To someone saying "family" should come first and nepotism (of socialism? of
politics?.) is OK, if not the power that should be
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/first-person/article-why-cant-there-be-a-vaccine-for-racism/#comments
Groups (like friends, perhaps, of such friends?) should fall (come second?)
behind families which should fall behind individuals as far as I, of "justice,"
(So, actually served, or it ain't, truly accurate, I Figure) of such justice
(as, not of politics, and/or the abuse, problem...) am concerned..
Best to give the job(s) to those best qualified to do them, (with little or
nothing to do with politics or the popularity contest of, fantasy and lies)
say, as with a free and open (of "choice," especially encompassing such
choice...) to the paying customer, market... and credit to those who deserve
it, and maybe charity to anyone else... that, should be up to the "individual"
paying for it in such respect, or it's an abuse
Otherwise, I understand we would be dealing with thievery, if not worse,
possibly if not probably of family and a government not doing the/its job, of
"justice" and serving it better if not as good as it could and should.
I have little or no use for family or our government/state, (politics) or
whatever you want to call it, otherwise, as to the, So reasonable. The
reasonable makes for my true love. Take it from there, of such choice(s) and a,
justice, So true.
Michael Glavic
Champion of such, logic, justice, language, of Communication, Etc..
To someone saying "family" should come first and nepotism (of socialism? of
politics?.) is OK, if not the power that should be. I said "no" to it, and
behaved, accordingly, for what I consider is better if not best, in such respect