NOTES: I would begrateful if you would acknowledge receipt of this email.
You are encouraged to share and post it to social media aswidely
as possible in your own interest and that of the rest of We thePeople; e.g.,
click “Reply All” andsend.
To subscribe to articles similar to the one hereunder go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org ;<left panel↓Register or + New
or Users >Add New.
The article below had aconsistent format when sent. If it shows
irregularities when received, theycrept in during transit and are beyond my
control. Kindly overlook them. Using your story of abuse of power by judges
to encourage university students and journalists
to expose the refusal of
the Biden Commission on the reform of the Supreme Court to hear abusees on
the practice of abuse by justices and judges
while hearing only professors on the theory of constitutional law; and
to hold the proposed
unprecedented citizens hearings
through which the national public will be
informed of, and outraged at, unaccountable judges’ riskless abuse of power, and
given the opportunity to collectively demand compensation
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero_citizens_hearings_by_students&journalists.pdf
By Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.Ph.D.,University of Cambridge, EnglandM.B.A.,
University of Michigan Business SchoolD.E.A., La Sorbonne, ParisJudicial
Discipline ReformNew York
Cityhttp://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.orgDr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx ;
, DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx Dear Dr.
P. McCullough,SCOTUSblog publisher T. Goldstein, editor J. Romoser, columnist
for lawstudents S. Wermiel, petitions intern M. Jagodinski, Journalists,
Academics, andAdvocates of Honest Judiciaries,
mcculloughperry44@xxxxxxxxx, tgoldstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
jromoser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
swermiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mjagodinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, I thank all
those Advocates whoreplied to my articleon the two-phase method for writing in
up to 500 words your story of the abuseby judges that you have suffered or
witnessed, for instance, as a party orwhile clerking for judges or reporting on
their courts and decisions. This article describes concrete,reasonable, and
feasible steps that you can take toward the objective ofenabling people to tell
the national public their stories at a publicmeeting of the Biden Commission
for the reform of the Supreme Court, and at theproposed unprecedentedcitizens
hearings to be organized by university students, professors, and journalists
andheld all over the country at their university auditoriums, media stations,
andvia video conference. This is also a story pitch: I ampitching this story
as well as a series of analytical pieces on judges andtheir judiciaries, which
are already written and available for your evaluation(Appendix6). I can write
articles on commission. All are supportedby my three-volume study on this
subject based on professional law research andwriting, and strategic thinking.
The study is titled and downloadable thus: ExposingJudges' Unaccountability
andConsequent Riskless Abuse of Power:Pioneering thenews and publishing field
ofjudicial unaccountability and abuse reporting* † ♣
a. Many of my articles are posted to my website Judicial Discipline Reform at
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org. They have attracted so many ;
webvisitors and the latter have reactedto them so positively that 39,149+ have
become subscribers to the siteas of July 24, 2021(App.3).
1) How many law firms, never mind lawyers, do youknow who have a website with
so many subscribers?
2) You can join the subscribers thus: go to
http://www.Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org <left panel ↓Register or + New
or Users >AddNew.
A. Using your story of judicial abuse as the basisof a presentation and the
formation of a chapter of Advocates
1. Your poignant story, Dr. McCullough,is particularly well-written and
supported by relevant citations. Your highacademic degrees afford you special
access to your former law schools andcurrent deans and professors as well as
class presidents and other officers,and student associations. Likewise, the
first-hand knowledge of judicial abuse thatyou gained during your dramatic
experience gives you ‘standing’ to approachassociations of public defenders,
innocent program officers, and the unjustlyincarcerated.
2. You and other Advocates of HonestJudiciaries who are willing to take
action, as opposed to merely complain, canjoin forces to do what is so
necessary to cause the greatest number of storiesto be submitted to the members
of the Biden Commission (see their emailaddresses in paragraph55) and to
promote the proposed unprecedented citizens hearings: form Tea Party-like local
and video chapters. 3. Many of such chapters spread acrossthe U.S. –and
subsequently abroad– can become the composite engine throughwhich committed
people advance the common cause of forming a national, singleissue, apolitical,
civic movement for judicial abuseof power exposure; compensationof abusees; and
reform through transformative change –the judiciary that goesinto change only
after full exposureof the nature, extent, and gravity of its abuse will come
out transformed intoa new system of justice because reforms inconceivable today
will be madeirresistible by an informedand outraged national public–. 4. You
can be instrumental in forming achapter constituted of the members of the
entities mentioned in paragraph 1above. 5. It is true that due to the
conflictof interests described in the article(OL3:1308§D) on the Biden
Commission, law deans and professors are compromised andwill likely be
reluctant to expose judges’ abuse of power. 6. By contrast, university
students, e.g., those at law, journalism, business, and Information Technology
schools, are stillimbued with a sense of justice and the idealistic
determination of using therule of law, 'the Power of the News' and of numbers,
and the force of the fourth industrial (the digital) revolution, to make the
world a more just and fair place.
7. The presentation can be offered also at other venues reasonably expected to
be interested in enabling their members to tell their stories of the abuse by
judges that they have suffered or witnessed.
8. By contacting their classpresident and other officers -e.g., through the
dean of students, their school and association website, and social media- you
can offer to make a presentation on:
a. the nature, extent, and gravity ofjudges’ unaccountability and consequent
riskless abuse of power for their gainand convenience(OL2:1125¶4);and
b. how the students can appeal to theBiden Commission to expose unaccountable
abusive judges. By so doing, they would be following theexample of the students
at Harvard, Yale, and other Ivy League law schools whocontacted the Senate and
journalists to manifest their opposition to theconfirmation of Then-Judge Brett
Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court(OL2:773; OL2:971).
9. The presentation will be the appropriate event in which to emphasize
howstudents can set in motion the proposed unprecedentedcitizens hearings to:
a. earn academic credit for asemester-long public interest and/or judiciary
auditing and evaluation course;a course on team journalism; or a degree thesis
that applies statistics andfraud and forensic accounting (FFA) to expose the
concealment of assets, taxevasion, and money laundering involved in judges’
bankruptcyfraud scheme; and their misleading mandatory annual financial
disclosurereports(OL:102§a), which they file pro forma with fellow 'revising'
judges, who are subject to the same reporting duty so that their interest lies
in rubberstamping their approval;
b. afford people the opportunity to telltheir story of judicial abuse;
1) This constitutes a significant publicservice given that complaints against
federal judges are dead on arrival: Theyare received, processed, and kept in
secrecy after 100% of them are dismissed and 100% of petitions to review such
dismissals are denied. In fact, not eventhe names of the complained-against
judges are made public. By abusing theself-disciplining power entrusted to
judges by Congress in the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980(28 USC
§§351-364), they ensure for themselves ‘unequalprotection from the law’
compared to malpractisinglawyers and doctors, pedophilic priests, abusive
police officers, election-riggingpoliticians, etc., whose names and the
complaints against them are made publicwhen they are sued(OL3:1305§1).
2) Students’ public service would alsopursue judicial transparency,
accountability, and integrity. As a test casethat can attract public attention,
they can expose the abuse as principal and thecover up of abuse by fellow
judges committed by former Chief Judge of the Courtof Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit and current attorney general MerrickGarland.
c. make the national public the audienceof the citizens hearings by
broadcasting them on the Internet live and making themavailable on demand by
recording them as podcasts;
d. invite investigative journalists,court reporters (those who cover the courts
and judges’ decisions), mediaoutlets, and journalism professors and students to
form part of the panels thathear people’s stories at the citizens hearings just
as lawyers and judges are invited to play the roleof moot court judges; produce
jointly a report on the hearings; and present it at the first-ever conference
on judicialunaccountability and consequent riskless abuse of power, to be held
simultaneously at their schools and media outlets and made accessible to the
national public through interactive multimedia broadcast;
e. publish as a sequel to that citizens hearings report a joint
students/journalistsmultidisciplinary Annual Report on Judicial
Unaccountability and Riskless Abuse of Power, just as law students publish law
reviews and journals, as do so many other student associations in their
respective disciplines. Thereby students and journalists can become in effect
the supervising entity whose creation by Congress judges have strenuously and
consistently opposed: an inspector general for the Federal Judiciary; all this
would set an example to be followed with respect to the state judiciaries;
f. promote the creation of the Institute of Judicial Unaccountability and
Reform Advocacy, attached to a top university or national news network or a
consortium of them, just as The Associated Press “was founded as an independent
news cooperative, whose members are U.S. newspapers and broadcasters”; and
universities hosts a wide variety of centers that specialize in particular
areas of book and laboratory research and field investigation for the
advancement of public and commercial interests and top secret government
projects. Among the Institute’sfunctions are that of a clearinghouse for past
and current complaints againstjudges filed for free by anybody; and a
researchcenter for fee-paying clients to audit judges’ and lawyers’ writings,
transcripts, and news by performing computers-assisted statistical, linguistic,
and literaryanalysis in search of patterns(OL2:792§A), trends(OL2:455§§B,D),
andschemes(OL2:614,929) of abuse of power;
g. participate in launching a generalized journalisticinvestigation of judges’
abuse, just as scandals force media outlets to jump on the investigative
bandwagon on competitive grounds; and h. enhance the resumes that students will
submit to potential employers when applying for summer or permanent jobs with
the description of the public service that the unprecedented citizens hearings
launched by them have rendered and the personal initiative and commitment to
“Equal Justice Under Law” and an informed citizenry that they reveal.
10. I offer to make the presentation ifyou cause the students to organize it. I
can make it via video conference, andif they are willing to pay all my
expenses, in person. To ascertain my capacityto present, watch my video and
follow it on its slides.
B. Approaching university students at the start ofthe new academic year
11. This is the most opportune time toapproach students because the new
academic year will begin soon. During theorientation week for first year
students, which is likely to begin on August30, upper class students will hold
the fair of the many associationsthrough which they pursue their varied
interests. Theupper class students will try to persuade their new school mates
to join theirrespective associations and run to become officers of the class.
Accordingly,they will highlight what their associations have to offer. 12. A
potentially most attractive offeringis participation in trend-setting citizens
hearings concerning what is reasonably expected todominate the national debate
in the coming months:
a. the Biden Commission’s “publicmeetings”, where onlylaw professors are heard
discussing the theory of constitutional lawrelating to the Supreme Court, but
not members of the public willing to tell theirstories of the unaccountability
and abusive conduct in practice of justices andlower court judges;
b. the Commission’s report setting forthits non-binding recommendations for
reforming the Supreme Court, written by commissioners compromised by their
conflict of interests; and
c. what President Biden is expected byeverybody to propose doing together with
his party regardless of the report,thus revealing the Commission as a political
farce: “pack the Court” byincreasing the number of justices from 9 to 15 and
reducing their term inoffice from a life-appointment to a term of years.
1) Packing the Court can affect the balance ofjudicial and political power in
our country for generations. But it will noteven address, let alone reduce,
judicial abuse: The new justices will continuerelying on their unaccountability
to abuse their power risklessly and cover upthe abuse of their fellow justices
and judges.
2) Only the national public, informedthrough the citizens hearings about, and
outraged at, judges’ risklessabuse of power can exert enough pressure as Wethe
People, the sovereign source of all political power in a democracy, to force
transformative changethat recognizes the People’s right as Masters of all
public servants to hold even their judicial public servants accountable for
their exercise of thepublic power entrusted to them, and liable to compensate
the victims of theirabuse.
C. Myoffer to make a presentation to you and your group
13. I offer to make a presentation toyou and your group of guests on how to
implement the above proposals. It cantake place via video conference and, if in
New York City, in person.
14. Toschedule it and agree on its terms, use my contact information hereunder.
D. Every meaningful cause needs resources for itsadvancement;
none can be continued, let alone advanced, without money
15. Lip service advances nothing; butit continues to enable the abusers. 16. To
continue and advance our common causeand form a national movement for judicial
abuse of power exposure,compensation, and reform:
Put your moneywhere your outrage at abuse andpassion for justice are. Donate
to support theprofessional law research and writing, andstrategic thinking of
JudicialDiscipline Reform by making a deposit or an online transfer to Citi
Bank,routing # 021 000 089, account # 6870 82 4342;
through Paypal
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=HBFP5252TB5YJ;
or
by mailing a check to the addressbelow.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely, Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
2165 Bruckner Blvd.
Bronx, NY 10472-6506
tel. (718)827-9521 Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@xxxxxxxxxxx,
DrRCordero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CorderoRic@xxxxxxxxx
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-richard-cordero-esq-0508ba4b Dare trigger ;
history!…and you may enter it.
NOTE: Given the interference with Dr. Cordero’semail and e-cloud storage
accounts described at *>ggl:1et seq. and †>OL2:1114§G, when emailing him, copy
the above bloc ofhis email addresses and paste it in the To: line of your email
so as to enhancethe chances of your email reaching him at least at one of those
addresses.
**********************************************