicine, as a last
resort, as where punishing criminals
I still, So especially figure we should be more informing, (including,
honest, openly honest) in such regard, and not by a dictator or dictatorship
to avoid the problem if not, further problems, typically, not of a much or as
good as as much.. Of such, "choices," I reason better, if not rule, or hope
to rule, if not, with everyone and everything (what makes for a "true"
democracy) in such respect.
Champion of Justice
On Wednesday, June 8, 2022, 09:52:52 p.m. EDT, Michael Glavic
<bydefinitionofunderstanding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-its-time-to-consider-mandatory-voting/#comments
Not looking for a "dictatorship," especially of stupidity and/or unethical
force, that doesn't make for a mind (of ones own, but what else) and what is
needed as deserved if not for the correct answer(s), of "reasoning" in such
regard.
My vote, or, "No," to mandating limited and limiting choice/s, re., abusive
behavior, including censorship and misrepresentation of the the truly
representative (The truth?!.) if not all we can be in such respect, Etc.. .
Or what? Democracy police? (Democratic Dictatorship?) Not if I can help it,
and define things more as they are if not should be, in such respect.. .
I suppose it's worth discussing, for those who need it
Champion of Justice, oh, and democracy, if not meaning
